Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Immediate Sequential and Delayed Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery

Sam Young Jung, Jae Hyun Park, So-Hyang Chung
{"title":"Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Immediate Sequential and Delayed Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery","authors":"Sam Young Jung, Jae Hyun Park, So-Hyang Chung","doi":"10.3341/jkos.2023.64.10.892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: We compared the efficacy and safety of immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) and delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS).Methods: We analyzed the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent (SE), and mean absolute error (MAE) in the ISBSC and DSBSC groups. The study population comprised 72 patients (144 eyes) who underwent ISBCS and 92 patients (184 eyes) who underwent DSBCS at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital between January 2019 and December 2021.Results: At 1 month postoperatively, the ISBCS group demonstrated a BCVA, SE, and MAE of 0.11 ± 0.09, -0.33 ± 0.42 diopters (D), and 0.38 ± 0.32 D, respectively; similarly, the DSBCS group exhibited a BCVA, SE, and MAE of 0.11 ± 0.15, -0.29 ± 0.56 D, and 0.41 ± 0.43 D, respectively. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the ISBCS and the DSBCS groups regarding SE and MAE at the 1-month follow-up for the first and second operated eyes. No cases of postoperative endophthalmitis and toxic anterior segment syndrome were reported.Conclusions: ISBCS is an effective and cost-effective approach that yields favorable postoperative outcomes when performed by an experienced surgeon supported by appropriate pre- and postoperative care, particularly in patients who demonstrate good cooperation.","PeriodicalId":17341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Korean Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2023.64.10.892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We compared the efficacy and safety of immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery (ISBCS) and delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery (DSBCS).Methods: We analyzed the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent (SE), and mean absolute error (MAE) in the ISBSC and DSBSC groups. The study population comprised 72 patients (144 eyes) who underwent ISBCS and 92 patients (184 eyes) who underwent DSBCS at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital between January 2019 and December 2021.Results: At 1 month postoperatively, the ISBCS group demonstrated a BCVA, SE, and MAE of 0.11 ± 0.09, -0.33 ± 0.42 diopters (D), and 0.38 ± 0.32 D, respectively; similarly, the DSBCS group exhibited a BCVA, SE, and MAE of 0.11 ± 0.15, -0.29 ± 0.56 D, and 0.41 ± 0.43 D, respectively. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the ISBCS and the DSBCS groups regarding SE and MAE at the 1-month follow-up for the first and second operated eyes. No cases of postoperative endophthalmitis and toxic anterior segment syndrome were reported.Conclusions: ISBCS is an effective and cost-effective approach that yields favorable postoperative outcomes when performed by an experienced surgeon supported by appropriate pre- and postoperative care, particularly in patients who demonstrate good cooperation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
即刻序贯与延迟序贯双侧白内障手术的疗效与安全性比较
目的:比较即时序贯双侧白内障手术(ISBCS)和延迟序贯双侧白内障手术(DSBCS)的疗效和安全性。方法:分析ISBSC组和DSBSC组的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、球面等效视力(SE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)。研究对象包括2019年1月至2021年12月在首尔圣玛丽医院接受ISBCS治疗的72名患者(144只眼睛)和接受DSBCS治疗的92名患者(184只眼睛)。结果:术后1个月,ISBCS组BCVA、SE和MAE分别为0.11±0.09、-0.33±0.42屈光度(D)和0.38±0.32 D;同样,DSBCS组BCVA、SE和MAE分别为0.11±0.15、-0.29±0.56 D和0.41±0.43 D。此外,ISBCS组和DSBCS组在第一次和第二次手术眼的1个月随访中,SE和MAE没有显著差异。术后无眼内炎及中毒性前段综合征病例报告。结论:ISBCS是一种有效且具有成本效益的方法,当由经验丰富的外科医生在适当的术前和术后护理的支持下实施时,特别是在表现出良好合作的患者中,可以获得良好的术后结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
期刊最新文献
Self-assessment of Visual Acuity Using a Smartphone Application The Diagnosis and Treatment of a Post-traumatic Iris Cyst Referred as an Iris Tumor Clinical Results of Prosthetic Eye Wear in Patients with Congenital Microphthalmos Two Cases of Ischemic Optic Neuropathy after Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Injection Frequency and Differences in Visual Outcomes based on Diagnosis Year in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1