{"title":"Animals and Us, Us as Animals","authors":"Vojko Strahovnik","doi":"10.21860/j.14.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of animal ethics in philosophy has seen a variety of approaches since its recent resurgence. In this discussion, J. M. Coetzee’s book The Lives of Animals serves as a focal point. Two contrasting responses to Coetzee’s work are presented. The first response takes a traditional approach to the animal question, which aims to prevent suffering, improve animal welfare, and reject speciesism. The second response is more radical and emphasizes that the animal question is not just about animals, but also about us, human animals. This approach helpfully highlights the limitations of rational, philosophical thought when it comes to understanding the complexity of the animal question and ascribes the limitation to the phenomenon of the difficulty of reality.","PeriodicalId":250910,"journal":{"name":"Jahr - European journal of bioethics","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jahr - European journal of bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21860/j.14.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The field of animal ethics in philosophy has seen a variety of approaches since its recent resurgence. In this discussion, J. M. Coetzee’s book The Lives of Animals serves as a focal point. Two contrasting responses to Coetzee’s work are presented. The first response takes a traditional approach to the animal question, which aims to prevent suffering, improve animal welfare, and reject speciesism. The second response is more radical and emphasizes that the animal question is not just about animals, but also about us, human animals. This approach helpfully highlights the limitations of rational, philosophical thought when it comes to understanding the complexity of the animal question and ascribes the limitation to the phenomenon of the difficulty of reality.
哲学中的动物伦理领域自最近复苏以来出现了各种各样的方法。在这个讨论中,J. M. Coetzee的书《动物的生活》是一个焦点。对库切的工作提出了两种截然不同的回应。第一种回应是采用传统的方法来解决动物问题,其目的是防止痛苦,改善动物福利,并拒绝物种歧视。第二种回答更为激进,强调动物问题不仅与动物有关,也与我们人类有关。当涉及到理解动物问题的复杂性时,这种方法有助于强调理性和哲学思想的局限性,并将这种局限性归因于现实的困难现象。