Longevity of ceramic restoring materials in the confection of endocrowns restorations: an in vitro study on surface roughness and mechanical strength

Clarisse Maria Luiz SILVA, Taynara Franciele da Silva SOUZA, Agatha Christie Martins RAIMUNDO, Antônio TORRES NETO, Manassés Tercio Vieira GRANGEIRO, Viviane Maria Gonçalves de FIGUEIREDO
{"title":"Longevity of ceramic restoring materials in the confection of endocrowns restorations: an in vitro study on surface roughness and mechanical strength","authors":"Clarisse Maria Luiz SILVA, Taynara Franciele da Silva SOUZA, Agatha Christie Martins RAIMUNDO, Antônio TORRES NETO, Manassés Tercio Vieira GRANGEIRO, Viviane Maria Gonçalves de FIGUEIREDO","doi":"10.1590/1981-86372023005020230003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objectives: The objective was to evaluate the longevity of ceramic restorative materials in the manufacture of endocrown restorations, through an in vitro study on surface roughness and mechanical strength. Methods: Three restorative materials were evaluated and assigned to experimental groups (n=10 disc specimens): Leucite Reinforced Ceramic, Lithium Disilicate and Nanoceramic Resin. These restorative materials were evaluated for surface before and after aging (n=02 specimens) under a stereomicroscope. The specimens were submitted to the average surface roughness test (Ra) (n=10) in a contact roughness meter before and after aging. As well as the biaxial flexural strength test (n=10), after aging, up to a test speed of 0.5 mm/min. Aging was carried out in a thermocycler, with 5,000 cycles with baths of 5 °C ± 1 ° and 55 °C ± 1 °. Fragments after fracture were observed under a stereomicroscope. The data obtained were tabulated and analyzed using the Minitab statistical program. Results: The surfaces of the specimens do not show changes between the restorative materials and also in relation to aging. For the roughness data, the restorative material factors (p=0.867) and aging (p=0.321) were not statistically significant. The DIS group presented the highest values of fracture resistance (p=0.000), in relation to the LEU and REN groups, which were statistically similar. The same statistical pattern was identified for post-fracture fragment data (p=0.030). Conclusions: The aging factors and restorative material do not interfere with the surface roughness performance. However, the mechanical performance and number of fragments after fracture is affected by the restorative material.","PeriodicalId":30069,"journal":{"name":"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-86372023005020230003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: The objective was to evaluate the longevity of ceramic restorative materials in the manufacture of endocrown restorations, through an in vitro study on surface roughness and mechanical strength. Methods: Three restorative materials were evaluated and assigned to experimental groups (n=10 disc specimens): Leucite Reinforced Ceramic, Lithium Disilicate and Nanoceramic Resin. These restorative materials were evaluated for surface before and after aging (n=02 specimens) under a stereomicroscope. The specimens were submitted to the average surface roughness test (Ra) (n=10) in a contact roughness meter before and after aging. As well as the biaxial flexural strength test (n=10), after aging, up to a test speed of 0.5 mm/min. Aging was carried out in a thermocycler, with 5,000 cycles with baths of 5 °C ± 1 ° and 55 °C ± 1 °. Fragments after fracture were observed under a stereomicroscope. The data obtained were tabulated and analyzed using the Minitab statistical program. Results: The surfaces of the specimens do not show changes between the restorative materials and also in relation to aging. For the roughness data, the restorative material factors (p=0.867) and aging (p=0.321) were not statistically significant. The DIS group presented the highest values of fracture resistance (p=0.000), in relation to the LEU and REN groups, which were statistically similar. The same statistical pattern was identified for post-fracture fragment data (p=0.030). Conclusions: The aging factors and restorative material do not interfere with the surface roughness performance. However, the mechanical performance and number of fragments after fracture is affected by the restorative material.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
陶瓷修复材料在牙髓修复体配制中的寿命:表面粗糙度和机械强度的体外研究
摘要:目的是通过对表面粗糙度和机械强度的体外研究,评估陶瓷修复材料在制造内冠修复体中的使用寿命。方法:评估三种修复材料,并将其分为实验组(n=10个圆盘标本):白晶石增强陶瓷、二硅酸锂和纳米陶瓷树脂。在体视显微镜下对这些修复材料老化前后的表面进行了评价(n=02个标本)。老化前后试样在接触粗糙度仪中进行平均表面粗糙度(Ra) (n=10)测试。以及双轴抗折强度试验(n=10),时效后,试验速度可达0.5 mm/min。在热循环器中进行老化,在5°C±1°和55°C±1°的温度下进行5000次循环。在体视显微镜下观察骨折后的碎片。使用Minitab统计程序对所得数据进行制表和分析。结果:修复材料对试样表面无明显影响,且与老化有关。对于粗糙度数据,修复材料因素(p=0.867)和老化因素(p=0.321)无统计学意义。与LEU组和REN组相比,DIS组的抗骨折性最高(p=0.000),差异有统计学意义。骨折后碎片数据也发现了相同的统计模式(p=0.030)。结论:老化因素和修复材料对表面粗糙度无影响。然而,断裂后的力学性能和碎片数量受修复材料的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sleep disorders are associated with both morning temporal and jaw pain among adults and elderly: a population-based study in Brazil Radiolucent image in lower third molar: hidden caries or pre-eruptive resorption?: a case report Edentulism and number of medications are associated with nutritional status in older adults: a population-based cross-sectional study Fluoride in Mozambique: retrospective study Evidence-practice gap in treatment recommendations for proximal caries among Brazilian dentists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1