{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Application of Universal Bonding on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Light Cure and Dual Cure Composites Bonded to Dentin","authors":"Ebrahim Yarmohamadi, Banafsheh Ahmadi, Maryam Farhadian","doi":"10.18502/fid.v20i39.13879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: There is limited knowledge on the efficacy of universal adhesives when used in different etching modes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin using universal adhesives with light-cure and dual-cure composites.
 Materials and Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, the occlusal third of 60 caries-free human molars were removed and the exposed surfaces were treated and allocated to 10 groups (N=6). Two different bonding agents (Single Bond Universal, G-Premio) were used to bond 2 different composite resins (Z250 light-cure and CoreFlo DC dual-cure) to dentin, using etch-and-rinse (E&R) and self-etch (SE) modes. Single Bond 2 was applied in E&R mode on wet dentin to serve as control. The specimens were sectioned into 1×1 mm2 sticks with a precision saw. A microtensile testing machine was used to measure the µTBS of the specimens with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test (α=0.05).
 Results: The Single Bond Universal group in SE mode with light-cure composite yielded the highest (39.24MPa), and the G-Premio SE group with dual-cure composite produced the lowest (13.65MPa) mean µTBS (P<0.05). The dominant failure mode was adhesive, in all groups.
 Conclusion: The bonding agent had a significant effect on µTBS of composite to dentin, but different composites and different etching modes were not significantly different in this respect.","PeriodicalId":12445,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dentistry","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v20i39.13879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: There is limited knowledge on the efficacy of universal adhesives when used in different etching modes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin using universal adhesives with light-cure and dual-cure composites.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, the occlusal third of 60 caries-free human molars were removed and the exposed surfaces were treated and allocated to 10 groups (N=6). Two different bonding agents (Single Bond Universal, G-Premio) were used to bond 2 different composite resins (Z250 light-cure and CoreFlo DC dual-cure) to dentin, using etch-and-rinse (E&R) and self-etch (SE) modes. Single Bond 2 was applied in E&R mode on wet dentin to serve as control. The specimens were sectioned into 1×1 mm2 sticks with a precision saw. A microtensile testing machine was used to measure the µTBS of the specimens with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test (α=0.05).
Results: The Single Bond Universal group in SE mode with light-cure composite yielded the highest (39.24MPa), and the G-Premio SE group with dual-cure composite produced the lowest (13.65MPa) mean µTBS (P<0.05). The dominant failure mode was adhesive, in all groups.
Conclusion: The bonding agent had a significant effect on µTBS of composite to dentin, but different composites and different etching modes were not significantly different in this respect.
目的:在不同蚀刻模式下使用通用胶粘剂的功效方面的知识有限。本研究的目的是评估使用光固化和双固化复合材料的通用胶粘剂与牙本质的微拉伸结合强度(µTBS)。材料与方法:在体外实验研究中,取出60颗无龋人磨牙的咬合三分之一,处理暴露面,分为10组(N=6)。使用两种不同的粘结剂(Single Bond Universal, G-Premio)将2种不同的复合树脂(Z250光固化和CoreFlo DC双固化)粘合到牙本质上,采用蚀刻-冲洗(E&R)和自蚀刻(SE)模式。将Single Bond 2应用于湿牙本质的E&R模式作为对照。用精密锯将标本切成1×1 mm2的小棒。采用微拉伸试验机测量试件的µTBS,十字头速度为0.5 mm/min。数据分析采用三因素方差分析和Bonferroni事后检验(α=0.05)。结果:Single Bond Universal组SE模式下光固化复合材料产生的平均µTBS最高(39.24MPa), G-Premio SE模式下双固化复合材料产生的平均µTBS最低(13.65MPa) (P<0.05)。所有组的主要破坏模式均为粘附破坏。
结论:粘结剂对复合材料对牙本质的µTBS有显著影响,但不同的复合材料和不同的蚀刻方式在这方面没有显著差异。