Policy challenges to enhance soil carbon sinks: the dirty part of making contributions to the Paris agreement by the United States

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Carbon Management Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1080/17583004.2023.2268071
Stephen M. Ogle, Richard T. Conant, Bart Fischer, Barbara K. Haya, Dale T. Manning, Bruce A. McCarl, Tamara Jane Zelikova
{"title":"Policy challenges to enhance soil carbon sinks: the dirty part of making contributions to the Paris agreement by the United States","authors":"Stephen M. Ogle, Richard T. Conant, Bart Fischer, Barbara K. Haya, Dale T. Manning, Bruce A. McCarl, Tamara Jane Zelikova","doi":"10.1080/17583004.2023.2268071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. government is planning significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions as part of their nationally determined contribution to the Paris Agreement. The plan includes a variety of activities, one of which is enhancing carbon sinks in soils through a climate-smart agriculture program. The nature of soil carbon along with market forces, cultural factors and other issues create challenges for a program in climate-smart agriculture. These challenges include quantification of soil carbon sequestration, targeting practice adoption that is additional to past adoption, and ensuring that emissions of other greenhouse gases do not increase with climate-smart practices. In addition, there are challenges associated with maintaining carbon storage in soils over a long-time horizon; and avoiding increases in greenhouse gas emissions on non-participating lands. We review and discuss options for addressing challenges with direct regulations, subsidies and tax incentives, carbon taxes, and carbon credit offsets. None of these policy interventions are likely to overcome all challenges, but there are ways to limit risks that challenges pose to each intervention. The ability of the U.S. government to limit or mitigate these risks through careful design of a climate-smart agriculture program will largely determine how much carbon is sequestered in soils, and associated contributions to their emissions reduction goal for the Paris Agreement.","PeriodicalId":48941,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2023.2268071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The U.S. government is planning significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions as part of their nationally determined contribution to the Paris Agreement. The plan includes a variety of activities, one of which is enhancing carbon sinks in soils through a climate-smart agriculture program. The nature of soil carbon along with market forces, cultural factors and other issues create challenges for a program in climate-smart agriculture. These challenges include quantification of soil carbon sequestration, targeting practice adoption that is additional to past adoption, and ensuring that emissions of other greenhouse gases do not increase with climate-smart practices. In addition, there are challenges associated with maintaining carbon storage in soils over a long-time horizon; and avoiding increases in greenhouse gas emissions on non-participating lands. We review and discuss options for addressing challenges with direct regulations, subsidies and tax incentives, carbon taxes, and carbon credit offsets. None of these policy interventions are likely to overcome all challenges, but there are ways to limit risks that challenges pose to each intervention. The ability of the U.S. government to limit or mitigate these risks through careful design of a climate-smart agriculture program will largely determine how much carbon is sequestered in soils, and associated contributions to their emissions reduction goal for the Paris Agreement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强土壤碳汇的政策挑战:美国对《巴黎协定》做出贡献的肮脏部分
美国政府计划大幅减少温室气体排放,作为对《巴黎协定》的国家自主贡献的一部分。该计划包括各种活动,其中之一是通过气候智能型农业项目加强土壤中的碳汇。土壤碳的性质以及市场力量、文化因素和其他问题给气候智能型农业项目带来了挑战。这些挑战包括土壤固碳量的量化,针对过去采用的额外做法的采用,以及确保其他温室气体的排放不会因气候智能型做法而增加。此外,长期保持土壤中的碳储量也存在挑战;避免在非参与土地上增加温室气体排放。我们审查并讨论了通过直接监管、补贴和税收激励、碳税和碳信用抵消来应对挑战的各种方案。这些政策干预都不可能克服所有的挑战,但有办法限制挑战给每项干预带来的风险。美国政府通过精心设计气候智慧型农业计划来限制或减轻这些风险的能力,将在很大程度上决定土壤中封存了多少碳,以及对《巴黎协定》减排目标的相关贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Carbon Management
Carbon Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Carbon Management is a scholarly peer-reviewed forum for insights from the diverse array of disciplines that enhance our understanding of carbon dioxide and other GHG interactions – from biology, ecology, chemistry and engineering to law, policy, economics and sociology. The core aim of Carbon Management is it to examine the options and mechanisms for mitigating the causes and impacts of climate change, which includes mechanisms for reducing emissions and enhancing the removal of GHGs from the atmosphere, as well as metrics used to measure performance of options and mechanisms resulting from international treaties, domestic policies, local regulations, environmental markets, technologies, industrial efforts and consumer choices. One key aim of the journal is to catalyse intellectual debate in an inclusive and scientific manner on the practical work of policy implementation related to the long-term effort of managing our global GHG emissions and impacts. Decisions made in the near future will have profound impacts on the global climate and biosphere. Carbon Management delivers research findings in an accessible format to inform decisions in the fields of research, education, management and environmental policy.
期刊最新文献
A commentary comparing the GHG Protocol and E-liability approaches to corporate GHG accounting and reporting Carbon reduction and nuclear energy policy U-turn: the necessity for an international treaty on small modular reactors (SMR) new nuclear technology Demystifying carbon removals in the context of offsetting for sub-global net-zero targets Is impact out of scope? A call for innovation in climate standards to inspire action across companies’ Spheres of Influence Urban embodied carbon assessment: methodology and insights from analyzing over a million buildings in Chicago
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1