{"title":"NOTES FROM THE EDITOR","authors":"Steve Ruddock","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.editorial","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gaming Law ReviewVol. 27, No. 6 Notes From the EditorFree AccessNOTES FROM THE EDITORSteve RuddockSteve RuddockSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:3 Aug 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.EditorialAboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail One could pull at any number of threads in the gambling industry. When unraveled, a lot of these threads will be interconnected. Whether it's the sudden emphasis on responsible gambling policies and procedures, the expansion of regulated online gambling around the globe (although much of the focus has been on the U.S.), or the rethinking of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) and how tribal gaming fits into the landscape.One of the most significant developments on the tribal gaming front is playing out in the U.S. legal system, as the Seminole Tribe and the state of Florida scored a decisive victory at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which found their 2022 compact legitimate.The case will be discussed at length in the September issue, and in this issue, we have the first part of an exclusive roundtable on the proposed changes by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) with some of the top minds in the areas of tribal gaming law. The wide-ranging discussion touched on many different areas, which explains why the entire conversation will take up space in two issues.Beyond the BIA rules and the West Flagler case, there are also tribal developments in California, where the ongoing dispute between the state's gaming tribes and commercial cardrooms over so-called player-banked games is being discussed in the legislature. The new bill would grant tribes a one-time exception to file suit against cardrooms they believe are violating tribal gaming exclusivity. Previous legal efforts by California tribes have been dismissed for lack of standing due to tribal sovereignty. This is a topic Gaming Law Review would like to cover in-depth. If you are interested in tackling this complex topic, please reach out to [email protected].FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 27Issue 6Aug 2023 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Steve Ruddock.NOTES FROM THE EDITOR.Gaming Law Review.Aug 2023.271-271.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.EditorialPublished in Volume: 27 Issue 6: August 3, 2023PDF download","PeriodicalId":44210,"journal":{"name":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.editorial","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Gaming Law ReviewVol. 27, No. 6 Notes From the EditorFree AccessNOTES FROM THE EDITORSteve RuddockSteve RuddockSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:3 Aug 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.EditorialAboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail One could pull at any number of threads in the gambling industry. When unraveled, a lot of these threads will be interconnected. Whether it's the sudden emphasis on responsible gambling policies and procedures, the expansion of regulated online gambling around the globe (although much of the focus has been on the U.S.), or the rethinking of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) and how tribal gaming fits into the landscape.One of the most significant developments on the tribal gaming front is playing out in the U.S. legal system, as the Seminole Tribe and the state of Florida scored a decisive victory at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which found their 2022 compact legitimate.The case will be discussed at length in the September issue, and in this issue, we have the first part of an exclusive roundtable on the proposed changes by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) with some of the top minds in the areas of tribal gaming law. The wide-ranging discussion touched on many different areas, which explains why the entire conversation will take up space in two issues.Beyond the BIA rules and the West Flagler case, there are also tribal developments in California, where the ongoing dispute between the state's gaming tribes and commercial cardrooms over so-called player-banked games is being discussed in the legislature. The new bill would grant tribes a one-time exception to file suit against cardrooms they believe are violating tribal gaming exclusivity. Previous legal efforts by California tribes have been dismissed for lack of standing due to tribal sovereignty. This is a topic Gaming Law Review would like to cover in-depth. If you are interested in tackling this complex topic, please reach out to [email protected].FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 27Issue 6Aug 2023 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Steve Ruddock.NOTES FROM THE EDITOR.Gaming Law Review.Aug 2023.271-271.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.EditorialPublished in Volume: 27 Issue 6: August 3, 2023PDF download