The article explores the evolution of Macau's gambling laws and regulations from 1961 to the present day. The independent gambling laws and regulations of Macau began in the 1960s, initially with casino gaming, and then expanded to other types of gambling such as horse racing betting, greyhound racing betting, soccer betting, and lotteries over the next three decades. During this period, the Portuguese colonial government ruled Macau. After Macau's handover to China in 1999, the gambling laws and regulations have continuously grown into a legal system that comprises more than a hundred documents and covers all types of gaming in Macau. The article aims to explore the historical origin and development of the primary rules, especially their unique features, to provide a better understanding of Macau's gaming legal system.
{"title":"OVERVIEW OF MACAU'S LEGISLATION ON GAMBLING: 1961–2023","authors":"CHANGBIN WANG, JINGZHEN XIE","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2023.0014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.0014","url":null,"abstract":"The article explores the evolution of Macau's gambling laws and regulations from 1961 to the present day. The independent gambling laws and regulations of Macau began in the 1960s, initially with casino gaming, and then expanded to other types of gambling such as horse racing betting, greyhound racing betting, soccer betting, and lotteries over the next three decades. During this period, the Portuguese colonial government ruled Macau. After Macau's handover to China in 1999, the gambling laws and regulations have continuously grown into a legal system that comprises more than a hundred documents and covers all types of gaming in Macau. The article aims to explore the historical origin and development of the primary rules, especially their unique features, to provide a better understanding of Macau's gaming legal system.","PeriodicalId":44210,"journal":{"name":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135933718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Gaming Law ReviewAhead of Print GAMBLING, CRYPTOCURRENCY, AND FINANCIAL TRADING SPONSORSHIP IN HIGH-LEVEL MEN'S SOCCER LEAGUES: AN UPDATE FOR THE 2023/2024 SEASONJAMIE TORRANCE, CONOR HEATH, and PHILIP NEWALLJAMIE TORRANCEAddress correspondence to: Jamie Torrance, PhD, E-mail Address: [email protected]Jamie Torrance, PhD, is a Lecturer at the School of Psychology, University of Chester in Chester, UK and at the School of Psychology, Swansea University in Swansea, UK.Search for more papers by this author, CONOR HEATHAddress correspondence to: Conor Heath, PhD, E-mail Address: [email protected]Conor Heath is a Master of Science – User Experience Design Student at the School of Business, Law and Social Sciences, Birmingham City University in Birmingham, UK.Search for more papers by this author, and PHILIP NEWALLAddress correspondence to: Philip Newall, PhD, E-mail Address: [email protected]Philip Newall, PhD, is a Lecturer at the School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol in Bristol, UK.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:2 Nov 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.0028AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View articleFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 0Issue 0 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:JAMIE TORRANCE, CONOR HEATH, and PHILIP NEWALL.GAMBLING, CRYPTOCURRENCY, AND FINANCIAL TRADING SPONSORSHIP IN HIGH-LEVEL MEN'S SOCCER LEAGUES: AN UPDATE FOR THE 2023/2024 SEASON.Gaming Law Review.ahead of printhttp://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.0028Online Ahead of Print:November 2, 2023Keywordsgamblingcryptocurrencyfinancial tradingsponsorshipsoccerPDF download
{"title":"GAMBLING, CRYPTOCURRENCY, AND FINANCIAL TRADING SPONSORSHIP IN HIGH-LEVEL MEN'S SOCCER LEAGUES: AN UPDATE FOR THE 2023/2024 SEASON","authors":"JAMIE TORRANCE, CONOR HEATH, PHILIP NEWALL","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2023.0028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.0028","url":null,"abstract":"Gaming Law ReviewAhead of Print GAMBLING, CRYPTOCURRENCY, AND FINANCIAL TRADING SPONSORSHIP IN HIGH-LEVEL MEN'S SOCCER LEAGUES: AN UPDATE FOR THE 2023/2024 SEASONJAMIE TORRANCE, CONOR HEATH, and PHILIP NEWALLJAMIE TORRANCEAddress correspondence to: Jamie Torrance, PhD, E-mail Address: [email protected]Jamie Torrance, PhD, is a Lecturer at the School of Psychology, University of Chester in Chester, UK and at the School of Psychology, Swansea University in Swansea, UK.Search for more papers by this author, CONOR HEATHAddress correspondence to: Conor Heath, PhD, E-mail Address: [email protected]Conor Heath is a Master of Science – User Experience Design Student at the School of Business, Law and Social Sciences, Birmingham City University in Birmingham, UK.Search for more papers by this author, and PHILIP NEWALLAddress correspondence to: Philip Newall, PhD, E-mail Address: [email protected]Philip Newall, PhD, is a Lecturer at the School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol in Bristol, UK.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:2 Nov 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.0028AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View articleFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 0Issue 0 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:JAMIE TORRANCE, CONOR HEATH, and PHILIP NEWALL.GAMBLING, CRYPTOCURRENCY, AND FINANCIAL TRADING SPONSORSHIP IN HIGH-LEVEL MEN'S SOCCER LEAGUES: AN UPDATE FOR THE 2023/2024 SEASON.Gaming Law Review.ahead of printhttp://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.0028Online Ahead of Print:November 2, 2023Keywordsgamblingcryptocurrencyfinancial tradingsponsorshipsoccerPDF download","PeriodicalId":44210,"journal":{"name":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","volume":"152 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135933567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1089/glr2.2023.29092.rro
RYAN M. RODENBERG
Gaming Law ReviewAhead of Print U.S. FEDERAL AGENCY REJECTS POLITICAL PREDICTION MARKETRYAN M. RODENBERGRYAN M. RODENBERGRyan M. Rodenberg, JD/PhD, is a Professor at Florida State University in Tallahassee, Florida, USA.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:25 Oct 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29092.rroAboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View article"U.S. FEDERAL AGENCY REJECTS POLITICAL PREDICTION MARKET." Gaming Law Review, , pp. FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 0Issue 0 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:RYAN M. RODENBERG.U.S. FEDERAL AGENCY REJECTS POLITICAL PREDICTION MARKET.Gaming Law Review.ahead of printhttp://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29092.rroOnline Ahead of Print:October 25, 2023Keywordsprediction marketspoliticsregulationPDF download
美国联邦机构拒绝政治预测市场美国联邦机构拒绝政治预测市场美国联邦机构拒绝政治预测市场法学博士，美国佛罗里达州塔拉哈西佛罗里达州立大学教授。搜索本文作者的更多论文发表在线:2023年10月25日https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29092.rroAboutSectionsView文章查看全文pdf /EPUB权限和引文下载CitationsTrack引文添加到收藏夹返回出版物ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail查看文章“美国联邦机构拒绝政治预测市场。”《博彩法律评论》，第0卷第0期信息版权所有，Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.，出版社。联邦机构拒绝政治预测市场。博彩法律评论。预印://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29092.rroOnline预印:2023年10月25日关键词预测市场政治法规pdf下载
{"title":"U.S. FEDERAL AGENCY REJECTS POLITICAL PREDICTION MARKET","authors":"RYAN M. RODENBERG","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2023.29092.rro","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29092.rro","url":null,"abstract":"Gaming Law ReviewAhead of Print U.S. FEDERAL AGENCY REJECTS POLITICAL PREDICTION MARKETRYAN M. RODENBERGRYAN M. RODENBERGRyan M. Rodenberg, JD/PhD, is a Professor at Florida State University in Tallahassee, Florida, USA.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:25 Oct 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29092.rroAboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View article\"U.S. FEDERAL AGENCY REJECTS POLITICAL PREDICTION MARKET.\" Gaming Law Review, , pp. FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 0Issue 0 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:RYAN M. RODENBERG.U.S. FEDERAL AGENCY REJECTS POLITICAL PREDICTION MARKET.Gaming Law Review.ahead of printhttp://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29092.rroOnline Ahead of Print:October 25, 2023Keywordsprediction marketspoliticsregulationPDF download","PeriodicalId":44210,"journal":{"name":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","volume":"266 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135111472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Highlighted by recent changes enacted by both Tennessee and Ohio, states are continuing to figure out how to best maximize the bang for their buck when it comes to collecting tax revenue from sports wagering operators.
{"title":"STATES STILL SEEKING SWEET SPOT FOR SPORTS BETTING TAX DOLLARS","authors":"Chris Altruda","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2023.0030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.0030","url":null,"abstract":"Highlighted by recent changes enacted by both Tennessee and Ohio, states are continuing to figure out how to best maximize the bang for their buck when it comes to collecting tax revenue from sports wagering operators.","PeriodicalId":44210,"journal":{"name":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","volume":"160 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135161625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1089/glr2.2023.29094.editorial
Steve Ruddock
Gaming Law ReviewVol. 27, No. 9 Notes From the EditorFree AccessNOTES FROM THE EDITORSteve RuddockSteve RuddockSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:8 Nov 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29094.editorialAboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail As we prepare for 2024, there are several significant cases weaving their way through the legal system and regulatory developments that could radically alter gambling in the U.S.At the top of the list is the battle over legal sports betting in Florida. A compact between the Seminole Tribe and Florida would have given the tribe control of retail and online sports betting in the state. The compact was challenged by West Flagler Associates. The case has made its way to the Supreme Court of the U.S. (at the time of writing, SCOTUS has not decided if it will hear the case). At the same time, West Flagler has also filed a case with the Florida Supreme Court.Another hot-button issue is the legality of DFS+ or DFS 2.0. Several states have begun cracking down on these games, which pit the player vs. the house, rather than the traditional peer-to-peer fantasy sports model. This fight has pitted the new DFS operators like Sleeper, Underdog Fantasy, and PrizePicks against the original DFS operators who have now moved into the sports betting arena, DraftKings and FanDuel.And in the background are the various legal battles over skill games, most notably in North Carolina, Missouri, and Virginia. Fliff's fight with California, which claims the company's sweepstakes offerings constitute illegal sports betting. And a class action suit claiming Roblox is targeting minors with illegal gambling.2024 will certainly be interesting.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 27Issue 9Nov 2023 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Steve Ruddock.NOTES FROM THE EDITOR.Gaming Law Review.Nov 2023.429-429.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29094.editorialPublished in Volume: 27 Issue 9: November 8, 2023PDF download
博彩法律评论卷。27、第9号编者备注免费访问编者备注史蒂夫·鲁多克史蒂夫·鲁多克搜索本文作者的更多论文发表在线:2023年11月8日https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29094.editorialAboutSectionsPDF/EPUB权限& CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack citations添加到收藏回到出版分享分享在facebook上推特链接InRedditEmail在美国的法律体系和监管发展过程中，有几起重大案件可能会从根本上改变美国的博彩业，其中最重要的是佛罗里达州的合法体育博彩之争。塞米诺尔部落(Seminole Tribe)和佛罗里达州之间的一项协议将使该部落控制该州的零售和在线体育博彩。该契约遭到了西弗拉格勒协会的挑战。该案已被提交至美国最高法院(在撰写本文时，最高法院尚未决定是否审理此案)。与此同时，西弗拉格勒也向佛罗里达州最高法院提起了诉讼。另一个热点问题是DFS+或DFS 2.0的合法性。一些州已经开始打击这些游戏，这些游戏让玩家对抗赌场，而不是传统的点对点梦幻体育模式。这场战斗是新的DFS运营商，如Sleeper, Underdog Fantasy和PrizePicks与现在已经进入体育博彩领域的原始DFS运营商DraftKings和FanDuel之间的战斗。背景是各种关于技能游戏的法律纠纷，尤其是在北卡罗来纳州、密苏里州和弗吉尼亚州。lifff与加州的斗争，后者声称该公司的抽奖产品构成非法体育博彩。还有一起集体诉讼指控Roblox针对未成年人进行非法赌博。2024年肯定会很有趣。信息版权所有2023,Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.，出版商本文引用:Steve Ruddock。编辑注释。博彩法律评论。Nov 2023.429-429.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29094.editorialPublished in Volume: 27 Issue 9:十一月8,2023PDF下载
{"title":"NOTES FROM THE EDITOR","authors":"Steve Ruddock","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2023.29094.editorial","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29094.editorial","url":null,"abstract":"Gaming Law ReviewVol. 27, No. 9 Notes From the EditorFree AccessNOTES FROM THE EDITORSteve RuddockSteve RuddockSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:8 Nov 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29094.editorialAboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail As we prepare for 2024, there are several significant cases weaving their way through the legal system and regulatory developments that could radically alter gambling in the U.S.At the top of the list is the battle over legal sports betting in Florida. A compact between the Seminole Tribe and Florida would have given the tribe control of retail and online sports betting in the state. The compact was challenged by West Flagler Associates. The case has made its way to the Supreme Court of the U.S. (at the time of writing, SCOTUS has not decided if it will hear the case). At the same time, West Flagler has also filed a case with the Florida Supreme Court.Another hot-button issue is the legality of DFS+ or DFS 2.0. Several states have begun cracking down on these games, which pit the player vs. the house, rather than the traditional peer-to-peer fantasy sports model. This fight has pitted the new DFS operators like Sleeper, Underdog Fantasy, and PrizePicks against the original DFS operators who have now moved into the sports betting arena, DraftKings and FanDuel.And in the background are the various legal battles over skill games, most notably in North Carolina, Missouri, and Virginia. Fliff's fight with California, which claims the company's sweepstakes offerings constitute illegal sports betting. And a class action suit claiming Roblox is targeting minors with illegal gambling.2024 will certainly be interesting.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 27Issue 9Nov 2023 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Steve Ruddock.NOTES FROM THE EDITOR.Gaming Law Review.Nov 2023.429-429.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29094.editorialPublished in Volume: 27 Issue 9: November 8, 2023PDF download","PeriodicalId":44210,"journal":{"name":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","volume":"117 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135610066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1089/glr2.2023.29091.cas
Gaming Law ReviewAhead of Print UNITED STATES OF AMERICAbefore theCOMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSIONIn the Matter of the Certification by KalshiEX LLC of Derivatives Contracts with Respectto Political Control of the United States Senate and United States House of RepresentativesORDERPublished Online:16 Oct 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29091.casAboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View articleFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 0Issue 0 InformationCopyright 2023, 2023 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:UNITED STATES OF AMERICAbefore theCOMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSIONIn the Matter of the Certification by KalshiEX LLC of Derivatives Contracts with Respectto Political Control of the United States Senate and United States House of RepresentativesORDER.Gaming Law Review.ahead of printhttp://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29091.casOnline Ahead of Print:October 16, 2023PDF download
博彩法律评论印刷前美国商品期货交易委员会在KalshiEX有限责任公司关于美国参议院和美国众议院政治控制的衍生品合同认证事项中发布在线:2023年10月16日https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29091.casAboutSectionsView文章查看全文pdf /EPUB权限和引文下载引文列表添加到收藏夹返回发布共享共享在facebook上推特上链接在redditemail查看文章数据参考资料相关信息第0卷第0期信息版权所有2023,2023 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.，出版商引用这篇文章:美利坚合众国在商品期货交易委员会之前，关于KalshiEX LLC关于美国参议院和美国众议院政治控制的衍生品合约的认证事宜。博彩法律评论。打印前://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29091.casOnline打印前:2023年10月16日pdf下载
{"title":"UNITED STATES OF AMERICAbefore theCOMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSIONIn the Matter of the Certification by KalshiEX LLC of Derivatives Contracts with Respectto Political Control of the United States Senate and United States House of RepresentativesORDER","authors":"","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2023.29091.cas","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29091.cas","url":null,"abstract":"Gaming Law ReviewAhead of Print UNITED STATES OF AMERICAbefore theCOMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSIONIn the Matter of the Certification by KalshiEX LLC of Derivatives Contracts with Respectto Political Control of the United States Senate and United States House of RepresentativesORDERPublished Online:16 Oct 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29091.casAboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View articleFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 0Issue 0 InformationCopyright 2023, 2023 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:UNITED STATES OF AMERICAbefore theCOMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSIONIn the Matter of the Certification by KalshiEX LLC of Derivatives Contracts with Respectto Political Control of the United States Senate and United States House of RepresentativesORDER.Gaming Law Review.ahead of printhttp://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29091.casOnline Ahead of Print:October 16, 2023PDF download","PeriodicalId":44210,"journal":{"name":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","volume":"11 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135112160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01DOI: 10.1089/glr2.2023.29093.int
Jamie Salsburg, Christopher Adams
Gaming Law ReviewVol. 27, No. 9 CommentariesAN INTERVIEW WITH CHRISTOPHER ADAMSInterviewer: Jamie Salsburg and Interviewee: Christopher AdamsInterviewer: Jamie SalsburgJamie Salsburg is a Brand Strategist and the Founder of Dyve Agency.Search for more papers by this author and Interviewee: Christopher AdamsChristopher Adams is the Founder and CEO of SharpRank, the sports betting industry's first independent ratings agency.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:8 Nov 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29093.intAboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View articleFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 27Issue 9Nov 2023 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Interviewer: Jamie Salsburg and Interviewee: Christopher Adams.AN INTERVIEW WITH CHRISTOPHER ADAMS.Gaming Law Review.Nov 2023.460-478.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29093.intPublished in Volume: 27 Issue 9: November 8, 2023Keywordssports advertisingresponsible gamblingonline gamblingsports bettingU.S. gamblingPDF download
博彩法律评论卷。评论专访克里斯托弗·亚当斯访谈者:杰米·萨尔斯伯格访谈者:杰米·萨尔斯伯格杰米·萨尔斯伯格是一位品牌战略家，也是Dyve公司的创始人。本文作者:Christopher Adams是体育博彩行业首家独立评级机构SharpRank的创始人兼首席执行官。搜索本文作者的更多论文发表在线:2023年11月8日https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29093.intAboutSectionsView文章查看全文pdf /EPUB权限& CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack citations添加到收藏回到出版物共享分享在facebook上推特链接在redditemail查看文章figuresreferencesrelateddetails第27期9Nov 2023信息版权2023,Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.，出版商引用本文:采访人:杰米萨尔斯堡和受访者:克里斯托弗亚当斯。克里斯托弗·亚当斯的采访。博彩法律评论。2023年11月460-478.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29093.intPublished第27卷第9期2023年11月8日关键词体育广告负责任赌博网络赌博体育博彩美国gamblingPDF下载
{"title":"AN INTERVIEW WITH CHRISTOPHER ADAMS","authors":"Jamie Salsburg, Christopher Adams","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2023.29093.int","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29093.int","url":null,"abstract":"Gaming Law ReviewVol. 27, No. 9 CommentariesAN INTERVIEW WITH CHRISTOPHER ADAMSInterviewer: Jamie Salsburg and Interviewee: Christopher AdamsInterviewer: Jamie SalsburgJamie Salsburg is a Brand Strategist and the Founder of Dyve Agency.Search for more papers by this author and Interviewee: Christopher AdamsChristopher Adams is the Founder and CEO of SharpRank, the sports betting industry's first independent ratings agency.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:8 Nov 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29093.intAboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View articleFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 27Issue 9Nov 2023 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Interviewer: Jamie Salsburg and Interviewee: Christopher Adams.AN INTERVIEW WITH CHRISTOPHER ADAMS.Gaming Law Review.Nov 2023.460-478.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29093.intPublished in Volume: 27 Issue 9: November 8, 2023Keywordssports advertisingresponsible gamblingonline gamblingsports bettingU.S. gamblingPDF download","PeriodicalId":44210,"journal":{"name":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","volume":"47 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135566031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article discusses the lack of strict enforcement of online gambling regulations in the Chinese esports industry despite the establishment of relevant regulations. The lack of criminal or administrative penalties for online gambling related to esports is demonstrated through three examples in this article: Chinese esports teams accepting sponsorships from online gambling companies, the lack of punishment for Chinese esports players involved in match-fixing, and the failure to prosecute an esports tycoon for running an online gambling house. The article argues that online gambling companies use cultural reframing strategies to avoid monitoring systems and that the political and economic impact of esports in China may contribute to this lack of enforcement. This article sheds light on the potential implications of the lack of regulation of online gambling in the Chinese esports industry.
{"title":"CHINESE ONLINE GAMBLING ESPORTS REGULATIONS: WHO IS TARGETED FOR CRACKDOWNS? WHY ARE THERE DOUBLE STANDARDS?","authors":"Junqing Zhang","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2023.0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.0010","url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the lack of strict enforcement of online gambling regulations in the Chinese esports industry despite the establishment of relevant regulations. The lack of criminal or administrative penalties for online gambling related to esports is demonstrated through three examples in this article: Chinese esports teams accepting sponsorships from online gambling companies, the lack of punishment for Chinese esports players involved in match-fixing, and the failure to prosecute an esports tycoon for running an online gambling house. The article argues that online gambling companies use cultural reframing strategies to avoid monitoring systems and that the political and economic impact of esports in China may contribute to this lack of enforcement. This article sheds light on the potential implications of the lack of regulation of online gambling in the Chinese esports industry.","PeriodicalId":44210,"journal":{"name":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135012021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In March 2022, the highest administrative court in the Netherlands, the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State, found that loot boxes in the Ultimate Team Mode of the FIFA video games (FUT) published by Electronic Arts (EA) did not contravene Dutch gambling law, contrary to the Netherlands Gambling Authority's (Kansspelautoriteit) previous 2018 interpretation of the law and overruling a previous 2020 judgment that confirmed the Kansspelautoriteit's aforementioned interpretation. The Council of State decided that the player packs (i.e., loot boxes) in the FUT mode cannot be considered a separate game that is capable of being assessed on its own as to whether it constitutes a “game of chance” and therefore potentially contravenes gambling regulation. Instead, the overarching video game containing the loot boxes should be assessed more broadly as to whether that game constitutes a “game of chance” or a “game of skill.” We argue that the Council of State's unique approach of not considering the loot boxes separately as to whether they constitute gambling underplayed the importance of paid loot boxes as a monetization method in contemporary video games. The Council of State unsatisfyingly built its main argument on the supposed “importance” of non-paid loot boxes. Further, the Council of State's overreliance on how the so-called “majority” of players experience the video game importantly failed to account for the experiences of the small minority of high-spending players who are most at risk of potential harms and in need of consumer protection. The Council of State's interpretation of Dutch gambling law should not necessarily be relied on by other countries considering the regulation of loot boxes. Dutch legislators should consider whether this restrictive interpretation, which has made future application of gambling regulation to loot boxes highly unlikely, was intended and may require legislative amendments.1
{"title":"PAID VIDEO GAME LOOT BOXES ARE NOT GAMBLING UNDER DUTCH GAMBLING REGULATION? SHIFTING THE GOALPOST IN <i>ELECTRONIC ARTS V. KANSSPELAUTORITEIT</i>","authors":"Leon Y. Xiao, Pieterjan Declerck","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2023.0020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.0020","url":null,"abstract":"In March 2022, the highest administrative court in the Netherlands, the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State, found that loot boxes in the Ultimate Team Mode of the FIFA video games (FUT) published by Electronic Arts (EA) did not contravene Dutch gambling law, contrary to the Netherlands Gambling Authority's (Kansspelautoriteit) previous 2018 interpretation of the law and overruling a previous 2020 judgment that confirmed the Kansspelautoriteit's aforementioned interpretation. The Council of State decided that the player packs (i.e., loot boxes) in the FUT mode cannot be considered a separate game that is capable of being assessed on its own as to whether it constitutes a “game of chance” and therefore potentially contravenes gambling regulation. Instead, the overarching video game containing the loot boxes should be assessed more broadly as to whether that game constitutes a “game of chance” or a “game of skill.” We argue that the Council of State's unique approach of not considering the loot boxes separately as to whether they constitute gambling underplayed the importance of paid loot boxes as a monetization method in contemporary video games. The Council of State unsatisfyingly built its main argument on the supposed “importance” of non-paid loot boxes. Further, the Council of State's overreliance on how the so-called “majority” of players experience the video game importantly failed to account for the experiences of the small minority of high-spending players who are most at risk of potential harms and in need of consumer protection. The Council of State's interpretation of Dutch gambling law should not necessarily be relied on by other countries considering the regulation of loot boxes. Dutch legislators should consider whether this restrictive interpretation, which has made future application of gambling regulation to loot boxes highly unlikely, was intended and may require legislative amendments.1","PeriodicalId":44210,"journal":{"name":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135112329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-01DOI: 10.1089/glr2.2023.29090.int
Jamie Salsburg, Kim Lund
Gaming Law ReviewVol. 27, No. 8 CommentariesAN INTERVIEW WITH KIM LUNDInterviewer: Jamie Salsburg and Interviewee: Kim LundInterviewer: Jamie SalsburgJamie Salsburg is a Brand Strategist and the Founder of Dyve Agency.Search for more papers by this author and Interviewee: Kim LundKim Lund is Chief Executive Officer and Director at Aftermath Interactive AB, Sweden.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:12 Oct 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29090.intAboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View articleFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 27Issue 8Oct 2023 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Interviewer: Jamie Salsburg and Interviewee: Kim Lund.AN INTERVIEW WITH KIM LUND.Gaming Law Review.Oct 2023.396-417.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29090.intPublished in Volume: 27 Issue 8: October 12, 2023Keywordssports advertisingresponsible gamblingonline gamblingsports bettingU.S. gamblingPDF download
{"title":"AN INTERVIEW WITH KIM LUND","authors":"Jamie Salsburg, Kim Lund","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2023.29090.int","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29090.int","url":null,"abstract":"Gaming Law ReviewVol. 27, No. 8 CommentariesAN INTERVIEW WITH KIM LUNDInterviewer: Jamie Salsburg and Interviewee: Kim LundInterviewer: Jamie SalsburgJamie Salsburg is a Brand Strategist and the Founder of Dyve Agency.Search for more papers by this author and Interviewee: Kim LundKim Lund is Chief Executive Officer and Director at Aftermath Interactive AB, Sweden.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:12 Oct 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29090.intAboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View articleFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 27Issue 8Oct 2023 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Interviewer: Jamie Salsburg and Interviewee: Kim Lund.AN INTERVIEW WITH KIM LUND.Gaming Law Review.Oct 2023.396-417.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29090.intPublished in Volume: 27 Issue 8: October 12, 2023Keywordssports advertisingresponsible gamblingonline gamblingsports bettingU.S. gamblingPDF download","PeriodicalId":44210,"journal":{"name":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","volume":"692 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135849982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：