KIBRIS MESELESİ BAĞLAMINDA BİR DİPLOMASİ ARACI OLARAK İYİ NİYET HEYETLERİ (1964-1965)

Ersin MÜEZZİNOĞLU
{"title":"KIBRIS MESELESİ BAĞLAMINDA BİR DİPLOMASİ ARACI OLARAK İYİ NİYET HEYETLERİ (1964-1965)","authors":"Ersin MÜEZZİNOĞLU","doi":"10.55773/tda.1209308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the end of 1964, Turkey decided to send seven Goodwill Missions to Asia, Africa, South and Central America and Arab countries in order to explain its views, attitudes and demands on the Cyprus issue and to promote Turkey in all its aspects. It was expected from the work of these delegations, which consisted of deputies, professors, ambassadors and journalists, who went to more than seventy countries, as a result of the support of Turkey's theses, especially in the votes to be held in the United Nations General Assembly on the Cyprus issue. However, in the Political Commission of the United Nations General Assembly held on December 17, 1965, a bill that envisaged the determination of the future of Cyprus in accordance with Makarios' theses was accepted as a result of the voting. In the voting, where 47 countries voted in favor of the bill and 51 countries abstained, only 6 countries, including Turkey, voted against it. This result has been a political earthquake for Turkish foreign policy. The expected support for Turkey's Cyprus thesis did not come from the African, Latin American and Arab countries visited by the Goodwill Delegations. On the contrary, although the desired result could not be obtained in the UN vote, it has been put forward that the visits of Goodwill Delegations are beneficial in terms of getting to know the relevant countries better, seeing how Turkey is viewed, and learning what should be done in terms of developing bilateral relations. The work of the Goodwill Committees has also found extensive coverage in the Turkish press. Journalist Nilüfer Yalçın, who was also included in the Goodwill Mission sent to the Middle East, shared her contacts in detail with her articles published in a series in the Milliyet newspaper. In this article, the Goodwill Delegations initiative will be discussed mainly through Yalçın's series of articles, and why this initiative was undertaken, how it was carried out, and what effects it had on Turkish foreign policy will be discussed.","PeriodicalId":498137,"journal":{"name":"Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55773/tda.1209308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the end of 1964, Turkey decided to send seven Goodwill Missions to Asia, Africa, South and Central America and Arab countries in order to explain its views, attitudes and demands on the Cyprus issue and to promote Turkey in all its aspects. It was expected from the work of these delegations, which consisted of deputies, professors, ambassadors and journalists, who went to more than seventy countries, as a result of the support of Turkey's theses, especially in the votes to be held in the United Nations General Assembly on the Cyprus issue. However, in the Political Commission of the United Nations General Assembly held on December 17, 1965, a bill that envisaged the determination of the future of Cyprus in accordance with Makarios' theses was accepted as a result of the voting. In the voting, where 47 countries voted in favor of the bill and 51 countries abstained, only 6 countries, including Turkey, voted against it. This result has been a political earthquake for Turkish foreign policy. The expected support for Turkey's Cyprus thesis did not come from the African, Latin American and Arab countries visited by the Goodwill Delegations. On the contrary, although the desired result could not be obtained in the UN vote, it has been put forward that the visits of Goodwill Delegations are beneficial in terms of getting to know the relevant countries better, seeing how Turkey is viewed, and learning what should be done in terms of developing bilateral relations. The work of the Goodwill Committees has also found extensive coverage in the Turkish press. Journalist Nilüfer Yalçın, who was also included in the Goodwill Mission sent to the Middle East, shared her contacts in detail with her articles published in a series in the Milliyet newspaper. In this article, the Goodwill Delegations initiative will be discussed mainly through Yalçın's series of articles, and why this initiative was undertaken, how it was carried out, and what effects it had on Turkish foreign policy will be discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲善代表团作为解决塞浦路斯问题的外交工具(1964--1965 年)
1964年年底,土耳其决定派遣七个亲善特派团前往亚洲、非洲、南美洲和中美洲以及阿拉伯国家,以解释它对塞浦路斯问题的看法、态度和要求,并在土耳其的所有方面进行宣传。这些代表团由代表、教授、大使和记者组成,由于支持土耳其的提纲,特别是在联合国大会将就塞浦路斯问题举行的投票,他们前往了70多个国家。然而,在1965年12月17日举行的联合国大会政治委员会上,一项设想根据马卡里奥斯的提纲决定塞浦路斯未来的法案在表决后获得通过。在投票中,47个国家投了赞成票,51个国家弃权,只有包括土耳其在内的6个国家投了反对票。这一结果对土耳其外交政策来说是一场政治地震。亲善代表团访问的非洲、拉丁美洲和阿拉伯国家并没有得到预期的对土耳其塞浦路斯论点的支持。相反,虽然在联合国投票中未能取得预期的结果,但有人提出,亲善代表团的访问有利于更好地了解有关国家,了解土耳其是如何看待的,以及在发展双边关系方面应该做些什么。亲善委员会的工作也得到土耳其新闻界的广泛报道。记者nil fer Yalçın也参加了派往中东的亲善团,她在《Milliyet》报纸上发表了一系列文章,详细分享了她的联系方式。在本文中,亲善代表团倡议将主要通过Yalçın的一系列文章进行讨论,并将讨论为什么要采取这一倡议,它是如何执行的,以及它对土耳其外交政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LEV NİKOLAYEVİÇ GUMİLEV VE COĞRAFİ DETERMİNİZM TÜRKİYE'DE SİYASAL PROPAGANDA ARAÇLARININ KULLANIMINA BİR ÖRNEK: "27 MAYIS 1960 İNKILABI" A RESEARCH ON EARTHQUAKE SURVIVORS AND THOSE WHO HOUSE EARTHQUAKE SURVIVORS IN THEIR HOMES: THE ESENKÖY CASE KIBRIS MESELESİ BAĞLAMINDA BİR DİPLOMASİ ARACI OLARAK İYİ NİYET HEYETLERİ (1964-1965) TÜRKİYE’DE PETROL FİYATLARININ İHRACAT ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNİN ARAŞTIRILMASI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1