Teacher profiles concerning upper secondary school teachers' views on and use of digital learning resources for teaching – a cluster analysis

IF 2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1080/00313831.2023.2262495
Lena Gleisner Villasmil, Jannika Lindvall, Louise Sund, Olcay Sert
{"title":"Teacher profiles concerning upper secondary school teachers' views on and use of digital learning resources for teaching – a cluster analysis","authors":"Lena Gleisner Villasmil, Jannika Lindvall, Louise Sund, Olcay Sert","doi":"10.1080/00313831.2023.2262495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to characterize upper secondary school teachers’ views on and use of digital learning resources (DLR) for teaching and explore whether there are differences between teachers’ profiles in relation to demographic aspects. The data was collected through an online survey from a sample of 243 teachers from 23 upper secondary schools in Sweden. The survey included questions on why and how teachers used DLR for teaching. The data was analysed using exploratory factor, cluster, and post hoc analyses. Five different teacher profiles were identified: high, high general, medium, medium general, and low DLR capacity. These profiles differed significantly concerning self-reported skills, use, and purposes of DLR. Moreover, the five profiles also differ significantly on demographic factors such as teacher degree. These findings have important implications for the design of in-service teacher training and pre-service teacher education programs concerning teachers’ skills, didactic purposes, and use of DLR.","PeriodicalId":47669,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2262495","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to characterize upper secondary school teachers’ views on and use of digital learning resources (DLR) for teaching and explore whether there are differences between teachers’ profiles in relation to demographic aspects. The data was collected through an online survey from a sample of 243 teachers from 23 upper secondary schools in Sweden. The survey included questions on why and how teachers used DLR for teaching. The data was analysed using exploratory factor, cluster, and post hoc analyses. Five different teacher profiles were identified: high, high general, medium, medium general, and low DLR capacity. These profiles differed significantly concerning self-reported skills, use, and purposes of DLR. Moreover, the five profiles also differ significantly on demographic factors such as teacher degree. These findings have important implications for the design of in-service teacher training and pre-service teacher education programs concerning teachers’ skills, didactic purposes, and use of DLR.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高中教师对数字化学习资源的看法和使用——聚类分析
本研究旨在探讨高中教师对数位学习资源(DLR)教学的看法和使用情况,并探讨教师在人口统计学方面是否存在差异。这些数据是通过对瑞典23所高中的243名教师的在线调查收集的。调查的问题包括教师为什么以及如何使用DLR进行教学。使用探索性因素、聚类和事后分析对数据进行分析。我们确定了五种不同的教师概况:高、高一般、中等、中等一般和低DLR能力。这些概况在自我报告的技能、使用和DLR目的方面存在显著差异。此外,在教师学历等人口统计学因素上,五种概况也存在显著差异。这些发现对于在职教师培训和职前教师教育项目的设计具有重要的启示意义,这些项目涉及教师技能、教学目的和DLR的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research
Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research is an international refereed research journal focusing on central ideas and themes in educational thinking and research. The journal welcomes reports on philosophical, historical, comparative, experimental and survey studies and has no preferences - except quality - concerning the authors" choices of methodological perspectives. The journal reflects ongoing educational research in the nordic countries. It also encourages scholarly discussions on vital concepts, new issues and themes of importance for education in the future.
期刊最新文献
Gifted students’ experiences with participation in enrichment programs at talent centers in Norway “We tend to underestimate the children!” – a qualitative analysis of preschool teachers’ views on child-parent-teacher relationship-building during preschool transition Life purposes of Finnish adolescents Anxious boys and girls under the teacher’s radar: Students’ perceptions of academic problems and help in compulsory school Sustainably on the seas of academia: comparing metaphors of social and independent academic writing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1