A commentary comparing the GHG Protocol and E-liability approaches to corporate GHG accounting and reporting

IF 2.8 4区环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Carbon Management Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1080/17583004.2024.2397498

Janet Ranganathan

引用次数: 0

Abstract

E-liability is a GHG data management approach that has been proposed as an alternative to the GHG Protocol corporate standards, already widely adopted by businesses and voluntary and regulatory pro...

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

对企业温室气体核算和报告的温室气体议定书方法与电子负债方法进行比较的评述

电子责任是一种温室气体数据管理方法，已被提出作为《温室气体议定书》企业标准的替代方案。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Carbon Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-

CiteScore

5.80

自引率

3.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Carbon Management is a scholarly peer-reviewed forum for insights from the diverse array of disciplines that enhance our understanding of carbon dioxide and other GHG interactions – from biology, ecology, chemistry and engineering to law, policy, economics and sociology. The core aim of Carbon Management is it to examine the options and mechanisms for mitigating the causes and impacts of climate change, which includes mechanisms for reducing emissions and enhancing the removal of GHGs from the atmosphere, as well as metrics used to measure performance of options and mechanisms resulting from international treaties, domestic policies, local regulations, environmental markets, technologies, industrial efforts and consumer choices. One key aim of the journal is to catalyse intellectual debate in an inclusive and scientific manner on the practical work of policy implementation related to the long-term effort of managing our global GHG emissions and impacts. Decisions made in the near future will have profound impacts on the global climate and biosphere. Carbon Management delivers research findings in an accessible format to inform decisions in the fields of research, education, management and environmental policy.