Comparison of parenchyma density scoring in RA-ILD vs IPF and iNSIP

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Imaging Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.oa4854
Bálint Ács, Miklós Zsiray, Diana Solymosi, Réka Gajdócsi, Tünde Harkó, Vivien Leskó-Jancsó, Anna Kerpel-Fronius
{"title":"Comparison of parenchyma density scoring in RA-ILD vs IPF and iNSIP","authors":"Bálint Ács, Miklós Zsiray, Diana Solymosi, Réka Gajdócsi, Tünde Harkó, Vivien Leskó-Jancsó, Anna Kerpel-Fronius","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.oa4854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>1. Introduction:</b> The area of the affected lung parenchyma can influence mortality in any interstitial lung disease (ILD), so we analysed three groups - rheumatoid arthritis (RA) associated ILD, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (iNSIP) to identify measurable HRCT features. <b>2. Methods:</b> All patients referred to MDTs with RA-ILD, iNSIP and IPF between 2016 - 2022, with high quality HRCT scans (both&nbsp; in- and expiration) were included in our study. 17 RA-ILD, 26 iNSIP and 72 IPF patients were identified. The scans were analyzed using the Syngo Via (vs60) PulmoAnalysis software, calculating areas of increased density. Data was analyzed using usual statistical methods. <b>3. Results:</b> Lung parenchyma was evaluated by the percentage of opacity, opacity score and other relating values. In RA-ILD cases lower opacity percentage was detected compared to IPF and iNSIP cases (mean value of 10,04% vs 25,1% and 19,1% during inspiration in both lungs). This data was compared to concurrent pulmonary function test results. <b>4. Conclusions:</b> The software aided data collection correlates well with clinical severity but further studies need to evaluate its position in the management of ILD patients.","PeriodicalId":34850,"journal":{"name":"Imaging","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.oa4854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1. Introduction: The area of the affected lung parenchyma can influence mortality in any interstitial lung disease (ILD), so we analysed three groups - rheumatoid arthritis (RA) associated ILD, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (iNSIP) to identify measurable HRCT features. 2. Methods: All patients referred to MDTs with RA-ILD, iNSIP and IPF between 2016 - 2022, with high quality HRCT scans (both  in- and expiration) were included in our study. 17 RA-ILD, 26 iNSIP and 72 IPF patients were identified. The scans were analyzed using the Syngo Via (vs60) PulmoAnalysis software, calculating areas of increased density. Data was analyzed using usual statistical methods. 3. Results: Lung parenchyma was evaluated by the percentage of opacity, opacity score and other relating values. In RA-ILD cases lower opacity percentage was detected compared to IPF and iNSIP cases (mean value of 10,04% vs 25,1% and 19,1% during inspiration in both lungs). This data was compared to concurrent pulmonary function test results. 4. Conclusions: The software aided data collection correlates well with clinical severity but further studies need to evaluate its position in the management of ILD patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RA-ILD与IPF和iNSIP的实质组织密度评分比较
1. 简介:受影响的肺实质面积可影响任何间质性肺病(ILD)的死亡率,因此我们分析了三组-类风湿关节炎(RA)相关ILD,特发性肺纤维化(IPF)和特发性非特异性间质性肺炎(iNSIP)以确定可测量的HRCT特征。2. 方法:所有在2016 - 2022年期间就诊的伴有RA-ILD、iNSIP和IPF的MDTs患者,均采用高质量的HRCT扫描(均为 在我们的研究中包括了过期和过期。RA-ILD 17例,iNSIP 26例,IPF 72例。扫描结果使用Syngo Via (vs60) PulmoAnalysis软件进行分析,计算密度增加的区域。采用常用的统计学方法对数据进行分析。3.结果:以肺实质混浊率、混浊评分等相关指标评价肺实质。在RA-ILD病例中,与IPF和iNSIP病例相比,检测到的混浊率较低(双肺吸气时的平均值为10.04%,分别为25.1%和19.1%)。将该数据与同期肺功能测试结果进行比较。4. 结论:软件辅助数据收集与临床严重程度有良好的相关性,但需要进一步的研究来评估其在ILD患者管理中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Imaging
Imaging MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Radiographic analysis provides evidence for the etiology of pulmonary cysts in COVID-19 Dieulafoy's lesion, the endovascular approach as a therapeutic option when endoscopic treatment has failed: A case report and brief review Three-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiography in Cor Triatriatum Sinister: Make new friends but keep the old Colonic basidiobolomycosis masquerading as colon cancer with liver metastasis: A case report and review of literature Dual-energy CT in the emergency department: A pictorial essay from a single center experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1