Rebecca McLoughlin, Jenna Love, Jared G Smith, Whitney Scott, Tim Noblet
{"title":"Evaluating the feasibility of delivering a pain management programme for adults living with sickle cell disease","authors":"Rebecca McLoughlin, Jenna Love, Jared G Smith, Whitney Scott, Tim Noblet","doi":"10.1177/20494637231202744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Pain is the prominent feature of sickle cell disease (SCD) and negatively affects quality of life. Delivery of pain management programmes (PMPs) has been suggested in clinical guidelines for pain management in SCD; however, further evidence of the feasibility and effectiveness of PMPs in this population is needed. This study explored the feasibility of delivering a sickle cell pain management programme (SCPMP) for adults within a haemoglobinopathies service. Methods A single arm, repeated-measures observational design was used to determine feasibility of delivering the SCPMP at one study site. Primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment, completion of treatment and outcome measures, satisfaction, credibility and acceptability to participants. Secondary feasibility outcomes were treatment outcomes and processes, frequency of vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) and healthcare utilisation. Results Four of five feasibility criteria were met. Annual recruitment of eight participants to a SCPMP was not achieved. Twenty-nine people began a SCPMP during the study period. Twenty-five (86.2%) participants attended ≥5/8 sessions and 21(84%) programme completers provided all end of programme questionnaires. Mean scores of >7 on ten-point scales were seen across satisfaction and credibility questions. At least moderate (Hedges g >0.5) effect sizes were seen in pre-post SCPMP measures of pain interference, anxiety, depression, self-efficacy, pain-related worry and acceptance. A small (Hedges g 0.4) effect size was seen in HRQoL. Following SCPMP attendance, mean frequency of self-reported VOC and hospital admissions reduced. Conclusions This study suggests that, given an adequate source of referrals, a SCPMP is feasible to deliver and appears acceptable and credible to participants. Exploration of influences on recruitment, such as barriers to group interventions, would be illuminating, prior to investigating feasibility of an adequately powered randomised-controlled trial.","PeriodicalId":46585,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20494637231202744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Pain is the prominent feature of sickle cell disease (SCD) and negatively affects quality of life. Delivery of pain management programmes (PMPs) has been suggested in clinical guidelines for pain management in SCD; however, further evidence of the feasibility and effectiveness of PMPs in this population is needed. This study explored the feasibility of delivering a sickle cell pain management programme (SCPMP) for adults within a haemoglobinopathies service. Methods A single arm, repeated-measures observational design was used to determine feasibility of delivering the SCPMP at one study site. Primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment, completion of treatment and outcome measures, satisfaction, credibility and acceptability to participants. Secondary feasibility outcomes were treatment outcomes and processes, frequency of vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) and healthcare utilisation. Results Four of five feasibility criteria were met. Annual recruitment of eight participants to a SCPMP was not achieved. Twenty-nine people began a SCPMP during the study period. Twenty-five (86.2%) participants attended ≥5/8 sessions and 21(84%) programme completers provided all end of programme questionnaires. Mean scores of >7 on ten-point scales were seen across satisfaction and credibility questions. At least moderate (Hedges g >0.5) effect sizes were seen in pre-post SCPMP measures of pain interference, anxiety, depression, self-efficacy, pain-related worry and acceptance. A small (Hedges g 0.4) effect size was seen in HRQoL. Following SCPMP attendance, mean frequency of self-reported VOC and hospital admissions reduced. Conclusions This study suggests that, given an adequate source of referrals, a SCPMP is feasible to deliver and appears acceptable and credible to participants. Exploration of influences on recruitment, such as barriers to group interventions, would be illuminating, prior to investigating feasibility of an adequately powered randomised-controlled trial.
疼痛是镰状细胞病(SCD)的显著特征,并对生活质量产生负面影响。疼痛管理方案(pmp)的交付已被建议在SCD疼痛管理的临床指南;然而,需要进一步证明PMPs在这一人群中的可行性和有效性。本研究探讨了在血红蛋白病服务中为成人提供镰状细胞疼痛管理方案(SCPMP)的可行性。方法采用单臂、重复测量观察设计来确定在一个研究地点递送SCPMP的可行性。主要可行性结果包括招募、治疗完成和结果测量、满意度、可信度和参与者的可接受性。次要可行性结果是治疗结果和过程、血管闭塞危象(VOC)的频率和医疗保健利用。结果符合5项可行性标准中的4项。没有实现每年为方案管理方案征聘8名参与者。在研究期间,29人开始了SCPMP。25名(86.2%)参与者参加了≥5/8次会议,21名(84%)项目完成者提供了所有项目结束时的问卷。满意度和可信度问题的平均得分为7分(满分为10分)。在SCPMP前后对疼痛干扰、焦虑、抑郁、自我效能、疼痛相关担忧和接受的测量中,至少可以看到中等(Hedges g >0.5)的效应量。HRQoL的效应值较小(Hedges g 0.4)。参加SCPMP后,自我报告VOC的平均频率和住院次数减少。结论:本研究表明,如果有足够的转诊来源,SCPMP是可行的,并且对参与者来说是可接受和可信的。在调查充分有力的随机对照试验的可行性之前,探索对招募的影响,如群体干预的障碍,将具有启发性。
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Pain is a peer-reviewed quarterly British journal with an international multidisciplinary Editorial Board. The journal publishes original research and reviews on all major aspects of pain and pain management. Reviews reflect the body of evidence of the topic and are suitable for a multidisciplinary readership. Where empirical evidence is lacking, the reviews reflect the generally held opinions of experts in the field. The Journal has broadened its scope and has become a forum for publishing primary research together with brief reports related to pain and pain interventions. Submissions from all over the world have been published and are welcome. Official journal of the British Pain Society.