Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians; Chemehuevi Indian Tribe; Blue Lake Rancheria; Hopland Band of Pomo Indians; Robinson Rancheria, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.State of California; Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, Defendants-Appellants.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.No. 21-15751Opinion, Concurrence, and DissentArgued and Submitted December 9, 2021 — San Francisco, California.Filed July 28, 2022.

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1089/glr2.2022.29070.cas

{"title":"Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians; Chemehuevi Indian Tribe; Blue Lake Rancheria; Hopland Band of Pomo Indians; Robinson Rancheria, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.State of California; Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, Defendants-Appellants.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.No. 21-15751Opinion, Concurrence, and DissentArgued and Submitted December 9, 2021 — San Francisco, California.Filed July 28, 2022.","authors":"","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2022.29070.cas","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gaming Law ReviewVol. 27, No. 2 CaseChicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians; Chemehuevi Indian Tribe; Blue Lake Rancheria; Hopland Band of Pomo Indians; Robinson Rancheria, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.State of California; Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, Defendants-Appellants.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.No. 21-15751Opinion, Concurrence, and DissentArgued and Submitted December 9, 2021 — San Francisco, California.Filed July 28, 2022.Published Online:7 Mar 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2022.29070.casAboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View articleFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 27Issue 2Mar 2023 InformationCopyright 2023, 2023 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians; Chemehuevi Indian Tribe; Blue Lake Rancheria; Hopland Band of Pomo Indians; Robinson Rancheria, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.State of California; Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, Defendants-Appellants.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.No. 21-15751Opinion, Concurrence, and DissentArgued and Submitted December 9, 2021 — San Francisco, California.Filed July 28, 2022..Gaming Law Review.Mar 2023.75-103.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2022.29070.casPublished in Volume: 27 Issue 2: March 7, 2023Online Ahead of Print:February 3, 2023PDF download","PeriodicalId":44210,"journal":{"name":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","volume":"185 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2022.29070.cas","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gaming Law ReviewVol. 27, No. 2 CaseChicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians; Chemehuevi Indian Tribe; Blue Lake Rancheria; Hopland Band of Pomo Indians; Robinson Rancheria, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.State of California; Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, Defendants-Appellants.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.No. 21-15751Opinion, Concurrence, and DissentArgued and Submitted December 9, 2021 — San Francisco, California.Filed July 28, 2022.Published Online:7 Mar 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2022.29070.casAboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View articleFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 27Issue 2Mar 2023 InformationCopyright 2023, 2023 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians; Chemehuevi Indian Tribe; Blue Lake Rancheria; Hopland Band of Pomo Indians; Robinson Rancheria, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.State of California; Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, Defendants-Appellants.United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.No. 21-15751Opinion, Concurrence, and DissentArgued and Submitted December 9, 2021 — San Francisco, California.Filed July 28, 2022..Gaming Law Review.Mar 2023.75-103.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2022.29070.casPublished in Volume: 27 Issue 2: March 7, 2023Online Ahead of Print:February 3, 2023PDF download

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Me-Wuk印第安人的养鸡场;切梅韦维印第安人部落;蓝湖牧场;波莫印第安人的霍普兰部落;罗宾逊·兰彻里亚，原告-上诉人诉。加利福尼亚州;加文·纽森，加州州长，被告-上诉人。美国联邦上诉法院第九巡回法院。21-15751意见、赞同和异议辩论并提交2021年12月9日-加州旧金山。提交于2022年7月28日。

博彩法律评论卷。27、No. 2 casechchicken Ranch of Me-Wuk Indians;切梅韦维印第安人部落;蓝湖牧场;波莫印第安人的霍普兰部落;罗宾逊·兰彻里亚，原告-上诉人诉。加利福尼亚州;加文·纽森，加州州长，被告-上诉人。美国联邦上诉法院第九巡回法院。21-15751意见、赞同和异议辩论并提交2021年12月9日-加州旧金山。提交于2022年7月28日。出版在线:2023年3月7日https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2022.29070.casAboutSectionsView文章查看全文pdf /EPUB权限和CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack citations添加到收藏夹回到出版物共享在facebook上分享推特链接在redditemail查看文章figuresreferencesrelateddetails卷27Issue 2march 2023信息版权2023,2023玛丽安Liebert, Inc.，出版商引用这篇文章:Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians;切梅韦维印第安人部落;蓝湖牧场;波莫印第安人的霍普兰部落;罗宾逊·兰彻里亚，原告-上诉人诉。加利福尼亚州;加文·纽森，加州州长，被告-上诉人。美国联邦上诉法院第九巡回法院。21-15751意见、赞同和异议辩论并提交2021年12月9日-加州旧金山。申请于2022年7月28日…博彩法律评论。2023.75-103.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2022.29070.casPublished卷:27期:2023年3月7日在线提前打印:2023年2月3日pdf下载

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy LAW-

自引率

33.30%

发文量