Early Prediction for Graduation of Private High School Students with Machine Learning Approach

None Kartini, None Fetty Tri Anggraeny, None Aang Kisnu Darmawan, None Anik Anekawati, None Ivana Yudhisari
{"title":"Early Prediction for Graduation of Private High School Students with Machine Learning Approach","authors":"None Kartini, None Fetty Tri Anggraeny, None Aang Kisnu Darmawan, None Anik Anekawati, None Ivana Yudhisari","doi":"10.47577/technium.v16i.9971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Graduation rates indicate school success. Predicting student graduation helps schools identify students in danger of dropping out and intervene early to enhance academic performance. It can also assist policymakers create graduation and dropout prevention initiatives. However, based on a literature search, predicting student graduation rates from admission test scores is difficult. School grades are a better predictor of timely tertiary graduation than acceptance test scores because college success requires cognitive abilities and self-regulation competencies, which are better indexed by school grades. Self-efficacy, school academic culture, and future expectations can also affect student graduation rates. Finally, the selective admissions modality needs to be refined. This study aims to (1) predict private high school graduation with eight algorithms: Random tree, Naïve Bayes Multinomial, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbor, Ada Boost, Multilayer perceptron, Logistic regression, and (2) compare the performance of the eight algorithms. According to research, the Random tree, Naïve Bayes Multinomial, Random forest (RF), and Ada boost algorithms all perform at 99.49% for the first aim. For the second objective, the Random Tree approach outperforms other algorithms in Accuracy (99.49%), Precision (100%), F-Measure (99.74%), and consumption time (0 seconds). Therefore, the Random tree algorithm outperforms others. This research contributes in two ways: scientifically by testing eight algorithms—Random tree, Naïve Bayes Multinomial, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbor, Ada Boost, Multilayer perceptron, and Logistic regression—to predict private high school graduation, and secondly by recommending school administrators to develop a selective enrollment model.","PeriodicalId":490649,"journal":{"name":"Technium","volume":"69 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v16i.9971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Graduation rates indicate school success. Predicting student graduation helps schools identify students in danger of dropping out and intervene early to enhance academic performance. It can also assist policymakers create graduation and dropout prevention initiatives. However, based on a literature search, predicting student graduation rates from admission test scores is difficult. School grades are a better predictor of timely tertiary graduation than acceptance test scores because college success requires cognitive abilities and self-regulation competencies, which are better indexed by school grades. Self-efficacy, school academic culture, and future expectations can also affect student graduation rates. Finally, the selective admissions modality needs to be refined. This study aims to (1) predict private high school graduation with eight algorithms: Random tree, Naïve Bayes Multinomial, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbor, Ada Boost, Multilayer perceptron, Logistic regression, and (2) compare the performance of the eight algorithms. According to research, the Random tree, Naïve Bayes Multinomial, Random forest (RF), and Ada boost algorithms all perform at 99.49% for the first aim. For the second objective, the Random Tree approach outperforms other algorithms in Accuracy (99.49%), Precision (100%), F-Measure (99.74%), and consumption time (0 seconds). Therefore, the Random tree algorithm outperforms others. This research contributes in two ways: scientifically by testing eight algorithms—Random tree, Naïve Bayes Multinomial, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbor, Ada Boost, Multilayer perceptron, and Logistic regression—to predict private high school graduation, and secondly by recommending school administrators to develop a selective enrollment model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习方法的私立高中学生毕业早期预测
毕业率表明学校的成绩。预测学生毕业可以帮助学校识别有辍学危险的学生,并及早干预以提高学习成绩。它还可以帮助政策制定者制定预防毕业和辍学的举措。然而,根据文献检索,从入学考试成绩预测学生的毕业率是困难的。学校成绩比入学考试成绩更能预测学生是否能及时毕业,因为大学成功需要认知能力和自我调节能力,而这些都可以通过学校成绩更好地反映出来。自我效能感、学校学术文化和对未来的期望也会影响学生的毕业率。最后,选择性录取模式需要改进。本研究旨在(1)使用随机树、Naïve贝叶斯多项式、支持向量机(SVM)、随机森林(RF)、k近邻、Ada Boost、多层感知器、逻辑回归等八种算法预测私立高中毕业率,(2)比较八种算法的性能。根据研究,随机树、Naïve贝叶斯多项式、随机森林(RF)和Ada增强算法在第一个目标上的表现都是99.49%。对于第二个目标,随机树方法在准确性(99.49%),精度(100%),F-Measure(99.74%)和消耗时间(0秒)方面优于其他算法。因此,随机树算法优于其他算法。本研究在两个方面作出贡献:科学地通过测试八种算法-随机树,Naïve贝叶斯多项式,支持向量机(SVM),随机森林(RF), k近邻,Ada Boost,多层感知器和Logistic回归-来预测私立高中毕业,其次建议学校管理者开发选择性入学模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Internal Boiler Water Treatment Maintenance System on Boiler Operation in KM. Bukit Raya Electric Parameter Measurement on Main Generator Based on IoT for Safe Operational Feasibility Design of half circular wideband antenna for ship radar The Proof of the Collatz Conjecture Sentiment Analysis for Indonesian Salt Policy uses Naïve Bayes and Information Gain Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1