首页 > 最新文献

Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Guidelines for Reprocessing Ultrasound Transducers: 2026 超声换能器再处理指南:2026
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-23 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.70038
Nathan Peters, Marija Juraja, Nicola Isles, Ellen Woodcock, Elissa Kennedy-Smith, Cartan Costello, Jo McCann, Karen Mizia
<div> <section> <h3> Introduction</h3> <p>Ultrasound equipment is recognised as a potential source of harmful microorganisms which could lead to clinical infection. This highlights the importance of standardised infection prevention and control strategies for ultrasound practice across Australia and New Zealand. This revised guideline supersedes the similarly named 2017 guideline and was collaboratively developed by the Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (ASUM) and the Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control (ACIPC).</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>A multidisciplinary working group was assembled consisting of ultrasound practitioners from varying specialty areas and infection control specialists. The guideline recommendations were informed by a review of relevant literature, national and international standards, and current Australian and New Zealand regulatory requirements. A catalyst for the revision of these guidelines was the release of the Australian Standard AS5369:2023—Reprocessing of reusable medical devices and other devices in health and non-health related facilities. Consensus was achieved through structured discussions and iterative drafting including wider stakeholder feedback.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>Recommendations for transducer reprocessing were based on the invasiveness of the ultrasound transducer as well as the type of human tissue it contacted during use. Particular attention is also given to the safe use of ultrasound gel, transducer covers, as well as broader considerations of standard and transmission-based precautions, including the use of aseptic technique.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusion</h3> <p>Implementation of this guideline by ultrasound clinicians and their facilities will reduce the risk of transmission of potentially harmful microorganisms and ensure infection prevention and control practices across Australia and New Zealand are aligned with accepted national standards.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Impact Statement</h3> <p>This guideline outlines the Australian and New Zealand standard for infection prevention and control as it relates to ultrasound practice. This 2026 revision supersedes the similarly named 2017 guideline and was collaboratively developed by the Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (ASUM) and the Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control (ACIPC). The multidisciplinary working group used publishe
超声设备被认为是可能导致临床感染的有害微生物的潜在来源。这突出了标准化感染预防和控制策略在澳大利亚和新西兰超声实践的重要性。修订后的指南取代了同名的2017年指南,由澳大利亚超声医学学会(ASUM)和澳大利亚感染预防与控制学院(ACIPC)合作制定。方法由不同专业领域的超声医师和感染控制专家组成多学科工作组。指南建议是通过对相关文献、国家和国际标准以及当前澳大利亚和新西兰监管要求的审查得出的。修订这些指南的催化剂是澳大利亚标准as5369:2023的发布——卫生和非卫生相关设施中可重复使用的医疗器械和其他器械的再处理。通过有组织的讨论和反复起草,包括更广泛的利益攸关方反馈,达成了共识。结果基于超声换能器的侵入性及其在使用过程中接触的人体组织类型,提出了换能器再处理的建议。还特别注意超声凝胶、换能器盖的安全使用,以及对标准和基于传输的预防措施的更广泛考虑,包括无菌技术的使用。超声临床医生及其设施实施本指南将降低潜在有害微生物传播的风险,并确保澳大利亚和新西兰的感染预防和控制实践与公认的国家标准保持一致。影响声明本指南概述了澳大利亚和新西兰的感染预防和控制标准,因为它与超声实践有关。这项2026年修订取代了类似名称的2017年指南,由澳大利亚超声医学学会(ASUM)和澳大利亚感染预防与控制学院(ACIPC)合作制定。多学科工作组在制定建议时参考了已发表的文献、国家和国际标准以及相关的监管要求。临床医生和使用超声的机构应使用本指南,以减少潜在有害微生物的传播并改善患者护理。
{"title":"Guidelines for Reprocessing Ultrasound Transducers: 2026","authors":"Nathan Peters,&nbsp;Marija Juraja,&nbsp;Nicola Isles,&nbsp;Ellen Woodcock,&nbsp;Elissa Kennedy-Smith,&nbsp;Cartan Costello,&nbsp;Jo McCann,&nbsp;Karen Mizia","doi":"10.1002/ajum.70038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajum.70038","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Introduction&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Ultrasound equipment is recognised as a potential source of harmful microorganisms which could lead to clinical infection. This highlights the importance of standardised infection prevention and control strategies for ultrasound practice across Australia and New Zealand. This revised guideline supersedes the similarly named 2017 guideline and was collaboratively developed by the Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (ASUM) and the Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control (ACIPC).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;A multidisciplinary working group was assembled consisting of ultrasound practitioners from varying specialty areas and infection control specialists. The guideline recommendations were informed by a review of relevant literature, national and international standards, and current Australian and New Zealand regulatory requirements. A catalyst for the revision of these guidelines was the release of the Australian Standard AS5369:2023—Reprocessing of reusable medical devices and other devices in health and non-health related facilities. Consensus was achieved through structured discussions and iterative drafting including wider stakeholder feedback.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Recommendations for transducer reprocessing were based on the invasiveness of the ultrasound transducer as well as the type of human tissue it contacted during use. Particular attention is also given to the safe use of ultrasound gel, transducer covers, as well as broader considerations of standard and transmission-based precautions, including the use of aseptic technique.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Implementation of this guideline by ultrasound clinicians and their facilities will reduce the risk of transmission of potentially harmful microorganisms and ensure infection prevention and control practices across Australia and New Zealand are aligned with accepted national standards.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Impact Statement&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This guideline outlines the Australian and New Zealand standard for infection prevention and control as it relates to ultrasound practice. This 2026 revision supersedes the similarly named 2017 guideline and was collaboratively developed by the Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (ASUM) and the Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control (ACIPC). The multidisciplinary working group used publishe","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"29 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajum.70038","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147288461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adult Ileocolic Intussusception in a Patient With Cystic Fibrosis: Diagnostic Role of Point-of-Care Ultrasound ‘Case Report’ 成人回肠结肠套叠伴囊性纤维化:即时超声诊断作用的病例报告
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-12 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.70036
Ali Al Khalifah, Ali Aldawood

Background

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a multi-system autosomal recessive disorder affecting the respiratory, gastrointestinal and reproductive systems. One of its manifestations is pancreatic insufficiency. This could lead to constipation and impaired intestinal activity predisposing patients to intestinal obstruction and intussusception.

Key Findings

This report discusses a case of a 25-year-old male with CF who presented with abdominal pain and constipation. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) was instrumental in the early diagnosis of intussusception, showing the classical sonographic features of intussusception.

Discussion

This case highlights the importance of clinical vigilance and the utility of POCUS when managing patients with multi-systemic diseases, as they may present with atypical symptoms and rare diagnoses. Ultrasound is highly sensitive for diagnosing intussusception in the paediatric populations, but further studies may be needed to translate that finding to the adult population. Complementary computed tomography (CT) is of high value in evaluating for possible complications.

囊性纤维化(CF)是一种多系统常染色体隐性遗传病,影响呼吸系统、胃肠道和生殖系统。其表现之一是胰腺功能不全。这可能导致便秘和肠道活动受损,使患者易患肠梗阻和肠套叠。本报告讨论了一例25岁的CF男性患者,其表现为腹痛和便秘。即时超声(POCUS)显示肠套叠的经典声像图特征,有助于早期诊断肠套叠。本病例强调了临床警惕的重要性和POCUS在治疗多系统疾病患者时的应用,因为他们可能表现出非典型症状和罕见的诊断。超声对儿科人群的肠套叠诊断高度敏感,但可能需要进一步的研究将这一发现转化为成人人群。补充计算机断层扫描(CT)在评估可能的并发症方面具有很高的价值。
{"title":"Adult Ileocolic Intussusception in a Patient With Cystic Fibrosis: Diagnostic Role of Point-of-Care Ultrasound ‘Case Report’","authors":"Ali Al Khalifah,&nbsp;Ali Aldawood","doi":"10.1002/ajum.70036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajum.70036","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a multi-system autosomal recessive disorder affecting the respiratory, gastrointestinal and reproductive systems. One of its manifestations is pancreatic insufficiency. This could lead to constipation and impaired intestinal activity predisposing patients to intestinal obstruction and intussusception.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Key Findings</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This report discusses a case of a 25-year-old male with CF who presented with abdominal pain and constipation. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) was instrumental in the early diagnosis of intussusception, showing the classical sonographic features of intussusception.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This case highlights the importance of clinical vigilance and the utility of POCUS when managing patients with multi-systemic diseases, as they may present with atypical symptoms and rare diagnoses. Ultrasound is highly sensitive for diagnosing intussusception in the paediatric populations, but further studies may be needed to translate that finding to the adult population. Complementary computed tomography (CT) is of high value in evaluating for possible complications.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"29 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146193523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changes in Intrauterine Device Position From Initial Insertion to Check Up 宫内节育器位置从最初插入到检查的变化。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.70035
Grace Swain, Karen Mizia, Elizabeth Luxford
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>There is some evidence of intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs) migrating after insertion; however, these studies had small sample sizes and have not been performed with an Australian population. Furthermore, current guidelines for IUDs provide ambiguous recommendations for post-procedure check-ups 5–8 weeks after insertion. In some cases, it is unclear if a pelvic ultrasound should be used to ascertain IUD position. The clinical usefulness of ultrasound as the primary post-procedure investigation has not been fully elucidated, nor has the migration and position change in an Australian population.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Aim</h3> <p>To evaluate the migration or change in position of IUDs in an Australian population, and the clinical usefulness of a post-procedure check with an ultrasound following insertion.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>A retrospective cohort study over 3 years across eight Sydney sites by multiple practitioners.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>645 cases were referred for insertion or IUD exchange under ultrasound. In 5% of cases the device was sub-optimally positioned at the time of insertion. On post-procedure follow-up, of the IUDs in the optimal position, 98.5% remained unchanged. 1.3% changed to a suboptimal position, but of these 75% had an underlying uterine anomaly. Of the devices that were sub-optimally positioned at time of insertion, 84% migrated to the optimal fundal position; those unchanged from suboptimal (16%) had anomalies or other causes identified.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusion</h3> <p>Once an IUD is inserted into an appropriate position in the fundus, it is extremely unlikely to change position unless the patient has an underlying structural anomaly or a previous hysterotomy. Fundal positioning at the initial insertion was 95%, which on post-procedure check-up improved to 98.7% of cases. Reassuringly, of the IUDs which were sub-optimally positioned, 84% improved their position to an appropriate location 5–8 weeks later. This also suggests migration of devices into an optimal position. With this evidence that most IUDs will migrate to a more appropriate position, we suggest all guidelines remove the 4–8 week check, and that to perform an ultrasound only if symptomatic or if unable to palpate the IUD strings.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Impact Statement</h3> <p>This study evaluates the migration or change in position of intrauterine contraceptio
背景:有一些证据表明,宫内节育器(iud)在插入后迁移;然而,这些研究的样本量很小,并且没有在澳大利亚人群中进行。此外,目前的宫内节育器指南对插入后5-8周的术后检查提供了模糊的建议。在某些情况下,不清楚是否应该使用盆腔超声来确定宫内节育器的位置。超声作为主要术后检查的临床用途尚未完全阐明,澳大利亚人群的迁移和位置变化也尚未完全阐明。目的:评估澳大利亚人群中宫内节育器的移动或位置变化,以及植入后超声检查的临床应用价值。方法:一项回顾性队列研究,由多名医生在悉尼8个地点进行了3年多的研究。结果:645例患者行超声置入或宫内节育器置换术。在5%的情况下,装置在插入时定位不理想。术后随访时,放置在最佳位置的宫内节育器,98.5%保持不变。1.3%变为次优位,但其中75%有潜在的子宫异常。在插入时定位为次优的器械中,84%的器械迁移到最佳的基础位置;那些从次优(16%)改变的患者有异常或其他原因。结论:一旦宫内节育器插入到眼底的适当位置,除非患者有潜在的结构异常或以前的子宫切开术,否则它极不可能改变位置。初始插入时的底部定位率为95%,术后检查时提高到98.7%。令人欣慰的是,在放置位置不理想的宫内节育器中,84%在5-8周后将其放置到合适的位置。这也建议将设备迁移到最佳位置。有证据表明大多数宫内节育器会移动到更合适的位置,我们建议所有指南取消4-8周检查,并且只有在有症状或无法触诊宫内节育器串时才进行超声检查。影响声明:本研究评估了澳大利亚人群首次插入宫内节育器后的移动或位置变化,以及术后超声检查的临床实用性。目前澳大利亚的指导方针并没有明确说明在手术后检查中是否需要超声波。这项研究表明,超声检查并不是术后检查的必要组成部分,因为绝大多数宫内节育器在插入后的两个月内会移动到合适的位置。
{"title":"Changes in Intrauterine Device Position From Initial Insertion to Check Up","authors":"Grace Swain,&nbsp;Karen Mizia,&nbsp;Elizabeth Luxford","doi":"10.1002/ajum.70035","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajum.70035","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;There is some evidence of intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs) migrating after insertion; however, these studies had small sample sizes and have not been performed with an Australian population. Furthermore, current guidelines for IUDs provide ambiguous recommendations for post-procedure check-ups 5–8 weeks after insertion. In some cases, it is unclear if a pelvic ultrasound should be used to ascertain IUD position. The clinical usefulness of ultrasound as the primary post-procedure investigation has not been fully elucidated, nor has the migration and position change in an Australian population.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Aim&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;To evaluate the migration or change in position of IUDs in an Australian population, and the clinical usefulness of a post-procedure check with an ultrasound following insertion.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;A retrospective cohort study over 3 years across eight Sydney sites by multiple practitioners.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;645 cases were referred for insertion or IUD exchange under ultrasound. In 5% of cases the device was sub-optimally positioned at the time of insertion. On post-procedure follow-up, of the IUDs in the optimal position, 98.5% remained unchanged. 1.3% changed to a suboptimal position, but of these 75% had an underlying uterine anomaly. Of the devices that were sub-optimally positioned at time of insertion, 84% migrated to the optimal fundal position; those unchanged from suboptimal (16%) had anomalies or other causes identified.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Once an IUD is inserted into an appropriate position in the fundus, it is extremely unlikely to change position unless the patient has an underlying structural anomaly or a previous hysterotomy. Fundal positioning at the initial insertion was 95%, which on post-procedure check-up improved to 98.7% of cases. Reassuringly, of the IUDs which were sub-optimally positioned, 84% improved their position to an appropriate location 5–8 weeks later. This also suggests migration of devices into an optimal position. With this evidence that most IUDs will migrate to a more appropriate position, we suggest all guidelines remove the 4–8 week check, and that to perform an ultrasound only if symptomatic or if unable to palpate the IUD strings.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Impact Statement&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This study evaluates the migration or change in position of intrauterine contraceptio","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146114387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound-Generated Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index in the Prediction of Post-Induction Hypotension During General Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 超声下腔静脉塌陷指数预测全麻诱导后低血压的诊断准确性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.70033
Mitchell Kitchin Gordon, Aharon Golod, Renee Rostolis, Tim Outhred,  Rebecca Caragata, Raymond Hu

Introduction

Post-induction hypotension (PIH) is a common complication following anaesthetic induction and is associated with adverse perioperative outcomes. Ultrasound-generated inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) is a non-invasive measure of volume status that may predict PIH. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of IVC-CI in predicting PIH in adult, non-obstetric patients undergoing general anaesthesia.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library (up to June 2024) identified studies reporting IVC-CI as a predictor of PIH. Prospective and retrospective observational studies were included, while studies involving paediatric, obstetric, or hypotensive patients pre-induction were excluded. The QUADAS-2 tool assessed risk of bias and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was utilised to assess certainty of evidence. Pooled diagnostic performance was measured via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Meta-regression explored heterogeneity across studies.

Results

Twenty-three studies (n = 1973) were included, with 16 studies (n = 1585) providing AUROC data. The pooled AUROC for IVC-CI in predicting PIH was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.64–0.80), indicating moderate diagnostic accuracy. High heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 94.4%). Meta-regression showed no significant associations between AUROC and age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, or induction agents. Publication bias was identified (Egger's test, p < 0.001). The quality of evidence, as evaluated using the GRADE approach, was ‘very low’.

Discussion

IVC-CI shows potential as a predictive tool for PIH; however, significant heterogeneity, inconsistent protocols, and publication bias limit its robustness. Standardised measurement methods and larger studies are needed to confirm its clinical utility.

Conclusion

Ultrasound-generated IVC-CI demonstrates moderate accuracy in predicting PIH and may assist in guiding pre-induction management strategies, such as fluid administration or vasopressor use.

诱导后低血压(PIH)是麻醉诱导后常见的并发症,与不良围手术期预后相关。超声产生的下腔静脉坍缩指数(IVC-CI)是一种无创的容积状态测量方法,可以预测PIH。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了IVC-CI在预测接受全身麻醉的成人非产科患者PIH中的诊断准确性。方法:系统检索PubMed, Embase和Cochrane图书馆(截至2024年6月),确定将IVC-CI报告为PIH预测因子的研究。前瞻性和回顾性观察性研究被纳入,而涉及儿科、产科或低血压患者诱导前的研究被排除。使用QUADAS-2工具评估偏倚风险,使用建议、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)框架评估证据的确定性。通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)测量合并诊断效果。meta回归探讨了研究间的异质性。结果:纳入23项研究(n = 1973),其中16项研究(n = 1585)提供AUROC数据。IVC-CI预测PIH的总AUROC为0.72 (95% CI, 0.64-0.80),表明诊断准确性中等。异质性较高(i2 = 94.4%)。meta回归显示AUROC与年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师协会地位或诱导剂之间无显著关联。讨论:IVC-CI显示了作为PIH预测工具的潜力;然而,显著的异质性、不一致的方案和发表偏倚限制了其稳健性。需要标准化的测量方法和更大规模的研究来证实其临床应用。结论:超声产生的IVC-CI在预测PIH方面具有中等准确性,可能有助于指导诱导前的管理策略,如液体给药或血管加压药的使用。
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound-Generated Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index in the Prediction of Post-Induction Hypotension During General Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Mitchell Kitchin Gordon,&nbsp;Aharon Golod,&nbsp;Renee Rostolis,&nbsp;Tim Outhred,&nbsp; Rebecca Caragata,&nbsp;Raymond Hu","doi":"10.1002/ajum.70033","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajum.70033","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Post-induction hypotension (PIH) is a common complication following anaesthetic induction and is associated with adverse perioperative outcomes. Ultrasound-generated inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) is a non-invasive measure of volume status that may predict PIH. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of IVC-CI in predicting PIH in adult, non-obstetric patients undergoing general anaesthesia.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library (up to June 2024) identified studies reporting IVC-CI as a predictor of PIH. Prospective and retrospective observational studies were included, while studies involving paediatric, obstetric, or hypotensive patients pre-induction were excluded. The QUADAS-2 tool assessed risk of bias and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was utilised to assess certainty of evidence. Pooled diagnostic performance was measured via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Meta-regression explored heterogeneity across studies.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Twenty-three studies (<i>n</i> = 1973) were included, with 16 studies (<i>n</i> = 1585) providing AUROC data. The pooled AUROC for IVC-CI in predicting PIH was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.64–0.80), indicating moderate diagnostic accuracy. High heterogeneity was observed (<i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 94.4%). Meta-regression showed no significant associations between AUROC and age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, or induction agents. Publication bias was identified (Egger's test, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The quality of evidence, as evaluated using the GRADE approach, was ‘very low’.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>IVC-CI shows potential as a predictive tool for PIH; however, significant heterogeneity, inconsistent protocols, and publication bias limit its robustness. Standardised measurement methods and larger studies are needed to confirm its clinical utility.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Ultrasound-generated IVC-CI demonstrates moderate accuracy in predicting PIH and may assist in guiding pre-induction management strategies, such as fluid administration or vasopressor use.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146107663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lung Ultrasound Training: A Scoping Review of Educational Interventions and Outcomes 肺超声训练:教育干预和结果的范围综述。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2026-01-05 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.70031
Patrick Lavoie, Maude Crétaz, Élisabeth Quesnel, Jessica Van Tassel, Claudie Roussy, Christina Dagher, André Denault, Tanya Mailhot

Background

Lung ultrasound (LUS) is increasingly recognised as an essential diagnostic and monitoring tool in acute and critical care. As its use grows, understanding how LUS education is designed, delivered, and evaluated for practicing healthcare professionals has become essential.

Objective

To map the evidence on educational interventions for LUS training, focusing on study characteristics, instructional strategies, and learning outcomes.

Methods

This scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. It identified and charted studies on LUS training for practicing healthcare professionals. Data extraction covered study characteristics, learner profiles, instructional strategies, instructor credentials, training duration and setting, and learning outcomes, categorised using the New World Kirkpatrick Model.

Results

Thirty eight studies involving physicians, paramedics, respiratory therapists, physiotherapists, and nurses met inclusion criteria. Most interventions combined didactic teaching with hands-on practice, including supervised scanning and simulation. Training was typically brief (median duration = 3.5 h). Outcomes focused mainly on learning (Level 2: 86.8%) and less often on behaviour (Level 3: 47.4%). Considerable variation in educational designs and outcome measures limited cross-study comparisons, and few studies assessed long-term retention or clinical impact.

Conclusion

Current LUS training uses multimodal approaches that integrate theory with supervised practice. However, programs and assessments remain heterogeneous and rarely theory-informed. Future research should strengthen pedagogical foundations, align evaluation with competency frameworks, and examine learning sustainability, interprofessional training, and patient-centred outcomes to support effective and scalable LUS education.

背景:肺超声(LUS)越来越被认为是急性和危重症护理中必不可少的诊断和监测工具。随着其使用的增长,了解如何为执业医疗保健专业人员设计、交付和评估LUS教育已变得至关重要。目的:通过研究特征、教学策略和学习成果,绘制出美国学生培训教育干预的证据图谱。方法:本综述遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法和PRISMA-ScR报告指南。它确定并绘制了针对执业医疗保健专业人员的LUS培训的研究。数据提取包括学习特征、学习者概况、教学策略、教师证书、培训时间和设置以及学习成果,并使用新世界柯克帕特里克模型进行分类。结果:38项涉及医生、护理人员、呼吸治疗师、物理治疗师和护士的研究符合纳入标准。大多数干预措施将教学与实践相结合,包括监督扫描和模拟。训练通常很短(中位数持续时间= 3.5小时)。结果主要集中在学习上(水平2:86.8%),较少关注行为(水平3:47.4%)。教育设计和结果测量的巨大差异限制了交叉研究的比较,很少有研究评估长期保留或临床影响。结论:目前的LUS培训采用多模式方法,将理论与监督实践相结合。然而,项目和评估仍然是异质的,很少有理论依据。未来的研究应加强教学基础,使评估与能力框架保持一致,并检查学习可持续性,跨专业培训和以患者为中心的结果,以支持有效和可扩展的LUS教育。
{"title":"Lung Ultrasound Training: A Scoping Review of Educational Interventions and Outcomes","authors":"Patrick Lavoie,&nbsp;Maude Crétaz,&nbsp;Élisabeth Quesnel,&nbsp;Jessica Van Tassel,&nbsp;Claudie Roussy,&nbsp;Christina Dagher,&nbsp;André Denault,&nbsp;Tanya Mailhot","doi":"10.1002/ajum.70031","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajum.70031","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Lung ultrasound (LUS) is increasingly recognised as an essential diagnostic and monitoring tool in acute and critical care. As its use grows, understanding how LUS education is designed, delivered, and evaluated for practicing healthcare professionals has become essential.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To map the evidence on educational interventions for LUS training, focusing on study characteristics, instructional strategies, and learning outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. It identified and charted studies on LUS training for practicing healthcare professionals. Data extraction covered study characteristics, learner profiles, instructional strategies, instructor credentials, training duration and setting, and learning outcomes, categorised using the New World Kirkpatrick Model.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Thirty eight studies involving physicians, paramedics, respiratory therapists, physiotherapists, and nurses met inclusion criteria. Most interventions combined didactic teaching with hands-on practice, including supervised scanning and simulation. Training was typically brief (median duration = 3.5 h). Outcomes focused mainly on learning (Level 2: 86.8%) and less often on behaviour (Level 3: 47.4%). Considerable variation in educational designs and outcome measures limited cross-study comparisons, and few studies assessed long-term retention or clinical impact.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Current LUS training uses multimodal approaches that integrate theory with supervised practice. However, programs and assessments remain heterogeneous and rarely theory-informed. Future research should strengthen pedagogical foundations, align evaluation with competency frameworks, and examine learning sustainability, interprofessional training, and patient-centred outcomes to support effective and scalable LUS education.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12771659/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145918595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measurement of Supraspinatus Tear Size Using Previously Acquired Ultrasound Images Obtained by Multiple Examiners 测量冈上肌撕裂大小使用先前获得的超声图像获得多个检查。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-22 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.70029
Christopher M. Gibbs, Luke T. Mattar, Satoshi Takeuchi, Robert T. Tisherman, Adam J. Popchak, Andrew C. Cordle, James J. Irrgang, Volker Musahl, Richard E. Debski

Introduction/Purpose

One examiner might not be able to acquire and interpret every image when examining rotator cuff tears in large cohort studies due to logistical issues. The aim of this study was to determine the repeatability of supraspinatus tear size measurements performed by multiple observers using previously acquired ultrasound images by a separate set of examiners.

Methods

Seventy-two ultrasound examinations of individuals with symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tears were performed by five ultrasound examiners. Fifteen examinations were randomly chosen to be evaluated by three observers with varying amounts of ultrasound experience using repeated measurements. The maximum anterior–posterior tear size using these previously acquired ultrasound examinations was assessed and the repeatability and minimal detectable change were calculated.

Results

The intra-observer repeatability was improved with greater experience to 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.95) but was 0.51 (95% CI 0.20–0.77) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.51–0.90) for observers with low experience. For all observers, the inter-observer repeatability was 0.32 (95% CI 0.00–0.65). For all observers, the minimal detectable change was 4.6 mm and was lower in observers with more experience.

Discussion

Changes in supraspinatus tear size of 4.6 mm can be detected using previously acquired ultrasound images. This is comparable to ultrasound examinations performed and measured by the same individual as previously reported in the literature. Repeatability is poor among examiners with less experience.

Conclusion

Clinical studies that cannot utilise measurements by a single examiner can be performed within current thresholds for determining changes in tear size of the supraspinatus tendon.

Level of Evidence

III.

简介/目的:由于后勤问题,在大型队列研究中,当检查肩袖撕裂时,一个检查者可能无法获取和解释每一张图像。本研究的目的是确定冈上肌撕裂大小测量的可重复性,由多个观察者使用先前获得的超声图像由一组单独的检查人员执行。方法:对72例有症状的孤立性冈上肌撕裂患者进行超声检查。随机选择15项检查,由三名具有不同超声经验的观察者通过重复测量来评估。利用这些先前获得的超声检查评估最大前后撕裂大小,并计算重复性和最小可检测变化。结果:随着经验的增加,观察者内部的重复性提高到0.87(95%可信区间[CI] 0.72-0.95),但对于经验较低的观察者,重复性为0.51 (95% CI 0.20-0.77)和0.75 (95% CI 0.51-0.90)。对于所有观察者,观察者间的重复性为0.32 (95% CI 0.00-0.65)。对于所有观察者来说,最小的可检测变化为4.6毫米,经验丰富的观察者则更低。讨论:使用先前获得的超声图像可以检测到冈上肌撕裂大小4.6 mm的变化。这与以前文献中报道的由同一个人进行和测量的超声检查相当。经验不足的审查员的可重复性很差。结论:不能利用单个检查者测量的临床研究可以在当前阈值范围内进行,以确定冈上肌腱撕裂大小的变化。证据水平:III。
{"title":"Measurement of Supraspinatus Tear Size Using Previously Acquired Ultrasound Images Obtained by Multiple Examiners","authors":"Christopher M. Gibbs,&nbsp;Luke T. Mattar,&nbsp;Satoshi Takeuchi,&nbsp;Robert T. Tisherman,&nbsp;Adam J. Popchak,&nbsp;Andrew C. Cordle,&nbsp;James J. Irrgang,&nbsp;Volker Musahl,&nbsp;Richard E. Debski","doi":"10.1002/ajum.70029","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajum.70029","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction/Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>One examiner might not be able to acquire and interpret every image when examining rotator cuff tears in large cohort studies due to logistical issues. The aim of this study was to determine the repeatability of supraspinatus tear size measurements performed by multiple observers using previously acquired ultrasound images by a separate set of examiners.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Seventy-two ultrasound examinations of individuals with symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tears were performed by five ultrasound examiners. Fifteen examinations were randomly chosen to be evaluated by three observers with varying amounts of ultrasound experience using repeated measurements. The maximum anterior–posterior tear size using these previously acquired ultrasound examinations was assessed and the repeatability and minimal detectable change were calculated.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The intra-observer repeatability was improved with greater experience to 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.95) but was 0.51 (95% CI 0.20–0.77) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.51–0.90) for observers with low experience. For all observers, the inter-observer repeatability was 0.32 (95% CI 0.00–0.65). For all observers, the minimal detectable change was 4.6 mm and was lower in observers with more experience.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Changes in supraspinatus tear size of 4.6 mm can be detected using previously acquired ultrasound images. This is comparable to ultrasound examinations performed and measured by the same individual as previously reported in the literature. Repeatability is poor among examiners with less experience.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Clinical studies that cannot utilise measurements by a single examiner can be performed within current thresholds for determining changes in tear size of the supraspinatus tendon.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>III.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145828766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Paramedic Echocardiography in Pulseless Electrical Activity Cardiac Arrest: An Education and Simulation Study 无脉电活动心脏骤停的医护超声心动图:教育和模拟研究。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-12-22 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.70032
Hannah E. Latta, Andrew H. Swain, Nick Garrett, Bronwyn Tunnage

Background

Patients presenting with pulseless electrical activity (PEA) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may receive inappropriate care if a manual pulse check is relied upon to determine pulselessness. This study aimed to investigate whether ultrasound-naïve paramedics could acquire an ultrasound image within a 10-s pause during a pulse check in a simulated cardiac arrest environment and interpret ultrasound-detectable pathology. Secondary aims focus on the quality of ultrasound image acquisition and the retention of learned knowledge.

Method

Thirty paramedics participated in three sequential phases. Phase I involved a self-directed e-learning program covering an overview of ultrasound applications, including cultural considerations for indigenous New Zealand Māori in cardiac arrest. Phase II included face-to-face education, simulation assessments, and a knowledge quiz. Phase III included simulation assessments and a knowledge quiz. Ultrasound images were scored against the cardiac ultrasound structural assessment score (CUSAS) for quality.

Results

During simulated cardiac arrest scenarios, the mean time to acquire an ultrasound scan was 9.6 s (SD = 2.9, 95% CI [9.3, 10.0]). Forty-seven per cent of study scans were captured within the 10-s pulse check pause. Of the acquired images, 73% (95% CI [67.8, 79.4]) of scans scored a CUSAS of ≥ 3, demonstrating adequate image quality. Participants correctly interpreted 91% (95% CI [88.5, 94.5]) of 243 pathological scans during the simulations. In Phase II, 83 of 87 interpretations were correct (95%, 95% CI [91.0, 99.7]), while in Phase III, 140 of 156 interpretations were correct (90%, 95% CI [84.9, 94.4]).

Conclusions

During cardiac arrest simulations, paramedics on average took 9.6 s to acquire an ultrasound scan, with 47% of scans completed within the 10-s pulse-check pause.

Research Aims

To determine if paramedics can acquire an ultrasound image within the 10-s pulse check pause in simulated pulseless electrical activity (PEA) cardiac arrest. Secondary aims focus on the quality of ultrasound image acquisition, interpretation and retention of learned knowledge.

背景:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)中出现无脉电活动(PEA)的患者,如果依靠手动脉搏检查来确定无脉,可能会得到不适当的治疗。本研究旨在探讨ultrasound-naïve护理人员是否可以在模拟心脏骤停环境中进行脉搏检查时获得10秒暂停的超声图像,并解释超声可检测的病理。第二个目标是关注超声图像采集的质量和所学知识的保留。方法:30名护理人员依次参与三个阶段。第一阶段涉及一个自我指导的电子学习计划,涵盖超声应用概述,包括新西兰土著在心脏骤停中的文化考虑Māori。第二阶段包括面对面教育、模拟评估和知识测验。第三阶段包括模拟评估和知识测验。根据心脏超声结构评估评分(CUSAS)对超声图像进行质量评分。结果:在模拟心脏骤停的情况下,获得超声扫描的平均时间为9.6 s (SD = 2.9, 95% CI[9.3, 10.0])。47%的研究扫描是在10秒的脉搏检查暂停期间捕获的。在获得的图像中,73% (95% CI[67.8, 79.4])的扫描评分为CUSAS≥3,表明足够的图像质量。在模拟过程中,参与者正确解释了243个病理扫描的91% (95% CI[88.5, 94.5])。在II期,87个解释中有83个是正确的(95%,95% CI[91.0, 99.7]),而在III期,156个解释中有140个是正确的(90%,95% CI[84.9, 94.4])。结论:在心脏骤停模拟过程中,护理人员平均花费9.6秒进行超声扫描,47%的扫描在10秒的脉冲检查暂停时间内完成。研究目的:确定护理人员是否可以在模拟无脉电活动(PEA)心脏骤停的10秒脉冲检查暂停期间获得超声图像。次要目标集中在超声图像的采集,解释和保留所学知识的质量。
{"title":"Paramedic Echocardiography in Pulseless Electrical Activity Cardiac Arrest: An Education and Simulation Study","authors":"Hannah E. Latta,&nbsp;Andrew H. Swain,&nbsp;Nick Garrett,&nbsp;Bronwyn Tunnage","doi":"10.1002/ajum.70032","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajum.70032","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patients presenting with pulseless electrical activity (PEA) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may receive inappropriate care if a manual pulse check is relied upon to determine pulselessness. This study aimed to investigate whether ultrasound-naïve paramedics could acquire an ultrasound image within a 10-s pause during a pulse check in a simulated cardiac arrest environment and interpret ultrasound-detectable pathology. Secondary aims focus on the quality of ultrasound image acquisition and the retention of learned knowledge.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Thirty paramedics participated in three sequential phases. Phase I involved a self-directed e-learning program covering an overview of ultrasound applications, including cultural considerations for indigenous New Zealand Māori in cardiac arrest. Phase II included face-to-face education, simulation assessments, and a knowledge quiz. Phase III included simulation assessments and a knowledge quiz. Ultrasound images were scored against the cardiac ultrasound structural assessment score (CUSAS) for quality.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>During simulated cardiac arrest scenarios, the mean time to acquire an ultrasound scan was 9.6 s (SD = 2.9, 95% CI [9.3, 10.0]). Forty-seven per cent of study scans were captured within the 10-s pulse check pause. Of the acquired images, 73% (95% CI [67.8, 79.4]) of scans scored a CUSAS of ≥ 3, demonstrating adequate image quality. Participants correctly interpreted 91% (95% CI [88.5, 94.5]) of 243 pathological scans during the simulations. In Phase II, 83 of 87 interpretations were correct (95%, 95% CI [91.0, 99.7]), while in Phase III, 140 of 156 interpretations were correct (90%, 95% CI [84.9, 94.4]).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>During cardiac arrest simulations, paramedics on average took 9.6 s to acquire an ultrasound scan, with 47% of scans completed within the 10-s pulse-check pause.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Research Aims</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To determine if paramedics can acquire an ultrasound image within the 10-s pulse check pause in simulated pulseless electrical activity (PEA) cardiac arrest. Secondary aims focus on the quality of ultrasound image acquisition, interpretation and retention of learned knowledge.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145828744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact Evaluation After Implementing a Co-Designed Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Program at a Veterans Affairs Emergency Department 在退伍军人事务急诊科实施共同设计的护理点超声计划后的影响评估。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-09 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.70024
Rebecca G. Theophanous, Catherine A. Staton, Anna Tupetz, Luna Ragsdale, Erica Peethumnongsin, Alexander Gordee, Maragatha Kuchibhatla, Stephanie A. Eucker

Introduction/Purpose

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an important diagnostic bedside tool, yet a gap remains between Emergency Department (ED) POCUS programme implementation and achieving sustained POCUS use and retention. We performed an impact evaluation of a co-designed POCUS programme implementation intervention and assessed programme acceptability, effectiveness and feasibility.

Methods

Our mixed-methods cohort study implemented a co-designed, multifaceted intervention using the consolidated framework for implementation research at a single Veterans Affairs ED (November 2021–October 2022) to enhance POCUS usability and sustainability, including provider education, image review and archival. Primary ED providers (20/25) participated in hands-on POCUS training sessions between February and May 2022. We assessed POCUS program acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility via provider pre/post-course surveys, interviews, and health record data using a validated tool (AIM-IAM-FIM; assessing ED POCUS, radiology ultrasound orders, and ED metrics).

Results

ED POCUS significantly increased (from 72 to 267 scans, p < 0.001) 6 months post-intervention, with no significant change in radiology ultrasounds ordered (from 355 to 361, p = 0.417) or ED length-of-stay (from 6.7 to 7.5 h, p = 0.0849). Cardiac, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), soft tissue, musculoskeletal, and biliary ED POCUS were most common; and radiology studies were DVT, biliary and scrotal ultrasound. The pre/post-intervention surveys showed provider comfort with performing and teaching diagnostic and procedural POCUS changed minimally. All respondents approved of POCUS use and education (acceptability), endorsed clinical tool applicability (appropriateness) and stated the course/training was doable (feasibility).

Discussion/Conclusions

POCUS use increased post-program implementation. Future studies should evaluate program sustainability, incorporate methods to reduce radiology ultrasound and improve patient-centered outcomes.

简介/目的:即时超声(POCUS)是一种重要的床边诊断工具,然而急诊科POCUS项目的实施与实现持续的POCUS使用和保留之间仍然存在差距。我们对共同设计的POCUS项目实施干预进行了影响评估,并评估了项目的可接受性、有效性和可行性。方法:我们的混合方法队列研究实施了一项共同设计的、多方面的干预措施,使用统一的框架进行实施研究,在一个退伍军人事务部ED(2021年11月至2022年10月),以提高POCUS的可用性和可持续性,包括提供者教育、图像审查和存档。初级教育提供者(20/25)在2022年2月至5月期间参加了动手POCUS培训课程。我们使用一种经过验证的工具(AIM-IAM-FIM;评估ED POCUS、放射学超声指令和ED指标),通过提供者课程前/课程后调查、访谈和健康记录数据,评估POCUS方案的可接受性、适当性和可行性。结果:ED POCUS(从72次扫描增加到267次扫描,p p = 0.417)或ED停留时间(从6.7小时增加到7.5小时,p = 0.0849)显著增加。心脏、深静脉血栓(DVT)、软组织、肌肉骨骼和胆道ED POCUS最为常见;放射学检查是DVT,胆道和阴囊超声。干预前/干预后调查显示,提供者对诊断性和程序性POCUS的执行和教学的满意度变化最小。所有受访者都认可POCUS的使用和教育(可接受性),认可临床工具的适用性(适当性),并表示课程/培训是可行的(可行性)。讨论/结论:POCUS的使用增加了项目后的实施。未来的研究应评估项目的可持续性,纳入减少放射超声和改善以患者为中心的结果的方法。
{"title":"Impact Evaluation After Implementing a Co-Designed Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Program at a Veterans Affairs Emergency Department","authors":"Rebecca G. Theophanous,&nbsp;Catherine A. Staton,&nbsp;Anna Tupetz,&nbsp;Luna Ragsdale,&nbsp;Erica Peethumnongsin,&nbsp;Alexander Gordee,&nbsp;Maragatha Kuchibhatla,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Eucker","doi":"10.1002/ajum.70024","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajum.70024","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Introduction/Purpose</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an important diagnostic bedside tool, yet a gap remains between Emergency Department (ED) POCUS programme implementation and achieving sustained POCUS use and retention. We performed an impact evaluation of a co-designed POCUS programme implementation intervention and assessed programme acceptability, effectiveness and feasibility.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Our mixed-methods cohort study implemented a co-designed, multifaceted intervention using the consolidated framework for implementation research at a single Veterans Affairs ED (November 2021–October 2022) to enhance POCUS usability and sustainability, including provider education, image review and archival. Primary ED providers (20/25) participated in hands-on POCUS training sessions between February and May 2022. We assessed POCUS program acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility via provider pre/post-course surveys, interviews, and health record data using a validated tool (AIM-IAM-FIM; assessing ED POCUS, radiology ultrasound orders, and ED metrics).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>ED POCUS significantly increased (from 72 to 267 scans, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) 6 months post-intervention, with no significant change in radiology ultrasounds ordered (from 355 to 361, <i>p</i> = 0.417) or ED length-of-stay (from 6.7 to 7.5 h, <i>p</i> = 0.0849). Cardiac, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), soft tissue, musculoskeletal, and biliary ED POCUS were most common; and radiology studies were DVT, biliary and scrotal ultrasound. The pre/post-intervention surveys showed provider comfort with performing and teaching diagnostic and procedural POCUS changed minimally. All respondents approved of POCUS use and education (acceptability), endorsed clinical tool applicability (appropriateness) and stated the course/training was doable (feasibility).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Discussion/Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>POCUS use increased post-program implementation. Future studies should evaluate program sustainability, incorporate methods to reduce radiology ultrasound and improve patient-centered outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145496838","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ipsilateral Phrenic Nerve Paresis Associated With Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block: A Prospective Cohort Study 超声引导下锁骨上阻滞与同侧膈神经麻痹相关:一项前瞻性队列研究
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-05 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.70030
Henry Tsao, Christopher Tang, Adam Cureton, Laura Maskell, Mark Trembath, Philip Jones, Peter J. Snelling

Background

Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block (UGSCB) can provide upper limb regional anaesthesia and is an emerging technique in the emergency department (ED). A potential adverse event is phrenic nerve block causing hemi-diaphragmatic paresis, but its incidence in ED remains unclear.

Methods

This nested prospective cohort study evaluated adult patients (≥ 18 years) without lung disease who underwent UGSCB for closed reduction of distal radius fractures. UGSCB was performed on the injured side using a two-injection method with 20 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was ipsilateral diaphragmatic excursion assessed using bedside ultrasound dynamic imaging before and 30 min post-UGSCB during three respiratory manoeuvres: tidal volume breathing (TV), deep inspiration (DI) and sniff inspiration (SI). Diaphragmatic paralysis was defined as ≥ 75% reduction in diaphragmatic excursion, averaged across the three manoeuvres. Secondary outcomes included vital signs including respiratory rate, oxygen saturations, blood pressure and heart rate.

Results

Sixteen participants were evaluated. UGSCB was associated with reduced ipsilateral diaphragmatic excursion for TV (mean difference [MD] 1.21 cm, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.69–1.75), DI (MD 3.37, 95% CI 2.15 to 4.59) and SI manoeuvres (MD 1.95, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.68). Diaphragmatic paralysis was observed in 10 participants (62.5%). No significant changes in vital signs were observed following UGSCB.

Conclusions

ED physician-performed UGSCB using a two-injection technique was commonly associated with hemi-diaphragmatic paresis, likely due to concomitant phrenic nerve block. However, this was not associated with respiratory or haemodynamic compromise in adult patients without lung disease.

超声引导锁骨上阻滞(UGSCB)可以提供上肢区域麻醉,是急诊科(ED)的一项新兴技术。一个潜在的不良事件是膈神经阻滞引起半膈肌轻瘫,但其在ED中的发病率尚不清楚。方法:本前瞻性队列研究评估无肺部疾病的成人患者(≥18岁)行UGSCB桡骨远端骨折闭合性复位。用0.75%罗哌卡因20 mL两次注射法对损伤侧行UGSCB。主要结果是在三种呼吸操作:潮汐量呼吸(TV)、深吸气(DI)和嗅吸气(SI)期间,在ugscb前和后30分钟使用床边超声动态成像评估同侧膈移位。横膈膜麻痹被定义为横膈膜偏移减少≥75%,这是三种操作的平均值。次要结局包括呼吸频率、血氧饱和度、血压和心率等生命体征。结果对16名参与者进行了评估。UGSCB与TV(平均差值[MD] 1.21 cm, 95%可信区间[95% CI] 0.69-1.75)、DI (MD 3.37, 95% CI 2.15至4.59)和SI操作(MD 1.95, 95% CI 1.23至2.68)减少同侧膈偏移相关。10名参与者(62.5%)出现膈肌麻痹。UGSCB后生命体征无明显变化。结论:内科医生采用双注射技术实施的UGSCB通常与半膈肌轻瘫相关,可能是由于伴随的膈神经阻滞。然而,在没有肺部疾病的成年患者中,这与呼吸或血流动力学损害无关。
{"title":"Ipsilateral Phrenic Nerve Paresis Associated With Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block: A Prospective Cohort Study","authors":"Henry Tsao,&nbsp;Christopher Tang,&nbsp;Adam Cureton,&nbsp;Laura Maskell,&nbsp;Mark Trembath,&nbsp;Philip Jones,&nbsp;Peter J. Snelling","doi":"10.1002/ajum.70030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajum.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block (UGSCB) can provide upper limb regional anaesthesia and is an emerging technique in the emergency department (ED). A potential adverse event is phrenic nerve block causing hemi-diaphragmatic paresis, but its incidence in ED remains unclear.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This nested prospective cohort study evaluated adult patients (≥ 18 years) without lung disease who underwent UGSCB for closed reduction of distal radius fractures. UGSCB was performed on the injured side using a two-injection method with 20 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was ipsilateral diaphragmatic excursion assessed using bedside ultrasound dynamic imaging before and 30 min post-UGSCB during three respiratory manoeuvres: tidal volume breathing (TV), deep inspiration (DI) and sniff inspiration (SI). Diaphragmatic paralysis was defined as ≥ 75% reduction in diaphragmatic excursion, averaged across the three manoeuvres. Secondary outcomes included vital signs including respiratory rate, oxygen saturations, blood pressure and heart rate.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Sixteen participants were evaluated. UGSCB was associated with reduced ipsilateral diaphragmatic excursion for TV (mean difference [MD] 1.21 cm, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.69–1.75), DI (MD 3.37, 95% CI 2.15 to 4.59) and SI manoeuvres (MD 1.95, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.68). Diaphragmatic paralysis was observed in 10 participants (62.5%). No significant changes in vital signs were observed following UGSCB.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>ED physician-performed UGSCB using a two-injection technique was commonly associated with hemi-diaphragmatic paresis, likely due to concomitant phrenic nerve block. However, this was not associated with respiratory or haemodynamic compromise in adult patients without lung disease.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145469498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ultrasound-Guided Arthrocentesis in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review (2013–2023) 超声引导下急诊科关节穿刺:范围综述(2013-2023)
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-29 DOI: 10.1002/ajum.70028
Avijit Barai, Sujatha Kamalaksha, Amy Hogben, Thedchanamoorthy Prashanth, Susie Moreton
<div> <section> <h3> Objective</h3> <p>The objective of this scoping review is to map and describe the current scope of research on ultrasound-guided arthrocentesis (UGA) in the emergency department (ED), assess methodological quality, summarise procedural techniques and identify evidence gaps.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Introduction</h3> <p>Joint aspiration or arthrocentesis procedures are commonly performed in the ED to diagnose and manage painful joints with effusions. The integration of ultrasound technology into arthrocentesis has improved patient care and reduced complications.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Inclusion Criteria</h3> <p>This scoping review examined all articles in the English language published in the ED settings between January 2013 and December 2023. We included human studies in peer-reviewed journals.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Data Sources</h3> <p>PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and OpenGreyEU, searched 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2023 (last run: 18 April 2024). Reference lists hand-searched.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>We applied PRISMA ScR guidelines and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines for this scoping review. A medical librarian constructed a robust and replicable search strategy for contemporary literature in key clinical databases. We registered the protocol in the Open Science Framework (OSF). In addition, we performed a screening of titles, abstracts and full texts through www.rayyan.ai in collaboration with the reviewers. Two reviewers performed screening and data charting independently, with any discordance reviewed by a third investigator.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>During the initial screening, we found 255 articles. After removal of duplicates, we found 182 abstracts for further screening. We identified 30 articles following the abstract screening. We performed a rigorous screening of these 30 full-text articles and included 11 articles for the final review. We found the majority of these articles were case reports (<i>n</i> = 5, 45%) and case series (<i>n</i> = 3, 27%). There was only one randomised controlled trial. Most of the research (<i>n</i> = 8, 73%) was conducted in the USA, which limits the generalisability of the research findings. A significant research gap has been identified, which opens the avenues for future research in this field.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusion</h3>
目的本综述的目的是绘制和描述超声引导关节穿刺(UGA)在急诊科(ED)的当前研究范围,评估方法质量,总结程序技术并确定证据差距。在急诊科,关节抽吸或关节穿刺通常用于诊断和治疗关节积液疼痛。超声技术与关节穿刺的结合改善了患者的护理,减少了并发症。纳入标准本次纳入范围综述检查了2013年1月至2023年12月期间在ED设置中发表的所有英语文章。我们在同行评议的期刊上纳入了人类研究。数据来源PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov和OpenGreyEU,检索2013年1月1日至2023年12月31日(最后一次运行:2024年4月18日)。手工搜索参考列表。方法应用PRISMA ScR指南和Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)指南进行范围综述。一位医学图书管理员在关键临床数据库中构建了一个健壮的、可复制的当代文献检索策略。我们在开放科学框架(OSF)中注册了该协议。此外,我们与审稿人合作,通过www.rayyan.ai对标题、摘要和全文进行了筛选。两名审查员独立进行筛选和数据制图,任何不一致由第三名审查员审查。结果在最初的筛选中,我们发现了255篇文章。去除重复后,我们找到182篇摘要进行进一步筛选。摘要筛选后,我们确定了30篇文章。我们对这30篇全文文章进行了严格的筛选,并纳入了11篇文章进行最终评审。我们发现这些文章中的大多数是病例报告(n = 5, 45%)和病例系列(n = 3, 27%)。只有一项随机对照试验。大多数研究(n = 8,73 %)是在美国进行的,这限制了研究结果的普遍性。发现了一个重要的研究空白,这为该领域的未来研究开辟了道路。结论:本综述强调,虽然UGA在ED中的应用越来越多,但现有的同期证据有限且不一致。在范围审查中存在重大的研究缺口,需要更大规模、更高质量的研究来建立标准化的实践和评估临床结果。
{"title":"Ultrasound-Guided Arthrocentesis in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review (2013–2023)","authors":"Avijit Barai,&nbsp;Sujatha Kamalaksha,&nbsp;Amy Hogben,&nbsp;Thedchanamoorthy Prashanth,&nbsp;Susie Moreton","doi":"10.1002/ajum.70028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajum.70028","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objective&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The objective of this scoping review is to map and describe the current scope of research on ultrasound-guided arthrocentesis (UGA) in the emergency department (ED), assess methodological quality, summarise procedural techniques and identify evidence gaps.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Introduction&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Joint aspiration or arthrocentesis procedures are commonly performed in the ED to diagnose and manage painful joints with effusions. The integration of ultrasound technology into arthrocentesis has improved patient care and reduced complications.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Inclusion Criteria&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This scoping review examined all articles in the English language published in the ED settings between January 2013 and December 2023. We included human studies in peer-reviewed journals.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Data Sources&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and OpenGreyEU, searched 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2023 (last run: 18 April 2024). Reference lists hand-searched.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;We applied PRISMA ScR guidelines and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines for this scoping review. A medical librarian constructed a robust and replicable search strategy for contemporary literature in key clinical databases. We registered the protocol in the Open Science Framework (OSF). In addition, we performed a screening of titles, abstracts and full texts through www.rayyan.ai in collaboration with the reviewers. Two reviewers performed screening and data charting independently, with any discordance reviewed by a third investigator.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;During the initial screening, we found 255 articles. After removal of duplicates, we found 182 abstracts for further screening. We identified 30 articles following the abstract screening. We performed a rigorous screening of these 30 full-text articles and included 11 articles for the final review. We found the majority of these articles were case reports (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 5, 45%) and case series (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 3, 27%). There was only one randomised controlled trial. Most of the research (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 8, 73%) was conducted in the USA, which limits the generalisability of the research findings. A significant research gap has been identified, which opens the avenues for future research in this field.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 ","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145407087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1