The Effect Learning Method on Students’ Speaking Skill and Critical Thinking at STKIP Kusuma Negara Jakarta

Q4 Arts and Humanities Scope Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.30998/scope.v8i1.19341
Megawati Megawati
{"title":"The Effect Learning Method on Students’ Speaking Skill and Critical Thinking at STKIP Kusuma Negara Jakarta","authors":"Megawati Megawati","doi":"10.30998/scope.v8i1.19341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div class=\"WordSection1\"><p><span lang=\"EN-US\">This research aims to identify the effect of learning method on students’ speaking skill, the effect learning method on critical thinking, and the effect learning method learning method on students’ speaking skill and critical thinking. Lecturer was chosen Students Team Achievement Division (STAD) and Jigsaw. Through learning method, researcher supposed to the students to get fluency in speaking English This research uses experimental research. Sample of this research was 30 students sixth semester Educational English Program at STKIP Kusumanegara. It was divided into two classes, that is, experiment class and control class. Collecting of the data was by using questionnaire and test speaking. Data was analysed using Kolmogorov Smirnow, to identify the data was normality. Then data was analysed by using Levenue to define that the data was homogeinity. It was obtained hypothesis, from the table Multivariate Test with F=74.642, sig 0.000 (&amp;lt;0.05). The results show that there is significant effect learning method towards Speaking Skills and Critical Thinking. It represents that F=145.499, p-value for category speaking skill (Y1) is 0.000 (&amp;lt;0.05), in which H0 is rejected or there is differences significant between students’ speaking skill in students’ group which was given by learning method with STAD with students’ speaking skill in students’ group which was given by learning method with Jigsaw. It represents that F=145.499, p-value for category critical thinking (Y2) is 0.000 (&amp;lt;0.05), in which H0 is rejected or there is differences significant between critical thinking in students’ group which was given by learning method with STAD with critical thinking in students’ group which was given by learning method with Jigsaw.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":35166,"journal":{"name":"Scope","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scope","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v8i1.19341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to identify the effect of learning method on students’ speaking skill, the effect learning method on critical thinking, and the effect learning method learning method on students’ speaking skill and critical thinking. Lecturer was chosen Students Team Achievement Division (STAD) and Jigsaw. Through learning method, researcher supposed to the students to get fluency in speaking English This research uses experimental research. Sample of this research was 30 students sixth semester Educational English Program at STKIP Kusumanegara. It was divided into two classes, that is, experiment class and control class. Collecting of the data was by using questionnaire and test speaking. Data was analysed using Kolmogorov Smirnow, to identify the data was normality. Then data was analysed by using Levenue to define that the data was homogeinity. It was obtained hypothesis, from the table Multivariate Test with F=74.642, sig 0.000 (&lt;0.05). The results show that there is significant effect learning method towards Speaking Skills and Critical Thinking. It represents that F=145.499, p-value for category speaking skill (Y1) is 0.000 (&lt;0.05), in which H0 is rejected or there is differences significant between students’ speaking skill in students’ group which was given by learning method with STAD with students’ speaking skill in students’ group which was given by learning method with Jigsaw. It represents that F=145.499, p-value for category critical thinking (Y2) is 0.000 (&lt;0.05), in which H0 is rejected or there is differences significant between critical thinking in students’ group which was given by learning method with STAD with critical thinking in students’ group which was given by learning method with Jigsaw.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
效果学习方法对学生口语技巧和批判性思维的影响
<div class="WordSection1">< ><span lang="EN-US">本研究旨在确定学习方法对学生口语技能的影响,效果学习方法对批判性思维的影响,以及效果学习方法对学生口语技能和批判性思维的影响。讲师被选为学生团队成就部(STAD)和拼图。通过学习的方法,研究者希望学生能够流利地说英语,本研究采用实验研究。本研究的样本是30名学生的第六学期教育英语课程在STKIP Kusumanegara。它被分为两个班,即实验班和对照组。数据的收集采用问卷调查法和口语测试法。使用Kolmogorov Smirnow分析数据,确定数据为正态性。然后用Levenue对数据进行分析,定义数据为同质性。通过表多元检验得到假设,F=74.642, sig 0.000 (<0.05)。结果表明,学习方法对口语技能和批判性思维有显著的影响。表示F=145.499,类别口语技能(Y1)的p值为0.000 (<0.05),其中H0被拒绝,或者使用STAD学习方法的学生组中学生的口语技能与使用Jigsaw学习方法的学生组中学生的口语技能存在显著差异。表示F=145.499,类别批判性思维(Y2)的p值为0.000 (<0.05),其中H0被拒绝,或者使用STAD学习方法的学生组批判性思维与使用Jigsaw学习方法的学生组批判性思维存在显著差异。</span></p></div>
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scope
Scope Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Using Rosetta Stone Application as a Mobile Assited Language Learning (MALL) in EFL: Documentary Study The Effects of Self-Directed Learning Strategy on Studints’ Reading Comprehension Skills Variation Language Content Analysis Book (A Need Analysis Study) Discourse Content Analysis of Illocutionary Speech Act in Pragmatic Text An Analysis of Abbreviation on the University Students’ Speech
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1