The preferential treatment of green bonds

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Review of Economic Dynamics Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.red.2023.06.006
Francesco Giovanardi , Matthias Kaldorf , Lucas Radke , Florian Wicknig
{"title":"The preferential treatment of green bonds","authors":"Francesco Giovanardi ,&nbsp;Matthias Kaldorf ,&nbsp;Lucas Radke ,&nbsp;Florian Wicknig","doi":"10.1016/j.red.2023.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>We study the preferential treatment of green bonds in the central bank collateral framework as a climate policy instrument within a </span>DSGE model<span> with climate and financial frictions. In the model, green and carbon-emitting conventional firms issue defaultable corporate bonds to banks that use them as collateral, subject to haircuts determined by the central bank. A haircut reduction induces firms to increase bond issuance, investment, leverage, and default risk. Collateral policy solves a trade-off between increasing collateral supply, adverse effects on firm risk-taking, and subsidizing green investment. Optimal collateral policy is characterized by a haircut gap of 20 percentage points, which increases the green investment share and reduces emissions. However, welfare gains fall well short of what can be achieved with optimal carbon taxes. Moreover, due to elevated risk-taking of green firms, preferential treatment is a qualitatively imperfect substitute of Pigouvian taxation on emissions: if and only if the optimal emission tax can not be implemented, optimal collateral policy features a preferential treatment of green bonds.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":47890,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economic Dynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economic Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109420252300025X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study the preferential treatment of green bonds in the central bank collateral framework as a climate policy instrument within a DSGE model with climate and financial frictions. In the model, green and carbon-emitting conventional firms issue defaultable corporate bonds to banks that use them as collateral, subject to haircuts determined by the central bank. A haircut reduction induces firms to increase bond issuance, investment, leverage, and default risk. Collateral policy solves a trade-off between increasing collateral supply, adverse effects on firm risk-taking, and subsidizing green investment. Optimal collateral policy is characterized by a haircut gap of 20 percentage points, which increases the green investment share and reduces emissions. However, welfare gains fall well short of what can be achieved with optimal carbon taxes. Moreover, due to elevated risk-taking of green firms, preferential treatment is a qualitatively imperfect substitute of Pigouvian taxation on emissions: if and only if the optimal emission tax can not be implemented, optimal collateral policy features a preferential treatment of green bonds.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿色债券的优惠待遇
我们在一个具有气候和金融摩擦的 DSGE 模型中研究了在中央银行抵押品框架内作为气候政策工具的绿色债券的优惠待遇。在该模型中,绿色和碳排放的传统企业向银行发行可违约公司债券,银行将其作为抵押品,但须遵守中央银行确定的扣减率。扣减诱导企业增加债券发行、投资、杠杆率和违约风险。抵押品政策解决了增加抵押品供应、对企业承担风险的不利影响以及补贴绿色投资之间的权衡问题。最佳抵押品政策的特征是 20 个百分点的扣减差距,这将增加绿色投资份额并减少排放。然而,福利收益远低于最佳碳税所能达到的水平。此外,由于绿色企业的风险承担能力较强,优惠待遇在质量上并不能完全替代猪排放税:如果且仅当最优排放税无法实施时,最优抵押品政策才会对绿色债券给予优惠待遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Review of Economic Dynamics publishes meritorious original contributions to dynamic economics. The scope of the journal is intended to be broad and to reflect the view of the Society for Economic Dynamics that the field of economics is unified by the scientific approach to economics. We will publish contributions in any area of economics provided they meet the highest standards of scientific research.
期刊最新文献
Cyclical worker flows: Cleansing vs. sullying One rule fits all? Heterogeneous fiscal rules for commodity exporters when price shocks can be persistent: Theory and evidence Editorial Board Publisher's Note Monetary non-neutrality in a multisector economy: The role of risk-sharing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1