The impact of IFRS 9 on the cyclicality of loan loss provisions

IF 0.9 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance Pub Date : 2023-10-28 DOI:10.1002/jcaf.22669
Smilla Hansen, Michel Charifzadeh, Tim A. Herberger
{"title":"The impact of IFRS 9 on the cyclicality of loan loss provisions","authors":"Smilla Hansen,&nbsp;Michel Charifzadeh,&nbsp;Tim A. Herberger","doi":"10.1002/jcaf.22669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Through their procyclical behavior, loan loss provisions have been determined as one of the factors that contribute to financial instability during a crisis. IFRS 9 was introduced in 2018 with an expected credit loss model replacing the incurred loss model of IAS 39 to mitigate the effect in the future. Our study aims to analyze loan loss provisions of major banks in the Eurozone to determine for the first time if the implementation of IFRS 9, as intended by regulators, has a dampening effect on procyclicality, especially during the stressed situation under COVID-19. We analyze 51 banks from 12 countries of the European Monetary Union using 2856 firm-year observations. While no robust evidence of less procyclicality can be found after the implementation of IFRS 9 until the pandemic, we find evidence that loan loss provisions moved countercyclical during 2020, indicating an alleviating effect at the beginning of the exogenous shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":44561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcaf.22669","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcaf.22669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Through their procyclical behavior, loan loss provisions have been determined as one of the factors that contribute to financial instability during a crisis. IFRS 9 was introduced in 2018 with an expected credit loss model replacing the incurred loss model of IAS 39 to mitigate the effect in the future. Our study aims to analyze loan loss provisions of major banks in the Eurozone to determine for the first time if the implementation of IFRS 9, as intended by regulators, has a dampening effect on procyclicality, especially during the stressed situation under COVID-19. We analyze 51 banks from 12 countries of the European Monetary Union using 2856 firm-year observations. While no robust evidence of less procyclicality can be found after the implementation of IFRS 9 until the pandemic, we find evidence that loan loss provisions moved countercyclical during 2020, indicating an alleviating effect at the beginning of the exogenous shock.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际财务报告准则第 9 号》对贷款损失准备金周期性的影响
通过其顺周期行为,贷款损失准备金已被确定为危机期间导致金融不稳定的因素之一。2018 年引入的《国际财务报告准则》第 9 号以预期信用损失模型取代了《国际会计准则》第 39 号的已发生损失模型,以减轻未来的影响。我们的研究旨在分析欧元区主要银行的贷款损失准备金,以首次确定监管机构意图实施的《国际财务报告准则第 9 号》是否对顺周期性产生了抑制作用,尤其是在 COVID-19 的压力情况下。我们利用 2856 个公司年观测数据分析了来自欧洲货币联盟 12 个国家的 51 家银行。虽然在《国际财务报告准则第 9 号》实施后直到大流行病发生前,都没有发现顺周期性降低的有力证据,但我们发现有证据表明,贷款损失准备金在 2020 年期间出现了反周期性变化,这表明在外源冲击开始时产生了缓解效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Do CEO gender and narcissism jointly affect CEO letter readability? An accountant in the C-suite: Chief Accounting Officers and asymmetric timely loss recognition Earnings quality of multinational corporations: Evidence from Latin America before and after IFRS implementation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1