Comparison of lung ultrasound scoring systems for the prognosis of COVID-19 in the emergency department: An international prospective cohort study

Peter J Snelling, Philip Jones, Rory Connolly, Tomislav Jelic, Dan Mirsch, Frank Myslik, Luke Phillips, Gabriel Blecher, the COVID LUS Study Group
{"title":"Comparison of lung ultrasound scoring systems for the prognosis of COVID-19 in the emergency department: An international prospective cohort study","authors":"Peter J Snelling,&nbsp;Philip Jones,&nbsp;Rory Connolly,&nbsp;Tomislav Jelic,&nbsp;Dan Mirsch,&nbsp;Frank Myslik,&nbsp;Luke Phillips,&nbsp;Gabriel Blecher,&nbsp;the COVID LUS Study Group","doi":"10.1002/ajum.12364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the lung ultrasound (LUS) scores applied to an international cohort of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected COVID-19, and subsequently admitted with proven disease, could prognosticate clinical outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was an international, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study of patients who received LUS and were followed for the composite primary outcome of intubation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission or death. LUS scores were later applied including two 12-zone protocols (‘de Alencar score’ and ‘CLUE score’), a 12-zone protocol with lung and pleural findings (‘Ji score’) and an 11-zone protocol (‘Tung-Chen score’). The primary analysis comprised logistic regression modelling of the composite primary outcome, with the LUS scores analysed individually as predictor variables.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Between April 2020 to April 2022, 129 patients with COVID-19 had LUS performed according to the protocol and 24 (18.6%) met the composite primary endpoint. No association was seen between the LUS score and the composite primary end point for the de Alencar score [odds ratio (OR) = 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.97–1.11; P = 0.29], the CLUE score (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.96–1.10; P = 0.40), the Ji score (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.97–1.07; P = 0.40) or the Tung-Chen score (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.97–1.08).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Compared to these earlier studies performed at the start of the pandemic, the negative outcome of our study could reflect the changing scenario of the COVID-19 pandemic, including patient, disease, and system factors. The analysis suggests that the study may have been underpowered to detect a weaker association between a LUS score and the primary outcome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In an international cohort of adult patients presenting to the ED with suspected COVID-19 disease who had LUS performed and were subsequently admitted to hospital, LUS severity scores did not prognosticate the need for invasive ventilation, ICU admission or death.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"27 2","pages":"75-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajum.12364","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.12364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the lung ultrasound (LUS) scores applied to an international cohort of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected COVID-19, and subsequently admitted with proven disease, could prognosticate clinical outcomes.

Methods

This was an international, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study of patients who received LUS and were followed for the composite primary outcome of intubation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission or death. LUS scores were later applied including two 12-zone protocols (‘de Alencar score’ and ‘CLUE score’), a 12-zone protocol with lung and pleural findings (‘Ji score’) and an 11-zone protocol (‘Tung-Chen score’). The primary analysis comprised logistic regression modelling of the composite primary outcome, with the LUS scores analysed individually as predictor variables.

Results

Between April 2020 to April 2022, 129 patients with COVID-19 had LUS performed according to the protocol and 24 (18.6%) met the composite primary endpoint. No association was seen between the LUS score and the composite primary end point for the de Alencar score [odds ratio (OR) = 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.97–1.11; P = 0.29], the CLUE score (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.96–1.10; P = 0.40), the Ji score (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.97–1.07; P = 0.40) or the Tung-Chen score (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.97–1.08).

Discussion

Compared to these earlier studies performed at the start of the pandemic, the negative outcome of our study could reflect the changing scenario of the COVID-19 pandemic, including patient, disease, and system factors. The analysis suggests that the study may have been underpowered to detect a weaker association between a LUS score and the primary outcome.

Conclusion

In an international cohort of adult patients presenting to the ED with suspected COVID-19 disease who had LUS performed and were subsequently admitted to hospital, LUS severity scores did not prognosticate the need for invasive ventilation, ICU admission or death.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科COVID-19预后的肺部超声评分系统比较:一项国际前瞻性队列研究
目的 本研究旨在评估对急诊科(ED)疑似 COVID-19 患者进行肺部超声检查(LUS)评分是否能预示临床结果。 方法 这是一项国际性、多中心、前瞻性、观察性队列研究,研究对象是接受 LUS 检查的患者,并对插管、入住重症监护室(ICU)或死亡的综合主要结果进行随访。随后采用的 LUS 评分包括两个 12 区方案("de Alencar 评分 "和 "CLUE 评分")、一个 12 区方案(肺和胸膜检查结果)("Ji 评分")和一个 11 区方案("Tung-Chen 评分")。主要分析包括综合主要结果的逻辑回归建模,并将 LUS 评分作为预测变量进行单独分析。 结果 2020年4月至2022年4月期间,129名COVID-19患者按照方案进行了LUS检查,24人(18.6%)达到了复合主要终点。在 de Alencar 评分[比值比(OR)= 1.04;95% 置信区间(CI):0.97-1.11;P = 0.29]、CLUE 评分(OR = 1.03;95% CI:0.96-1.10;P = 0.40)、Ji 评分(OR = 1.02;95% CI:0.97-1.07;P = 0.40)或 Tung-Chen 评分(OR = 1.02;95% CI:0.97-1.08)。 讨论 与这些早期在大流行开始时进行的研究相比,我们研究的负面结果可能反映了 COVID-19 大流行的变化情况,包括患者、疾病和系统因素。分析表明,该研究的力量可能不足,无法检测到 LUS 评分与主要结果之间较弱的关联。 结论 在一个国际队列中,疑似患有 COVID-19 疾病的成人患者在急诊室就诊并进行了 LUS 检查后入院,LUS 严重程度评分并不能预示患者是否需要进行有创通气、入住重症监护室或死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The impact of ultrasound imaging on patient management – Let's practice the evidence EUS‐guided tissue acquisition from gastric subepithelial lesions—The optimal technique still remains undecided Ultrasound‐assisted and landmark‐based nusinersen delivery in spinal muscular atrophy adults: A retrospective analysis Cutaneous ultrasound in the diagnosis and assessment of inflammatory activity in tinea capitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1