The importance of digital evidence strategies

IF 2.1 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY WIREs. Forensic science Pub Date : 2023-10-28 DOI:10.1002/wfs2.1507
Graeme Horsman
{"title":"The importance of digital evidence strategies","authors":"Graeme Horsman","doi":"10.1002/wfs2.1507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As the complexity of digital forensic work continues to grow, and the demands and pressures placed on practitioners to complete their investigatory commitments remain, methods for conducting effective and efficient work are of paramount importance. To combat examination challenges any investigating team requires two fundamental and linked components; those conducting DF examinations should develop (1) a digital evidence strategy (DES) that outlines an effective investigative approach, and, (2) deploy it using appropriate tools and techniques. While these should be considered as a pair, arguably as tools have become more comprehensive and more akin to “ suites ,” there is a real risk that tools themselves are being considered an “ examination strategy ,” bypassing the need for investigative forethought. Given this concern, through the vehicle of an example deconstructed hypothetical forensic examination process, this work discusses the relationship between DESs and digital forensic tools, and the importance of both. This article is categorized under: Digital and Multimedia Science > Cybercrime Investigation","PeriodicalId":75325,"journal":{"name":"WIREs. Forensic science","volume":"40 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs. Forensic science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract As the complexity of digital forensic work continues to grow, and the demands and pressures placed on practitioners to complete their investigatory commitments remain, methods for conducting effective and efficient work are of paramount importance. To combat examination challenges any investigating team requires two fundamental and linked components; those conducting DF examinations should develop (1) a digital evidence strategy (DES) that outlines an effective investigative approach, and, (2) deploy it using appropriate tools and techniques. While these should be considered as a pair, arguably as tools have become more comprehensive and more akin to “ suites ,” there is a real risk that tools themselves are being considered an “ examination strategy ,” bypassing the need for investigative forethought. Given this concern, through the vehicle of an example deconstructed hypothetical forensic examination process, this work discusses the relationship between DESs and digital forensic tools, and the importance of both. This article is categorized under: Digital and Multimedia Science > Cybercrime Investigation
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字证据策略的重要性
随着数字法医工作的复杂性不断增长,从业者完成调查承诺的需求和压力仍然存在,进行有效和高效工作的方法至关重要。为了应对考试挑战,任何调查小组都需要两个基本的和相互联系的组成部分;进行DF检查的机构应制定(1)数字证据策略(DES),概述有效的调查方法,以及(2)使用适当的工具和技术进行部署。虽然这些工具应该被视为一对,但随着工具变得更加全面,更类似于“套件”,工具本身被认为是一种“检查策略”,从而绕过了对调查预先考虑的需要,这是一个真正的风险。考虑到这一问题,通过一个解构的假设法医检查过程的例子,本工作讨论了DESs和数字法医工具之间的关系,以及两者的重要性。本文分类如下:数字与多媒体科学;网络犯罪的调查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The prevalence, risks, and detection of driving under the influence of nitrous oxide Chlorate‐based homemade explosives: A review The importance of digital evidence strategies The metaverse—Not a new frontier for crime “Noble cause casuistry” in forensic genetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1