Machine learning applied to chest x-rays to support the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Imaging Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa2288
Marcelo Fouad Rabahi, Poliana Parreira, Afonso Fonseca, Fabrizzio Soares, Marcus Barreto Conte
{"title":"Machine learning applied to chest x-rays to support the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis","authors":"Marcelo Fouad Rabahi, Poliana Parreira, Afonso Fonseca, Fabrizzio Soares, Marcus Barreto Conte","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa2288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2019, around 10 million people were diagnosed with tuberculosis worldwide, resulting in 1.2 million deaths (WHO, 2020). Among imaging methods, chest X-ray (CXR) is the choice for the initial assessment of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). Recent advancement in the field of artificial intelligence has stimulated studies evaluating the performance of machine learning (ML) for medical diagnosis. This study aimed to validate a new original Brazilian tool, titled xmarTB, applied to CXR images to support the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). The model was trained on 3800 normal images, 3800 altered without PTB and 1376 with manifestations of PTB, from the publicly available TBX11K database. The binary classification model could distinguish between normal and abnormal CXR with a sensitivity of 99.42% and specificity of 99.40%. To detect cases of tuberculosis among CXR with alterations, the xmarTB tool obtained a sensitivity of 98.11% and a specificity of 99.74%. Therefore, applying this diagnostic tool to CXR images can accurately and automatically detect abnormal radiographs and differentiate pulmonary tuberculosis from other pulmonary diseases satisfactorily. This tool offers great potential to assist the diagnosis made by the radiologist, offering more certainty and agility, thus increasing the excellence of the professional9s performance. As emphasized by the European Society of Radiology (ESR. Insights Imaging 2022; 13:43), diagnostic ML should not replace radiologists, since beyond the diagnosis there is still the need for patient communication and interaction, human judgment for intervention and treatment, quality control, continued education and policy formulation.","PeriodicalId":34850,"journal":{"name":"Imaging","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa2288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2019, around 10 million people were diagnosed with tuberculosis worldwide, resulting in 1.2 million deaths (WHO, 2020). Among imaging methods, chest X-ray (CXR) is the choice for the initial assessment of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). Recent advancement in the field of artificial intelligence has stimulated studies evaluating the performance of machine learning (ML) for medical diagnosis. This study aimed to validate a new original Brazilian tool, titled xmarTB, applied to CXR images to support the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). The model was trained on 3800 normal images, 3800 altered without PTB and 1376 with manifestations of PTB, from the publicly available TBX11K database. The binary classification model could distinguish between normal and abnormal CXR with a sensitivity of 99.42% and specificity of 99.40%. To detect cases of tuberculosis among CXR with alterations, the xmarTB tool obtained a sensitivity of 98.11% and a specificity of 99.74%. Therefore, applying this diagnostic tool to CXR images can accurately and automatically detect abnormal radiographs and differentiate pulmonary tuberculosis from other pulmonary diseases satisfactorily. This tool offers great potential to assist the diagnosis made by the radiologist, offering more certainty and agility, thus increasing the excellence of the professional9s performance. As emphasized by the European Society of Radiology (ESR. Insights Imaging 2022; 13:43), diagnostic ML should not replace radiologists, since beyond the diagnosis there is still the need for patient communication and interaction, human judgment for intervention and treatment, quality control, continued education and policy formulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习应用于胸部x光片,以支持肺结核的诊断
2019年,全球约有1000万人被诊断患有结核病,导致120万人死亡(世卫组织,2020年)。在影像学方法中,胸部x线(CXR)是初步评估肺结核(PTB)的首选。人工智能领域的最新进展刺激了评估机器学习(ML)在医学诊断中的性能的研究。本研究旨在验证一种名为xmarTB的巴西新工具,该工具应用于CXR图像以支持肺结核(PTB)的诊断。该模型使用来自TBX11K数据库的3800张正常图像、3800张无PTB改变图像和1376张有PTB表现的图像进行训练。二元分类模型区分正常与异常CXR的敏感性为99.42%,特异性为99.40%。在CXR中检测结核病例时,xmarTB工具的灵敏度为98.11%,特异性为99.74%。因此,将该诊断工具应用于CXR图像,可以准确、自动地发现异常x线片,令人满意地区分肺结核与其他肺部疾病。该工具为放射科医生的诊断提供了巨大的潜力,提供了更多的确定性和灵活性,从而提高了专业人员的卓越表现。正如欧洲放射学会(ESR)所强调的。Insights Imaging 2022;13:43),诊断机器学习不应该取代放射科医生,因为除了诊断之外,仍然需要患者的沟通和互动,干预和治疗的人为判断,质量控制,继续教育和政策制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Imaging
Imaging MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Radiographic analysis provides evidence for the etiology of pulmonary cysts in COVID-19 Dieulafoy's lesion, the endovascular approach as a therapeutic option when endoscopic treatment has failed: A case report and brief review Three-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiography in Cor Triatriatum Sinister: Make new friends but keep the old Colonic basidiobolomycosis masquerading as colon cancer with liver metastasis: A case report and review of literature Dual-energy CT in the emergency department: A pictorial essay from a single center experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1