Annotation Protocol for Textbook Enrichment with Prerequisite Knowledge Graph

IF 3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Technology Knowledge and Learning Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.1007/s10758-023-09682-6
Chiara Alzetta, Ilaria Torre, Frosina Koceva
{"title":"Annotation Protocol for Textbook Enrichment with Prerequisite Knowledge Graph","authors":"Chiara Alzetta, Ilaria Torre, Frosina Koceva","doi":"10.1007/s10758-023-09682-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Extracting and formally representing the knowledge embedded in textbooks, such as the concepts explained and the relations between them, can support the provision of advanced knowledge-based services for learning environments and digital libraries. In this paper, we consider a specific type of relation in textbooks referred to as prerequisite relations (PR). PRs represent precedence relations between concepts aimed to provide the reader with the knowledge needed to understand a further concept(s). Their annotation in educational texts produces datasets that can be represented as a graph of concepts connected by PRs. However, building good-quality and reliable datasets of PRs from a textbook is still an open issue, not just for automated annotation methods but even for manual annotation. In turn, the lack of good-quality datasets and well-defined criteria to identify PRs affect the development and validation of automated methods for prerequisite identification. As a contribution to this issue, in this paper, we propose PREAP, a protocol for the annotation of prerequisite relations in textbooks aimed at obtaining reliable annotated data that can be shared, compared, and reused in the research community. PREAP defines a novel textbook-driven annotation method aimed to capture the structure of prerequisites underlying the text. The protocol has been evaluated against baseline methods for manual and automatic annotation. The findings show that PREAP enables the creation of prerequisite knowledge graphs that have higher inter-annotator agreement, accuracy, and alignment with text than the baseline methods. This suggests that the protocol is able to accurately capture the PRs expressed in the text. Furthermore, the findings show that the time required to complete the annotation using PREAP are significantly shorter than with the other manual baseline methods. The paper includes also guidelines for using PREAP in three annotation scenarios, experimentally tested. We also provide example datasets and a user interface that we developed to support prerequisite annotation.","PeriodicalId":46366,"journal":{"name":"Technology Knowledge and Learning","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology Knowledge and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09682-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Extracting and formally representing the knowledge embedded in textbooks, such as the concepts explained and the relations between them, can support the provision of advanced knowledge-based services for learning environments and digital libraries. In this paper, we consider a specific type of relation in textbooks referred to as prerequisite relations (PR). PRs represent precedence relations between concepts aimed to provide the reader with the knowledge needed to understand a further concept(s). Their annotation in educational texts produces datasets that can be represented as a graph of concepts connected by PRs. However, building good-quality and reliable datasets of PRs from a textbook is still an open issue, not just for automated annotation methods but even for manual annotation. In turn, the lack of good-quality datasets and well-defined criteria to identify PRs affect the development and validation of automated methods for prerequisite identification. As a contribution to this issue, in this paper, we propose PREAP, a protocol for the annotation of prerequisite relations in textbooks aimed at obtaining reliable annotated data that can be shared, compared, and reused in the research community. PREAP defines a novel textbook-driven annotation method aimed to capture the structure of prerequisites underlying the text. The protocol has been evaluated against baseline methods for manual and automatic annotation. The findings show that PREAP enables the creation of prerequisite knowledge graphs that have higher inter-annotator agreement, accuracy, and alignment with text than the baseline methods. This suggests that the protocol is able to accurately capture the PRs expressed in the text. Furthermore, the findings show that the time required to complete the annotation using PREAP are significantly shorter than with the other manual baseline methods. The paper includes also guidelines for using PREAP in three annotation scenarios, experimentally tested. We also provide example datasets and a user interface that we developed to support prerequisite annotation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于前提知识图的教科书充实标注协议
摘要提取并形式化表示教科书中所包含的知识,如所解释的概念和它们之间的关系,可以支持为学习环境和数字图书馆提供先进的知识服务。在本文中,我们考虑教科书中的一种特殊类型的关系,称为前提关系(PR)。pr表示概念之间的优先关系,旨在为读者提供理解进一步概念所需的知识。它们在教育文本中的注释产生的数据集可以表示为由pr连接的概念图。然而,从教科书中构建高质量和可靠的pr数据集仍然是一个开放的问题,不仅对于自动注释方法,甚至对于手动注释也是如此。反过来,缺乏高质量的数据集和定义良好的标准来识别pr会影响先决条件识别自动化方法的开发和验证。为了解决这一问题,本文提出了一种用于教科书中先决关系注释的协议PREAP,该协议旨在获得可靠的注释数据,以便在研究社区中共享、比较和重用。PREAP定义了一种新的教科书驱动的注释方法,旨在捕获文本底层先决条件的结构。该协议已根据手动和自动注释的基线方法进行了评估。研究结果表明,与基线方法相比,PREAP能够创建具有更高的注释者间一致性、准确性和与文本一致性的先决知识图。这表明该协议能够准确地捕获文本中表达的pr。此外,研究结果表明,使用PREAP完成注释所需的时间明显短于使用其他手动基线方法。本文还包括在实验测试的三种注释场景中使用PREAP的指南。我们还提供了示例数据集和我们开发的支持先决条件注释的用户界面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technology Knowledge and Learning
Technology Knowledge and Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Technology, Knowledge and Learning emphasizes the increased interest on context-aware adaptive and personalized digital learning environments. Rapid technological developments have led to new research challenges focusing on digital learning, gamification, automated assessment and learning analytics. These emerging systems aim to provide learning experiences delivered via online environments as well as mobile devices and tailored to the educational needs, the personal characteristics and the particular circumstances of the individual learner or a (massive) group of interconnected learners. Such diverse learning experiences in real-world and virtual situations generates big data which provides rich potential for in-depth intelligent analysis and adaptive feedback as well as scaffolds whenever the learner needs it. Novel manuscripts are welcome that account for how these new technologies and systems reconfigure learning experiences, assessment methodologies as well as future educational practices. Technology, Knowledge and Learning also publishes guest-edited themed special issues linked to the emerging field of educational technology.    Submissions can be empirical investigations, work in progress studies or emerging technology reports. Empirical investigations report quantitative or qualitative research demonstrating advances in digital learning, gamification, automated assessment or learning analytics. Work-in-progress studies provide early insights into leading projects or document progressions of excellent research within the field of digital learning, gamification, automated assessment or learning analytics. Emerging technology reports review new developments in educational technology by assessing the potentials for leading digital learning environments.   Manuscripts submitted to Technology, Knowledge and Learning undergo a blind review process involving expert reviews and in-depth evaluations. Initial feedback is usually provided within eight weeks including in progress open-access abstracts and review snapshots.
期刊最新文献
Fairness of Academic Performance Prediction for the Distribution of Support Measures for Students: Differences in Perceived Fairness of Distributive Justice Norms A Road Less Traveled for Designing Rigorous Studies to Identify Effective Technology-Based Reading Interventions Predictive Video Analytics in Online Courses: A Systematic Literature Review Teachers’ Beliefs and Usage of Video Exemplars and Engagement Features of an Online Professional Learning System for Promoting Early Writing How Personality Traits Affect Peer Assessment in Distance Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1