A Systematic Review of Forensic Approaches to Disasters: Gaps and Challenges

IF 2.9 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Disaster Risk Science Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1007/s13753-023-00515-9
Adriano Mota Ferreira, Victor Marchezini, Tatiana Sussel Gonçalves Mendes, Miguel Angel Trejo-Rangel, Allan Yu Iwama
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Forensic Approaches to Disasters: Gaps and Challenges","authors":"Adriano Mota Ferreira, Victor Marchezini, Tatiana Sussel Gonçalves Mendes, Miguel Angel Trejo-Rangel, Allan Yu Iwama","doi":"10.1007/s13753-023-00515-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Disaster forensic approaches aim to identify the causes of disasters to support disaster risk management. However, few studies have conducted a systematic literature review of scientific articles that labeled themselves as a forensic approach to disasters. This article provides a qualitative analysis of these forensic studies, focusing on five main issues: (1) the methodologies applied; (2) the forensic approaches used in the disaster risk management phases; (3) the hazards addressed; (4) if the methodologies involve social participation, and using what types of participation; and (5) if there are references to urban planning in the scientific studies analyzed. Our results showed a predominance of the Forensic Investigations of Disasters (FORIN) and Post-Event Review Capability (PERC) methodologies used in isolation or combination. There is a need for methodologies that engage people in participatory FORIN, fostering the co-production of knowledge and action research approaches.","PeriodicalId":48740,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disaster Risk Science","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disaster Risk Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-023-00515-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Disaster forensic approaches aim to identify the causes of disasters to support disaster risk management. However, few studies have conducted a systematic literature review of scientific articles that labeled themselves as a forensic approach to disasters. This article provides a qualitative analysis of these forensic studies, focusing on five main issues: (1) the methodologies applied; (2) the forensic approaches used in the disaster risk management phases; (3) the hazards addressed; (4) if the methodologies involve social participation, and using what types of participation; and (5) if there are references to urban planning in the scientific studies analyzed. Our results showed a predominance of the Forensic Investigations of Disasters (FORIN) and Post-Event Review Capability (PERC) methodologies used in isolation or combination. There is a need for methodologies that engage people in participatory FORIN, fostering the co-production of knowledge and action research approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灾害法医方法的系统回顾:差距和挑战
灾害法医方法旨在识别灾害原因,为灾害风险管理提供支持。然而,很少有研究对那些标榜自己是灾难法医方法的科学文章进行系统的文献综述。本文对这些法医学研究进行了定性分析,重点关注五个主要问题:(1)应用的方法;(2)灾害风险管理阶段使用的法医学方法;(3)解决的危害;(4)方法是否涉及社会参与,以及使用何种类型的参与;(5)所分析的科学研究是否与城市规划相关。我们的研究结果显示,灾害的法医调查(FORIN)和事后审查能力(PERC)方法在单独或组合使用中占主导地位。有必要采用使人们参与FORIN的方法,促进知识和行动研究方法的共同生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARYMETEOROLOGY-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Disaster Risk Science (IJDRS) provides a pioneering platform for researchers and practitioners aiming at greater resilience and integrated risk governance in view of local, regional, and global disasters. IJDRS breaks new ground in research about disaster risks by connecting in-depth studies of actual disasters and of specific practices of disaster risk management with investigations of the global dynamics of disaster risks and theories and models relevant for advanced integrated risk governance.
期刊最新文献
Identify Landslide Precursors from Time Series InSAR Results Navigating Interoperability in Disaster Management: Insights of Current Trends and Challenges in Saudi Arabia Damage Curves Derived from Hurricane Ike in the West of Galveston Bay Based on Insurance Claims and Hydrodynamic Simulations Identifying Neighborhood Effects on Geohazard Adaptation in Mountainous Rural Areas of China: A Spatial Econometric Model Mapping Seismic Hazard for Canadian Sites Using Spatially Smoothed Seismicity Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1