Post-spinal hypotension management for cesarean section in low resource settings: efficiency and safety of two very low-dose boluses of norepinephrine, a randomized double-blinded controlled trial

IF 0.2 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Healthcare in Lowresource Settings Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.4081/hls.2023.11486
Feryel Benamor, Ines Elbekri, Sofiene Benmarzouk, Bochra Fouzai, Takwa Hkiri, Hayene Maghrebi
{"title":"Post-spinal hypotension management for cesarean section in low resource settings: efficiency and safety of two very low-dose boluses of norepinephrine, a randomized double-blinded controlled trial","authors":"Feryel Benamor, Ines Elbekri, Sofiene Benmarzouk, Bochra Fouzai, Takwa Hkiri, Hayene Maghrebi","doi":"10.4081/hls.2023.11486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spinal anesthesia is the gold standard anesthetic technique for cesarean section. However, its major complication is hypotension. Norepinephrine has recently been described as an efficient and safe alternative to Phenylephrine. The aim of this study was to determine the effective target bolus of Norepinephrine to prevent and treat post-spinal anesthesia hypotension. We conducted a prospective controlled randomized study including 126 parturients scheduled for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. We compared two groups that received a prophylactic bolus of either 1μg/kg or 0.5μg/kg of Norepinephrine without fluid loading. The rescue intravenous bolus of Norepinephrine was half the dose of the prophylactic bolus. The main outcomes were the percentage of decrease in systolic and mean blood pressure. The secondary outcomes included the timing of the first hypotension, duration of hypotension, number of rescue boluses, total Norepinephrine consumption, incidence of hypotension and maternal adverse effects and fetal outcomes. Our primary outcome has shown similarities between groups; delta systolic blood pressure before delivery was 19.4% in group 1µg/kg versus 20.5% in group 0.5µg/kg. Both groups were similar for all secondary outcomes, except that the higher dose of Norepinephrine resulted in more hypertension. Fetal outcomes were similar in both groups. Bolus of 0.5μg/kg followed by rescue doses of 0.25μg/kg of Norepinephrine was efficient in preventing and treating spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension. These doses may be recommended for routine use in healthy parturients.","PeriodicalId":30412,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare in Lowresource Settings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare in Lowresource Settings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/hls.2023.11486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spinal anesthesia is the gold standard anesthetic technique for cesarean section. However, its major complication is hypotension. Norepinephrine has recently been described as an efficient and safe alternative to Phenylephrine. The aim of this study was to determine the effective target bolus of Norepinephrine to prevent and treat post-spinal anesthesia hypotension. We conducted a prospective controlled randomized study including 126 parturients scheduled for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. We compared two groups that received a prophylactic bolus of either 1μg/kg or 0.5μg/kg of Norepinephrine without fluid loading. The rescue intravenous bolus of Norepinephrine was half the dose of the prophylactic bolus. The main outcomes were the percentage of decrease in systolic and mean blood pressure. The secondary outcomes included the timing of the first hypotension, duration of hypotension, number of rescue boluses, total Norepinephrine consumption, incidence of hypotension and maternal adverse effects and fetal outcomes. Our primary outcome has shown similarities between groups; delta systolic blood pressure before delivery was 19.4% in group 1µg/kg versus 20.5% in group 0.5µg/kg. Both groups were similar for all secondary outcomes, except that the higher dose of Norepinephrine resulted in more hypertension. Fetal outcomes were similar in both groups. Bolus of 0.5μg/kg followed by rescue doses of 0.25μg/kg of Norepinephrine was efficient in preventing and treating spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension. These doses may be recommended for routine use in healthy parturients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低资源环境下剖宫产术后脊柱低血压管理:两种极低剂量去甲肾上腺素的有效性和安全性,一项随机双盲对照试验
脊髓麻醉是剖宫产术的金标准麻醉技术。然而,其主要并发症是低血压。去甲肾上腺素最近被认为是一种有效和安全的苯肾上腺素替代品。本研究的目的是确定去甲肾上腺素预防和治疗脊髓麻醉后低血压的有效靶量。我们进行了一项前瞻性对照随机研究,包括126例脊柱麻醉下剖宫产的产妇。我们比较了两组接受预防性剂量1μg/kg或0.5μg/kg的去甲肾上腺素,没有液体负荷。去甲肾上腺素的抢救性静脉注射剂量是预防性注射剂量的一半。主要结果是收缩压和平均血压下降的百分比。次要结局包括首次低血压的时间、低血压持续时间、抢救剂量、去甲肾上腺素总消耗量、低血压发生率、母体不良反应和胎儿结局。我们的主要结果显示了各组之间的相似性;1µg/kg组分娩前δ收缩压为19.4%,0.5µg/kg组为20.5%。两组的所有次要结果相似,除了高剂量的去甲肾上腺素导致更多的高血压。两组胎儿结局相似。去甲肾上腺素0.5μg/kg灌注后0.25μg/kg抢救剂量能有效预防和治疗脊髓麻醉所致低血压。这些剂量可推荐用于健康孕妇的常规使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of E-Duva application on knowledge and attitude of visual inspection using acetic acid (VIA) among women of childbearing age The effect of dayak ginger (<i>Zingiber Officinale Roscoe</i>) extraction in ginger cookies in reducing emesis gravidarum severity among pregnant women Maternal knowledge and prescribing practices of antibiotics for childhood infections: a cross-sectional survey in Jordan Increasing young women's knowledge of early marriage issues through audiovisual media intervention The influence of religious well-being on the resilience of family spirituality during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1