The landscape of data and AI documentation approaches in the European policy context

IF 3.4 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Ethics and Information Technology Pub Date : 2023-10-28 DOI:10.1007/s10676-023-09725-7
Marina Micheli, Isabelle Hupont, Blagoj Delipetrev, Josep Soler-Garrido
{"title":"The landscape of data and AI documentation approaches in the European policy context","authors":"Marina Micheli, Isabelle Hupont, Blagoj Delipetrev, Josep Soler-Garrido","doi":"10.1007/s10676-023-09725-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Nowadays, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is present in all sectors of the economy. Consequently, both data-the raw material used to build AI systems- and AI have an unprecedented impact on society and there is a need to ensure that they work for its benefit. For this reason, the European Union has put data and trustworthy AI at the center of recent legislative initiatives. An important element in these regulations is transparency, understood as the provision of information to relevant stakeholders to support their understanding of AI systems and data throughout their lifecycle. In recent years, an increasing number of approaches for documenting AI and datasets have emerged, both within academia and the private sector. In this work, we identify the 36 most relevant ones from more than 2200 papers related to trustworthy AI. We assess their relevance from the angle of European regulatory objectives, their coverage of AI technologies and economic sectors, and their suitability to address the specific needs of multiple stakeholders. Finally, we discuss the main documentation gaps found, including the need to better address data innovation practices (e.g. data sharing, data reuse) and large-scale algorithmic systems (e.g. those used in online platforms), and to widen the focus from algorithms and data to AI systems as a whole.","PeriodicalId":51495,"journal":{"name":"Ethics and Information Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics and Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-023-09725-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Nowadays, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is present in all sectors of the economy. Consequently, both data-the raw material used to build AI systems- and AI have an unprecedented impact on society and there is a need to ensure that they work for its benefit. For this reason, the European Union has put data and trustworthy AI at the center of recent legislative initiatives. An important element in these regulations is transparency, understood as the provision of information to relevant stakeholders to support their understanding of AI systems and data throughout their lifecycle. In recent years, an increasing number of approaches for documenting AI and datasets have emerged, both within academia and the private sector. In this work, we identify the 36 most relevant ones from more than 2200 papers related to trustworthy AI. We assess their relevance from the angle of European regulatory objectives, their coverage of AI technologies and economic sectors, and their suitability to address the specific needs of multiple stakeholders. Finally, we discuss the main documentation gaps found, including the need to better address data innovation practices (e.g. data sharing, data reuse) and large-scale algorithmic systems (e.g. those used in online platforms), and to widen the focus from algorithms and data to AI systems as a whole.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲政策背景下的数据和人工智能文档方法的景观
如今,人工智能(AI)存在于经济的各个领域。因此,数据(用于构建人工智能系统的原材料)和人工智能都对社会产生了前所未有的影响,因此有必要确保它们为人工智能的利益而工作。出于这个原因,欧盟将数据和可信赖的人工智能作为最近立法举措的核心。这些法规的一个重要因素是透明度,被理解为向相关利益相关者提供信息,以支持他们在整个生命周期中理解人工智能系统和数据。近年来,学术界和私营部门出现了越来越多的记录人工智能和数据集的方法。在这项工作中,我们从2200多篇与可信赖的人工智能相关的论文中确定了36篇最相关的论文。我们从欧洲监管目标的角度评估它们的相关性,它们对人工智能技术和经济部门的覆盖范围,以及它们满足多个利益相关者特定需求的适用性。最后,我们讨论了发现的主要文档差距,包括需要更好地解决数据创新实践(例如数据共享,数据重用)和大规模算法系统(例如在线平台中使用的系统),并将焦点从算法和数据扩大到整个人工智能系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Ethics and Information Technology is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to advancing the dialogue between moral philosophy and the field of information and communication technology (ICT). The journal aims to foster and promote reflection and analysis which is intended to make a constructive contribution to answering the ethical, social and political questions associated with the adoption, use, and development of ICT. Within the scope of the journal are also conceptual analysis and discussion of ethical ICT issues which arise in the context of technology assessment, cultural studies, public policy analysis and public administration, cognitive science, social and anthropological studies in technology, mass-communication, and legal studies.
期刊最新文献
Conceptualizing understanding in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): an abilities-based approach Deconstructing controversies to design a trustworthy AI future Transparency for AI systems: a value-based approach Undisruptable or stable concepts: can we design concepts that can avoid conceptual disruption, normative critique, and counterexamples? Ludic resistance: a new solution to the gamer’s paradox
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1