Large Eddy Simulation of a Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade with Turbulent End Wall Boundary Layers

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS Flow, Turbulence and Combustion Pub Date : 2023-10-28 DOI:10.1007/s10494-023-00502-6
Christian Morsbach, Michael Bergmann, Adem Tosun, Bjoern F. Klose, Edmund Kügeler, Matthias Franke
{"title":"Large Eddy Simulation of a Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade with Turbulent End Wall Boundary Layers","authors":"Christian Morsbach, Michael Bergmann, Adem Tosun, Bjoern F. Klose, Edmund Kügeler, Matthias Franke","doi":"10.1007/s10494-023-00502-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We present results of implicit large eddy simulation (LES) and different Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models of the MTU 161 low pressure turbine at an exit Reynolds number of $$90\\,000$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>90</mml:mn> <mml:mspace /> <mml:mn>000</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and exit Mach number of 0.6. The LES results are based on a high-order discontinuous Galerkin method and the RANS is computed using a classical finite-volume approach. The paper discusses the steps taken to create realistic inflow boundary conditions in terms of end wall boundary layer thickness and freestream turbulence intensity. This is achieved by tailoring the input distribution of total pressure and temperature, Reynolds stresses and turbulence length scale to a Fourier series based synthetic turbulence generator. With this procedure, excellent agreement with the experiment can be achieved in terms of blade loading at midspan and wake total pressure losses at midspan and over the channel height. Based on the validated setup, we focus on the discussion of secondary flow structures emerging due to the interaction of the incoming boundary layer and the turbine blade and compare the LES to two commonly used RANS models. Since we are able to create consistent setups for both LES and RANS, all discrepancies can be directly attributed to physical modelling problems. We show that both a linear eddy viscosity model and a differential Reynolds stress model coupled with a state-of-the-art correlation-based transition model fail, in this case, to predict the separation induced transition process around midspan. Moreover, their prediction of secondary flow losses leaves room for improvement as shown by a detailed discussion of turbulence kinetic energy and anisotropy fields.","PeriodicalId":559,"journal":{"name":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-023-00502-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract We present results of implicit large eddy simulation (LES) and different Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models of the MTU 161 low pressure turbine at an exit Reynolds number of $$90\,000$$ 90 000 and exit Mach number of 0.6. The LES results are based on a high-order discontinuous Galerkin method and the RANS is computed using a classical finite-volume approach. The paper discusses the steps taken to create realistic inflow boundary conditions in terms of end wall boundary layer thickness and freestream turbulence intensity. This is achieved by tailoring the input distribution of total pressure and temperature, Reynolds stresses and turbulence length scale to a Fourier series based synthetic turbulence generator. With this procedure, excellent agreement with the experiment can be achieved in terms of blade loading at midspan and wake total pressure losses at midspan and over the channel height. Based on the validated setup, we focus on the discussion of secondary flow structures emerging due to the interaction of the incoming boundary layer and the turbine blade and compare the LES to two commonly used RANS models. Since we are able to create consistent setups for both LES and RANS, all discrepancies can be directly attributed to physical modelling problems. We show that both a linear eddy viscosity model and a differential Reynolds stress model coupled with a state-of-the-art correlation-based transition model fail, in this case, to predict the separation induced transition process around midspan. Moreover, their prediction of secondary flow losses leaves room for improvement as shown by a detailed discussion of turbulence kinetic energy and anisotropy fields.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有湍流端壁边界层的低压涡轮叶栅大涡模拟
摘要对出口雷诺数为$$90\,000$$ 9 000、出口马赫数为0.6的MTU 161低压涡轮进行了隐式大涡模拟(LES)和不同的雷诺平均纳维-斯托克斯(RANS)模型。LES的计算结果基于高阶不连续伽辽金方法,而RANS的计算则采用经典的有限体积方法。本文从端壁边界层厚度和自由流湍流强度两方面讨论了建立真实入流边界条件的步骤。这是通过将总压力和温度、雷诺应力和湍流长度尺度的输入分布裁剪到基于傅立叶级数的合成湍流发生器来实现的。采用该方法,叶片跨中负荷、跨中及通道高度尾迹总压损失与实验结果非常吻合。基于验证的设置,我们重点讨论了由于来流边界层和涡轮叶片相互作用而产生的二次流结构,并将LES与两种常用的RANS模型进行了比较。由于我们能够为LES和RANS创建一致的设置,因此所有差异都可以直接归因于物理建模问题。我们发现,在这种情况下,线性涡流黏度模型和微分雷诺应力模型以及最先进的基于相关性的过渡模型都无法预测跨中附近的分离诱导过渡过程。此外,他们对二次流损失的预测还有改进的余地,这可以从湍流动能和各向异性场的详细讨论中看出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Flow, Turbulence and Combustion provides a global forum for the publication of original and innovative research results that contribute to the solution of fundamental and applied problems encountered in single-phase, multi-phase and reacting flows, in both idealized and real systems. The scope of coverage encompasses topics in fluid dynamics, scalar transport, multi-physics interactions and flow control. From time to time the journal publishes Special or Theme Issues featuring invited articles. Contributions may report research that falls within the broad spectrum of analytical, computational and experimental methods. This includes research conducted in academia, industry and a variety of environmental and geophysical sectors. Turbulence, transition and associated phenomena are expected to play a significant role in the majority of studies reported, although non-turbulent flows, typical of those in micro-devices, would be regarded as falling within the scope covered. The emphasis is on originality, timeliness, quality and thematic fit, as exemplified by the title of the journal and the qualifications described above. Relevance to real-world problems and industrial applications are regarded as strengths.
期刊最新文献
Spatial Averaging Effects in Adverse Pressure Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layers LES of Biomass Syngas Combustion in a Swirl Stabilised Burner: Model Validation and Predictions A Comparison of Evaluation Methodologies of the Fractal Dimension of Premixed Turbulent Flames in 2D and 3D Using Direct Numerical Simulation Data Instability Modes and Scaling Analysis During Electro-Hydro-Dynamic-Atomization: Theoretical and Experimental Study Assessment of Wall Modeling With Adverse Pressure Gradient for High Reynolds Number Separated Flows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1