Arts and culture in transformation: A critical analysis of the national plans for the European Recovery and Resilience Facility

IF 2.7 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE European Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1002/epa2.1188
Diana Betzler, Ellen Loots, Marek Prokůpek
{"title":"Arts and culture in transformation: A critical analysis of the national plans for the European Recovery and Resilience Facility","authors":"Diana Betzler,&nbsp;Ellen Loots,&nbsp;Marek Prokůpek","doi":"10.1002/epa2.1188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The understanding of resilience, and how the ability to respond or adjust to new situations can be implemented and evaluated, gained prominence in public policy. This study examines how European Union (EU) member states plan to support cultural and creative sectors (CCSs) within the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) of the NextGenerationEU Program and how they plan the CCSs to contribute to the grand challenges of our time. Using mixed methods, it is found that the understanding of how structural deficiencies in CCSs can be addressed is not systematic and not all countries invest to make the cultural infrastructure more future-proof. Neither the budgets nor the mode of resilience (absorption, adaptation, and transformation) exposed in the plans consistently correlates with how countries intend to address key impact pillars. Countries with larger CCSs are more prone to transformation. The theoretical contribution lies in the elaboration of the concept of “ex ante resilience.”</p>","PeriodicalId":52190,"journal":{"name":"European Policy Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epa2.1188","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Policy Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epa2.1188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The understanding of resilience, and how the ability to respond or adjust to new situations can be implemented and evaluated, gained prominence in public policy. This study examines how European Union (EU) member states plan to support cultural and creative sectors (CCSs) within the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) of the NextGenerationEU Program and how they plan the CCSs to contribute to the grand challenges of our time. Using mixed methods, it is found that the understanding of how structural deficiencies in CCSs can be addressed is not systematic and not all countries invest to make the cultural infrastructure more future-proof. Neither the budgets nor the mode of resilience (absorption, adaptation, and transformation) exposed in the plans consistently correlates with how countries intend to address key impact pillars. Countries with larger CCSs are more prone to transformation. The theoretical contribution lies in the elaboration of the concept of “ex ante resilience.”

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转型中的艺术与文化:对欧洲复兴和恢复基金国家计划的批判性分析
对复原力的理解,以及如何实施和评估对新情况做出反应或调整的能力,在公共政策中日益突出。本研究探讨了欧盟(EU)成员国如何计划在下一代欧盟计划(NextGenerationEU Program)的恢复和复原力基金(RRF)内支持文化和创意部门(CCSs),以及它们如何计划文化和创意部门为应对当今时代的重大挑战做出贡献。通过采用混合方法,我们发现,对于如何解决中央文化服务中心结构性缺陷的认识并不系统,而且并非所有国家都会投资使文化基础设施更能适应未来的需要。计划中的预算或复原力模式(吸收、适应和转化)与各国打算如何解决主要影响支柱的方式并不一致。中央案例研究规模较大的国家更倾向于转型。理论贡献在于对 "事前复原力 "概念的阐述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Policy Analysis
European Policy Analysis Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Networks and perception in European policymaking Assessing policy capacity and policy effectiveness: A comparative study using sustainable governance indicators Is who they are, what they prefer? Understanding bureaucratic elites' policy preferences for European integration of government accounting Explaining differences in policy learning in the EU "Fit for 55” climate policy package
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1