{"title":"Validation of the self-directed learning scale for middle-aged and older adults","authors":"Fang-Mien Liao, Guan-Liang Chen, Chiu-Tien Hsu, Yu-Hui Liu, Lee-Lan Cheng, Xiong-Chun Chan, Hui-Chuan Wei","doi":"10.1080/03601277.2023.2270874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTConsidering the significance of lifelong learning in advancing active aging in aging societies, the ability to engage in self-directed learning plays a crucial role for adults. There are many self-directed learning (SDL) tools available that measure the SDL abilities of nursing students and healthcare professionals. However, fewer SDL tools specifically designed for middle-aged and older adults have been developed. The purpose of this research was to examine and confirm the factor structure and the internal consistency of the SRSSDL-adult scale, specifically for middle-aged and older adult learners enrolled in senior learning centers. A cross-sectional method was adopted. Both Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were conducted to assess the structural validity of the scale. The internal consistency was determined using the Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient. The results indicated that the five factors – learning needs assessment skills, learning planning skills, learning execution skills, self-assessment skills, and interpersonal skills – showed acceptable levels of reliability. The revised 25-item SRSSDL-adult scale was found to be a valid measure of middle-aged and older adults’ self-directed learning abilities in the context of senior education programs. The findings of this study have the potential to be utilized by educational institutions and educators involved in senior education programs. AcknowledgmentsThe researchers would like to thank Taiwan National Science and Technology Council for the grant MOST 110-2410-H-194-073-.Ethical approvalNational Chung Cheng University. The reference number is CCUREC110051202.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":47793,"journal":{"name":"Educational Gerontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2023.2270874","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTConsidering the significance of lifelong learning in advancing active aging in aging societies, the ability to engage in self-directed learning plays a crucial role for adults. There are many self-directed learning (SDL) tools available that measure the SDL abilities of nursing students and healthcare professionals. However, fewer SDL tools specifically designed for middle-aged and older adults have been developed. The purpose of this research was to examine and confirm the factor structure and the internal consistency of the SRSSDL-adult scale, specifically for middle-aged and older adult learners enrolled in senior learning centers. A cross-sectional method was adopted. Both Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were conducted to assess the structural validity of the scale. The internal consistency was determined using the Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient. The results indicated that the five factors – learning needs assessment skills, learning planning skills, learning execution skills, self-assessment skills, and interpersonal skills – showed acceptable levels of reliability. The revised 25-item SRSSDL-adult scale was found to be a valid measure of middle-aged and older adults’ self-directed learning abilities in the context of senior education programs. The findings of this study have the potential to be utilized by educational institutions and educators involved in senior education programs. AcknowledgmentsThe researchers would like to thank Taiwan National Science and Technology Council for the grant MOST 110-2410-H-194-073-.Ethical approvalNational Chung Cheng University. The reference number is CCUREC110051202.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
期刊介绍:
This well-respected journal offers up-to-date original research in the fields of gerontology, adult education, and the social and behavioral sciences. Researchers from around the world will benefit from the exchange of ideas for both the study and practice of educational gerontology. Papers published in the journal will also serve as authoritative contributions to the growing literature in this burgeoning field. Educational Gerontology is the only international journal of its kind to publish twelve issues per volume year. Articles featuring outcome-based practical educational resources in gerontology for the educational professional, care provider, trainer, and student in such areas as: art, music, drama and recreational therapies; mental health, communication arts, social programs and policies; and, social work, nursing, physical and occupational therapies, financial planners, architecture and interior design, family relations and therapy, and religion and spirituality.