Not All Porcine Intestinal Segments Are Equal in Terms of Breaking Force, but None Were Associated to Allometric Parameters

IF 0.7 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastroenterology Insights Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.3390/gastroent14040035
Tobias Kratz, Jan Dauvergne, Anne-Sophie Kronberg, David Katzer, Rainer Ganschow, Marit Bernhardt, Sarah Westeppe, Benjamin Bierbach, Joanna Strohm, Christina Oetzmann von Sochaczewski
{"title":"Not All Porcine Intestinal Segments Are Equal in Terms of Breaking Force, but None Were Associated to Allometric Parameters","authors":"Tobias Kratz, Jan Dauvergne, Anne-Sophie Kronberg, David Katzer, Rainer Ganschow, Marit Bernhardt, Sarah Westeppe, Benjamin Bierbach, Joanna Strohm, Christina Oetzmann von Sochaczewski","doi":"10.3390/gastroent14040035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biomechanics are gaining ground in gastroenterology in the creation of educational models and to describe the necessary forces to perforate hallow organs during endoscopy. We thus investigated the breaking forces of porcine intestinal segments and whether they could be predicted based on body weight or crown–rump length. Based on a priori power-analyses, 10 pigs were included. The breaking forces were determined with a motorized test stand. We found that the breaking forces of intestinal segments were different (H(6) = 33.7, p < 0.0001): Ileal breaking force (x¯ = 24.14 N) was higher than jejunal (x¯ = 14.24 N, p = 0.0082) and colonic (x¯ = 11.33 N, p < 0.0001) breaking force. The latter was also smaller than cecal breaking force (x¯ = 24.6 N, p = 0.0044). Likewise, rectal (x¯ = 23.57 N) breaking force was higher than jejunal (p = 0.0455) and colonic (p = 0.0006) breaking force. Breaking forces were not correlated to body weight or crown–rump length (R < 0.49, p > 0.148). Intestinal segments differ in their breaking forces. The colon had the least resistance to traction forces. It remains to be determined if similar relationships exist in humans in order to validate porcine models for endoscopy and surgery.","PeriodicalId":43586,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Insights","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent14040035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biomechanics are gaining ground in gastroenterology in the creation of educational models and to describe the necessary forces to perforate hallow organs during endoscopy. We thus investigated the breaking forces of porcine intestinal segments and whether they could be predicted based on body weight or crown–rump length. Based on a priori power-analyses, 10 pigs were included. The breaking forces were determined with a motorized test stand. We found that the breaking forces of intestinal segments were different (H(6) = 33.7, p < 0.0001): Ileal breaking force (x¯ = 24.14 N) was higher than jejunal (x¯ = 14.24 N, p = 0.0082) and colonic (x¯ = 11.33 N, p < 0.0001) breaking force. The latter was also smaller than cecal breaking force (x¯ = 24.6 N, p = 0.0044). Likewise, rectal (x¯ = 23.57 N) breaking force was higher than jejunal (p = 0.0455) and colonic (p = 0.0006) breaking force. Breaking forces were not correlated to body weight or crown–rump length (R < 0.49, p > 0.148). Intestinal segments differ in their breaking forces. The colon had the least resistance to traction forces. It remains to be determined if similar relationships exist in humans in order to validate porcine models for endoscopy and surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不是所有的猪肠段在断裂力方面都是相同的,但没有一个与异速参数相关
生物力学在胃肠病学教育模型的创建和描述内窥镜检查时穿孔中空器官的必要力量方面取得了进展。因此,我们研究了猪肠段的断裂力,以及它们是否可以根据体重或冠臀长来预测。根据先验功率分析,共纳入10头猪。断裂力由机动试验台测定。我们发现肠段断裂力不同(H(6) = 33.7, p <0.0001):回肠破肠力(x¯= 24.14 N)高于空肠(x¯= 14.24 N, p = 0.0082)和结肠(x¯= 11.33 N, p <0.0001)断裂力。后者也小于盲肠断裂力(x¯= 24.6 N, p = 0.0044)。同样,直肠(x¯= 23.57 N)破断力高于空肠(p = 0.0455)和结肠(p = 0.0006)破断力。断裂力与体重或冠臀长度无关(R <0.49, p >0.148)。肠段的断裂力不同。结肠对牵引力的阻力最小。为了验证内窥镜检查和手术的猪模型,人类是否存在类似的关系仍有待确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Insights
Gastroenterology Insights GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Right-Sided Dysplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is Not Associated with Conventional Risk Factors for Neoplasia. Correlation between Interleukin-17, High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Pepsinogen in Helicobacter pylori Infected Gastritis Elevated Incidence and Risk of Emergent Cirrhosis Complications in Alcoholic Cirrhosis Compared with Other Etiologies Insights into the Characteristics and Functions of Mast Cells in the Gut Terlipressin for the Prevention and Treatment of Renal Decline in Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Drug Profile.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1