Prognostic modeling in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using deep learning

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Imaging Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.oa4851
Neha Anegondi, Yixuan Zou, Xuefeng Hou, Mohammadreza Negahdar, Dorothy Cheung, Paula Belloni, Alex De Crespigny, Alexandre Fernandez Coimbra
{"title":"Prognostic modeling in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using deep learning","authors":"Neha Anegondi, Yixuan Zou, Xuefeng Hou, Mohammadreza Negahdar, Dorothy Cheung, Paula Belloni, Alex De Crespigny, Alexandre Fernandez Coimbra","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.oa4851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction:</b> Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) results in lung function decline. Prognostic models that accurately predict IPF progression could inform research studies and clinical care. <b>Objectives:</b> To develop deep learning (DL) models to predict IPF progression using baseline high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective analysis was performed on IPF patients enrolled in clinical trials (NCT01872689, NCT00287729, NCT01366209). Only baseline visit HRCT (non-contrast, supine position, full inspiration) were included in the analysis. The image dataset was split into training (n = 274) and holdout (n = 117). The training dataset was then split into 5 folds for cross-validation (CV). Two multi-task DL models [HRCT-only and multi-modal (HRCT and baseline clinical features)] were trained to simultaneously predict 3 endpoints: FVC at 1 year (mL), FVC change at 1 year (mL) and FVC slope (mL/year). The performance of the DL models were benchmarked with a linear model using baseline clinical features and evaluated using squared Pearson correlation coefficient (r<sup>2</sup>). <b>Results:</b> The multi-modal model had the best CV performance on training set with mean r<sup>2</sup> of 0.87, 0.13, and 0.14 for FVC at 1 year, FVC change at 1 year, and FVC slope. On the holdout set, the same model showed r<sup>2</sup> of 0.88, 0.11, and 0.12. In comparison, the benchmark model had a mean r<sup>2</sup> of 0.85, 0.05, and 0.05 on the training set and 0.89, 0.04, and 0.04 on the holdout set, respectively, for the 3 endpoints. <b>Conclusion:</b> HRCT scans add marginal value to baseline clinical features in predicting IPF progression. Further work is required to improve the performance of the current models for potential use in research studies and clinical care.","PeriodicalId":34850,"journal":{"name":"Imaging","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.oa4851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) results in lung function decline. Prognostic models that accurately predict IPF progression could inform research studies and clinical care. Objectives: To develop deep learning (DL) models to predict IPF progression using baseline high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on IPF patients enrolled in clinical trials (NCT01872689, NCT00287729, NCT01366209). Only baseline visit HRCT (non-contrast, supine position, full inspiration) were included in the analysis. The image dataset was split into training (n = 274) and holdout (n = 117). The training dataset was then split into 5 folds for cross-validation (CV). Two multi-task DL models [HRCT-only and multi-modal (HRCT and baseline clinical features)] were trained to simultaneously predict 3 endpoints: FVC at 1 year (mL), FVC change at 1 year (mL) and FVC slope (mL/year). The performance of the DL models were benchmarked with a linear model using baseline clinical features and evaluated using squared Pearson correlation coefficient (r2). Results: The multi-modal model had the best CV performance on training set with mean r2 of 0.87, 0.13, and 0.14 for FVC at 1 year, FVC change at 1 year, and FVC slope. On the holdout set, the same model showed r2 of 0.88, 0.11, and 0.12. In comparison, the benchmark model had a mean r2 of 0.85, 0.05, and 0.05 on the training set and 0.89, 0.04, and 0.04 on the holdout set, respectively, for the 3 endpoints. Conclusion: HRCT scans add marginal value to baseline clinical features in predicting IPF progression. Further work is required to improve the performance of the current models for potential use in research studies and clinical care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于深度学习的特发性肺纤维化预后建模
特发性肺纤维化(IPF)导致肺功能下降。准确预测IPF进展的预后模型可以为研究和临床护理提供信息。目的:开发深度学习(DL)模型,利用基线高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)预测IPF进展。方法:回顾性分析纳入临床试验的IPF患者(NCT01872689、NCT00287729、NCT01366209)。仅基线HRCT(非对比、仰卧位、充分吸气)纳入分析。图像数据集分为训练(n = 274)和保留(n = 117)。然后将训练数据集分成5组进行交叉验证(CV)。训练两个多任务深度学习模型[仅HRCT和多模式(HRCT和基线临床特征)],同时预测3个终点:1年FVC (mL), 1年FVC变化(mL)和FVC斜率(mL/年)。DL模型的性能以基线临床特征的线性模型为基准,并使用平方Pearson相关系数(r2)进行评估。结果:多模态模型在训练集上的CV表现最佳,1年植被覆盖度、1年植被覆盖度变化和植被覆盖度斜率的平均r2分别为0.87、0.13和0.14。在拒绝组上,同样的模型显示r2为0.88、0.11和0.12。相比之下,基准模型在训练集上的平均r2分别为0.85、0.05和0.05,在保留集上的平均r2分别为0.89、0.04和0.04。结论:HRCT扫描在预测IPF进展方面增加了基线临床特征的边缘价值。为了在研究和临床护理中潜在的使用,需要进一步的工作来改进当前模型的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Imaging
Imaging MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Radiographic analysis provides evidence for the etiology of pulmonary cysts in COVID-19 Dieulafoy's lesion, the endovascular approach as a therapeutic option when endoscopic treatment has failed: A case report and brief review Three-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiography in Cor Triatriatum Sinister: Make new friends but keep the old Colonic basidiobolomycosis masquerading as colon cancer with liver metastasis: A case report and review of literature Dual-energy CT in the emergency department: A pictorial essay from a single center experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1