Optimized detection of pulmonary emphysema on CT scans of lung cancer screening participants

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Imaging Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa4003
Hailan Liu, Daiwei Han, Marleen Vonder, Marjolein Heuvelmans, Jaeyoun Yi, Zhaoxiang Ye, Harry De Koning, Matthijs Oudkerk
{"title":"Optimized detection of pulmonary emphysema on CT scans of lung cancer screening participants","authors":"Hailan Liu, Daiwei Han, Marleen Vonder, Marjolein Heuvelmans, Jaeyoun Yi, Zhaoxiang Ye, Harry De Koning, Matthijs Oudkerk","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa4003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction:</b> Visual CT emphysema scoring&nbsp;has&nbsp;been shown to improve the prediction of lung cancer mortality and COPD death, but optimal Hounsfield unit (HU) threshold for emphysema detection has&nbsp;not&nbsp;been determined for lung cancer screening (LCS) subjects. <b>Objectives:</b> To find the optimal HU threshold for&nbsp;the early detection of emphysema in a low dose CT (LDCT) LCS dataset. <b>Methods:</b> 352&nbsp;participants&nbsp;were selected&nbsp;from a&nbsp;LCS dataset with LDCT&nbsp;using Definition AS, at inspiration in spiral mode at 120 kVp and 35 mAs. Images were reconstructed with B30f&nbsp;kernel at 2.0/1.0 mm thickness. Emphysema was quantified below a range of HU&nbsp;thresholds from −900 to −1,024&nbsp;HU, while excluding the vessels and bronchus. One radiologist (reader A) and two trainees (reader B&nbsp;and&nbsp;C) visually scored emphysema according to the Fleischner criteria. Kappa statistics, Spearman analysis and ROC&nbsp;(Receiver operating characteristic) are used to assess the correlation between quantified emphysema&nbsp;under different HU thresholds and visual emphysema. <b>Results:</b> High agreement in the detection of emphysema was found (Kappa: 0.728 – 0.835).&nbsp;The spearman analysis demonstrated that emphysema volume under different thresholds&nbsp;is significantly correlated to the visual classification&nbsp;(P<0,05). ROC showed -1000 HU&nbsp;to be optimal for discrimination between normal and emphysematous lung parenchyma when correlated to visual scoring for all readers, by excluding all influence of noise on voxel quantification.&nbsp;Despite of noise correction, the emphysema voxel counting suffers from this threshold. <b>Conclusions:</b> The optimal threshold for noise cancelation in emphysema quantification was established to be -1000 HU&nbsp;in a LDCT LCS dataset.","PeriodicalId":34850,"journal":{"name":"Imaging","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa4003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Visual CT emphysema scoring has been shown to improve the prediction of lung cancer mortality and COPD death, but optimal Hounsfield unit (HU) threshold for emphysema detection has not been determined for lung cancer screening (LCS) subjects. Objectives: To find the optimal HU threshold for the early detection of emphysema in a low dose CT (LDCT) LCS dataset. Methods: 352 participants were selected from a LCS dataset with LDCT using Definition AS, at inspiration in spiral mode at 120 kVp and 35 mAs. Images were reconstructed with B30f kernel at 2.0/1.0 mm thickness. Emphysema was quantified below a range of HU thresholds from −900 to −1,024 HU, while excluding the vessels and bronchus. One radiologist (reader A) and two trainees (reader B and C) visually scored emphysema according to the Fleischner criteria. Kappa statistics, Spearman analysis and ROC (Receiver operating characteristic) are used to assess the correlation between quantified emphysema under different HU thresholds and visual emphysema. Results: High agreement in the detection of emphysema was found (Kappa: 0.728 – 0.835). The spearman analysis demonstrated that emphysema volume under different thresholds is significantly correlated to the visual classification (P<0,05). ROC showed -1000 HU to be optimal for discrimination between normal and emphysematous lung parenchyma when correlated to visual scoring for all readers, by excluding all influence of noise on voxel quantification. Despite of noise correction, the emphysema voxel counting suffers from this threshold. Conclusions: The optimal threshold for noise cancelation in emphysema quantification was established to be -1000 HU in a LDCT LCS dataset.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺癌筛查参与者CT扫描肺气肿的优化检测
导论:视觉CT肺气肿评分已被证明可以提高肺癌死亡率和COPD死亡率的预测,但对于肺癌筛查(LCS)受试者,肺气肿检测的最佳Hounsfield单位(HU)阈值尚未确定。目的:寻找低剂量CT (LDCT) LCS数据集早期发现肺气肿的最佳HU阈值。方法:在120 kVp和35 ma的螺旋模式下,使用Definition AS从具有LDCT 的LCS数据集中选择352名参与者。用2.0/1.0 mm厚度的B30f kernel重建图像。在排除血管和支气管的情况下,肺气肿在- 900至- 1,024 HU阈值范围内量化。一名放射科医生(读者A)和两名实习生(读者B 和 C)根据Fleischner标准对肺气肿进行视觉评分。采用Kappa统计、Spearman分析和roc (Receiver operating characteristic)评估不同HU阈值下量化肺气肿与目视肺气肿的相关性。结果:肺气肿的检测一致性较高(Kappa: 0.728 - 0.835)。spearman分析显示,不同阈值下的肺气肿体积与视觉分类有显著相关性(P<0,05)。ROC显示,当与所有读者的视觉评分相关时,通过排除噪声对体素量化的所有影响,-1000 hu是区分正常和肺气肿性肺实质的最佳值。尽管进行了噪声校正,肺气肿体素计数仍然存在这个阈值。结论:在LDCT LCS数据集中,肺气肿量化噪声消除的最佳阈值为-1000 hu。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Imaging
Imaging MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Radiographic analysis provides evidence for the etiology of pulmonary cysts in COVID-19 Dieulafoy's lesion, the endovascular approach as a therapeutic option when endoscopic treatment has failed: A case report and brief review Three-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiography in Cor Triatriatum Sinister: Make new friends but keep the old Colonic basidiobolomycosis masquerading as colon cancer with liver metastasis: A case report and review of literature Dual-energy CT in the emergency department: A pictorial essay from a single center experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1