Heuristic-driven biases as mental shortcuts in investment management activities: a qualitative study

IF 1.9 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Qualitative Research in financial Markets Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1108/qrfm-10-2022-0167
Maqsood Ahmad, Qiang Wu
{"title":"Heuristic-driven biases as mental shortcuts in investment management activities: a qualitative study","authors":"Maqsood Ahmad, Qiang Wu","doi":"10.1108/qrfm-10-2022-0167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to use a qualitative approach to explore and clarify the mechanism by which heuristic-driven biases influence the decisions and performance of individual investors actively trading on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). It also aims to identify how to overcome the negative effect of heuristic-driven biases, so that finance practitioners can avoid the expensive errors which they cause. Design/methodology/approach This study adopts an interpretative approach. Qualitative data was collected in semistructured interviews, in which the target population was asked open-ended questions. The sample consists of five brokers and/or investment strategists/advisors who maintain investors’ accounts or provide investment advice to investors on the PSX, who were selected on a convenient basis. The researchers analyzed the interview data thematically. Findings The results confirm that investors often use heuristics, causing several heuristic-driven biases when trading on the stock market, specifically, reliance on recognition-based heuristics, namely, alphabetical ordering of firm names, name memorability and name fluency, as well as cognitive heuristics, such as herding behavior, disposition effect, anchoring and adjustment, repetitiveness, overconfidence and availability biases. These lead investors to make suboptimal decisions relating to their investment management activities. Due to these heuristic-driven biases, investors trade excessively in the stock market, and their investment performance is adversely affected. Originality/value This study provides a practical framework to explore and clarify the mechanism by which heuristic-driven biases influence investment management activities. To the best of authors’ knowledge, the current study is the first to focus on links between heuristic-driven biases, investment decisions and performance using a qualitative approach. Furthermore, with the help of a qualitative approach, the investigators also highlight some factors causing an increased use of heuristic variables by investors and discuss practical approaches to overcoming the negative effects of heuristics factors, so that finance practitioners can avoid repeating the expensive errors which they cause, which also differentiates this study from others.","PeriodicalId":45060,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in financial Markets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in financial Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qrfm-10-2022-0167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to use a qualitative approach to explore and clarify the mechanism by which heuristic-driven biases influence the decisions and performance of individual investors actively trading on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). It also aims to identify how to overcome the negative effect of heuristic-driven biases, so that finance practitioners can avoid the expensive errors which they cause. Design/methodology/approach This study adopts an interpretative approach. Qualitative data was collected in semistructured interviews, in which the target population was asked open-ended questions. The sample consists of five brokers and/or investment strategists/advisors who maintain investors’ accounts or provide investment advice to investors on the PSX, who were selected on a convenient basis. The researchers analyzed the interview data thematically. Findings The results confirm that investors often use heuristics, causing several heuristic-driven biases when trading on the stock market, specifically, reliance on recognition-based heuristics, namely, alphabetical ordering of firm names, name memorability and name fluency, as well as cognitive heuristics, such as herding behavior, disposition effect, anchoring and adjustment, repetitiveness, overconfidence and availability biases. These lead investors to make suboptimal decisions relating to their investment management activities. Due to these heuristic-driven biases, investors trade excessively in the stock market, and their investment performance is adversely affected. Originality/value This study provides a practical framework to explore and clarify the mechanism by which heuristic-driven biases influence investment management activities. To the best of authors’ knowledge, the current study is the first to focus on links between heuristic-driven biases, investment decisions and performance using a qualitative approach. Furthermore, with the help of a qualitative approach, the investigators also highlight some factors causing an increased use of heuristic variables by investors and discuss practical approaches to overcoming the negative effects of heuristics factors, so that finance practitioners can avoid repeating the expensive errors which they cause, which also differentiates this study from others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
启发式偏见作为投资管理活动中的心理捷径:一项定性研究
本研究旨在使用定性方法探索和阐明启发式偏见影响在巴基斯坦证券交易所(PSX)积极交易的个人投资者决策和绩效的机制。它还旨在确定如何克服启发式驱动偏差的负面影响,以便金融从业者可以避免它们造成的昂贵错误。设计/方法/方法本研究采用解释性方法。定性数据是在半结构化访谈中收集的,在访谈中,目标人群被问及开放式问题。样本由五名经纪人和/或投资策略师/顾问组成,他们负责维护投资者的账户或向PSX的投资者提供投资建议,他们是在方便的基础上选择的。研究人员对访谈数据进行了主题分析。研究结果证实,投资者在股票交易中经常使用启发式方法,导致了启发式驱动的偏差,特别是对基于识别的启发式方法的依赖,即公司名称的字母顺序、名称记忆性和名称流畅性,以及认知启发式方法,如羊群行为、倾向效应、锚定和调整、重复、过度自信和可得性偏差。这些因素导致投资者在投资管理活动中做出次优决策。由于这些启发式驱动的偏差,投资者在股票市场中过度交易,并对其投资绩效产生不利影响。原创性/价值本研究提供了一个实用的框架来探索和澄清启发式驱动的偏见影响投资管理活动的机制。据作者所知,目前的研究是第一个使用定性方法关注启发式偏见、投资决策和业绩之间联系的研究。此外,在定性方法的帮助下,研究人员还强调了导致投资者增加使用启发式变量的一些因素,并讨论了克服启发式因素负面影响的实用方法,以便金融从业者可以避免重复他们造成的昂贵错误,这也是本研究与其他研究的不同之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Qualitative Research in Financial Markets is the only peer-reviewed journal dedicated to exploring the rapidly-growing area of research activity in finance that uses qualitative methods. Building on a long pedigree of finance research, the journal publishes international and innovative analyses and novel insights into financial markets worldwide
期刊最新文献
Internal Shariah audit change: an identification of specific Islamic legal maxim in Islamic banking institution Role of policyholders’ beliefs in life insurance lapses: a model building approach Exploring the potential impact of big data on the collection of sufficient, appropriate audit evidence: insights from auditors in the UAE Determinants inhibiting digital payment system adoption: an Indian perspective Debt advice in Europe: a search of the good practices to fight over-indebtedness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1