Against Kerygma: Blumenberg's Critique of Rudolf Bultmann's Theology

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES German Studies Review Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1353/gsr.2023.a910189
Peter Uwe Hohendahl
{"title":"Against Kerygma: Blumenberg's Critique of Rudolf Bultmann's Theology","authors":"Peter Uwe Hohendahl","doi":"10.1353/gsr.2023.a910189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract: In St. Matthew Passion (1988) Hans Blumenberg singles out the theologian Rudolf Bultmann for harsh criticism. The polemic focusses on his reading of the passion narrative in the Gospel of Matthew. After presenting Bultmann's theological position, the present essay examines the evolution of Blumenberg's critique of Bultmann's theology. While the early criticism focuses on theological issues, in The Legitimacy of the Modern Age (1966) Blumenberg stresses the philosophical-historical aspect, while Work on Myth (1979) foregrounds the question of myth. In St. Matthew Passion theological problems move to the center again, turning Bultmann into the prime example of harmful theology.","PeriodicalId":43954,"journal":{"name":"German Studies Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2023.a910189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract: In St. Matthew Passion (1988) Hans Blumenberg singles out the theologian Rudolf Bultmann for harsh criticism. The polemic focusses on his reading of the passion narrative in the Gospel of Matthew. After presenting Bultmann's theological position, the present essay examines the evolution of Blumenberg's critique of Bultmann's theology. While the early criticism focuses on theological issues, in The Legitimacy of the Modern Age (1966) Blumenberg stresses the philosophical-historical aspect, while Work on Myth (1979) foregrounds the question of myth. In St. Matthew Passion theological problems move to the center again, turning Bultmann into the prime example of harmful theology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反对克里格玛:布鲁门伯格对鲁道夫·布特曼神学的批判
在《马太受难记》(1988)一书中,汉斯·布鲁门伯格对神学家鲁道夫·布尔特曼进行了严厉的批评。辩论集中在他对马太福音中受难叙述的解读上。在介绍了布尔特曼的神学立场之后,本文考察了布卢门伯格对布尔特曼神学批判的演变。早期的批评集中在神学问题上,在《现代的合法性》(1966)中,布鲁门伯格强调哲学-历史方面,而《论神话》(1979)则强调神话问题。在《马太受难书》中,神学问题又回到了中心,把布尔特曼变成了有害神学的主要例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
期刊最新文献
Cultural Narratives of Charles V and Spanish Imaginaries in West Germany during the Franco Dictatorship Energy and Power: Germany in the Age of Oil, Atoms, and Climate Change by Stephen G. Gross (review) Günter Grass und die Berliner Republik. Eine biografische Fallstudie über die kommunikative Macht von Intellektuellen by Friederike Stausberg (review) Writing at a Distance: Notes on Authorship and Artificial Intelligence Ethiken der Essenz. Eine Emotions- und Körpergeschichte der Rasse in inneren Kolonien (1890–1933) by Anna Danilina (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1