A model and simulation study of developers’ multicontract incentives for contractors’ green technology innovation decisions considering marketing efforts and innovation capability
{"title":"A model and simulation study of developers’ multicontract incentives for contractors’ green technology innovation decisions considering marketing efforts and innovation capability","authors":"Yingmiao Qian, Xian-an Yu, Xueli Chen, Malin Song","doi":"10.1177/0958305x231205022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To promote low-carbon development of the construction industry and popularize green buildings (GBs), considering the influence of marketing efforts and innovation capability on GB market demand, this paper constructs multiple incentive decision models based on contract theory, analyzes developers’ decision-making behaviors for incentivizing contractors’ green technology innovation (GTI) under different incentive decision models; and explores the impacts of greenness preference and service quality preference on contract prices, sales prices, innovation levels and marketing effort levels. In addition, the impacts of marketing effort cost coefficient and innovation capability on innovation levels, marketing effort levels and developers’ profits are simulated through parameter assignment and computer software. The results show that greenness preference and service quality preference have positive impacts on developers’ and contractors’ decisions and profits; under the decision model based on innovation level, the developers maximize profits, but the developers’ marketing effort levels and contractors’ innovation levels are lower at this time; under the decision model based on cost-sharing, the contractors have the highest innovation levels and achieve optimal profits, while the innovation capability can promote innovative activities. The results of the study have guiding significance for enhancing the levels of GTI and promoting the development of GBs.","PeriodicalId":11652,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environment","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x231205022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To promote low-carbon development of the construction industry and popularize green buildings (GBs), considering the influence of marketing efforts and innovation capability on GB market demand, this paper constructs multiple incentive decision models based on contract theory, analyzes developers’ decision-making behaviors for incentivizing contractors’ green technology innovation (GTI) under different incentive decision models; and explores the impacts of greenness preference and service quality preference on contract prices, sales prices, innovation levels and marketing effort levels. In addition, the impacts of marketing effort cost coefficient and innovation capability on innovation levels, marketing effort levels and developers’ profits are simulated through parameter assignment and computer software. The results show that greenness preference and service quality preference have positive impacts on developers’ and contractors’ decisions and profits; under the decision model based on innovation level, the developers maximize profits, but the developers’ marketing effort levels and contractors’ innovation levels are lower at this time; under the decision model based on cost-sharing, the contractors have the highest innovation levels and achieve optimal profits, while the innovation capability can promote innovative activities. The results of the study have guiding significance for enhancing the levels of GTI and promoting the development of GBs.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Environment is an interdisciplinary journal inviting energy policy analysts, natural scientists and engineers, as well as lawyers and economists to contribute to mutual understanding and learning, believing that better communication between experts will enhance the quality of policy, advance social well-being and help to reduce conflict. The journal encourages dialogue between the social sciences as energy demand and supply are observed and analysed with reference to politics of policy-making and implementation. The rapidly evolving social and environmental impacts of energy supply, transport, production and use at all levels require contribution from many disciplines if policy is to be effective. In particular E & E invite contributions from the study of policy delivery, ultimately more important than policy formation. The geopolitics of energy are also important, as are the impacts of environmental regulations and advancing technologies on national and local politics, and even global energy politics. Energy & Environment is a forum for constructive, professional information sharing, as well as debate across disciplines and professions, including the financial sector. Mathematical articles are outside the scope of Energy & Environment. The broader policy implications of submitted research should be addressed and environmental implications, not just emission quantities, be discussed with reference to scientific assumptions. This applies especially to technical papers based on arguments suggested by other disciplines, funding bodies or directly by policy-makers.