Unpacking the nature of critical thinking for educational purposes

IF 2.3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Research and Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1080/13803611.2023.2262447
Khagendra Raj Dhakal, Richard Watson Todd, Natjiree Jaturapitakkul
{"title":"Unpacking the nature of critical thinking for educational purposes","authors":"Khagendra Raj Dhakal, Richard Watson Todd, Natjiree Jaturapitakkul","doi":"10.1080/13803611.2023.2262447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTAlthough critical thinking has been widely accepted as an educational goal for decades, clear evidence for the development of students’ critical thinking is sparse. Critical thinking has been conceptualised as skill, knowledge, and disposition respectively in psychology, philosophy and critical theory, but which applies to education is unclear. In this paper, we argue that treating critical thinking as skill is most appropriate in education. However, there are still three competing theories of critical thinking as skill: as a single unitary skill, as a set of disparate sub-skills, and as a composite skill with several sub-skills. We evaluated the validity of these theories through conducting Rasch and correlation analyses on the results of 385 undergraduate students in Thailand on the Multi-Purpose Assessment of Critical Thinking (MPACT) test. The findings suggest that critical thinking is a composite skill with several sub-skills with implications for the teaching and testing of critical thinking.KEYWORDS: Critical thinkingtheoriestestRasch analysiseducation AcknowledgmentsWe would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to the undergraduate students from over ten universities in Thailand for participating in the MPACT Test. We appreciate the insights from university educators in Thailand, who provided invaluable feedback concerning the usability of the various segments of the MPACT test. We would also like to thank Duangjaichanok Pansa for help with the analyses.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationNotes on contributorsKhagendra Raj DhakalKhagendra Raj Dhakal is a Ph.D. candidate in applied linguistics at King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi. He has been teaching applied linguistics and general education courses at King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok for more than a decade as a lecturer. His interest areas include education policy, testing, critical thinking, and global competencies. Dhakal is also a member of National Council on Measurement in Education.Richard Watson ToddRichard Watson Todd is Associate Professor at King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi. He has a Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool. He is the author of numerous articles and several books, including Discourse Topics (John Benjamins, 2016). His research interests include text linguistics, corpus linguistics, and educational innovations.Natjiree JaturapitakkulNatjiree Jaturapitakkul, Ph.D. is an assistant professor at School of Liberal Arts, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi in Bangkok where she teaches English for undergraduates and graduates in the ELT program. She has published and presented papers on English language teaching and learning, language assessment, test development, and ESP testing.","PeriodicalId":47025,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research and Evaluation","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2023.2262447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTAlthough critical thinking has been widely accepted as an educational goal for decades, clear evidence for the development of students’ critical thinking is sparse. Critical thinking has been conceptualised as skill, knowledge, and disposition respectively in psychology, philosophy and critical theory, but which applies to education is unclear. In this paper, we argue that treating critical thinking as skill is most appropriate in education. However, there are still three competing theories of critical thinking as skill: as a single unitary skill, as a set of disparate sub-skills, and as a composite skill with several sub-skills. We evaluated the validity of these theories through conducting Rasch and correlation analyses on the results of 385 undergraduate students in Thailand on the Multi-Purpose Assessment of Critical Thinking (MPACT) test. The findings suggest that critical thinking is a composite skill with several sub-skills with implications for the teaching and testing of critical thinking.KEYWORDS: Critical thinkingtheoriestestRasch analysiseducation AcknowledgmentsWe would like to express our heartfelt gratitude to the undergraduate students from over ten universities in Thailand for participating in the MPACT Test. We appreciate the insights from university educators in Thailand, who provided invaluable feedback concerning the usability of the various segments of the MPACT test. We would also like to thank Duangjaichanok Pansa for help with the analyses.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationNotes on contributorsKhagendra Raj DhakalKhagendra Raj Dhakal is a Ph.D. candidate in applied linguistics at King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi. He has been teaching applied linguistics and general education courses at King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok for more than a decade as a lecturer. His interest areas include education policy, testing, critical thinking, and global competencies. Dhakal is also a member of National Council on Measurement in Education.Richard Watson ToddRichard Watson Todd is Associate Professor at King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi. He has a Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool. He is the author of numerous articles and several books, including Discourse Topics (John Benjamins, 2016). His research interests include text linguistics, corpus linguistics, and educational innovations.Natjiree JaturapitakkulNatjiree Jaturapitakkul, Ph.D. is an assistant professor at School of Liberal Arts, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi in Bangkok where she teaches English for undergraduates and graduates in the ELT program. She has published and presented papers on English language teaching and learning, language assessment, test development, and ESP testing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为教育目的揭开批判性思维的本质
尽管批判性思维作为一种教育目标已经被广泛接受了几十年,但关于培养学生批判性思维的明确证据却很少。在心理学、哲学和批判理论中,批判性思维分别被定义为技能、知识和性格,但是否适用于教育尚不清楚。在本文中,我们认为在教育中把批判性思维作为一种技能是最合适的。然而,关于批判性思维作为一种技能,仍然存在三种相互竞争的理论:作为一种单一的技能,作为一组不同的子技能,以及作为一种具有多个子技能的复合技能。我们通过对385名泰国本科生进行批判性思维多目的评估(MPACT)测试的结果进行Rasch和相关分析来评估这些理论的有效性。研究结果表明,批判性思维是一种复合技能,具有几个子技能,对批判性思维的教学和测试具有启示意义。关键词:批判性思维理论分析教育感谢来自泰国十多所大学的本科生参加MPACT考试,我们表示衷心的感谢。我们感谢泰国大学教育工作者的真知灼见,他们就MPACT考试各部分的可用性提供了宝贵的反馈。我们还要感谢Duangjaichanok Pansa在分析方面提供的帮助。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。作者简介:khagendra Raj Dhakal是蒙库特国王吞武里科技大学应用语言学博士研究生。他作为讲师在北曼谷蒙库特国王科技大学教授应用语言学和通识教育课程已有十多年。他的兴趣领域包括教育政策、考试、批判性思维和全球竞争力。Dhakal也是国家教育测量委员会的成员。理查德·沃森·托德(Richard Watson Todd)是吞武里蒙库特国王科技大学的副教授。他拥有利物浦大学的博士学位。他是许多文章和几本书的作者,包括Discourse Topics (John Benjamins, 2016)。主要研究方向为文本语言学、语料库语言学和教育创新。Natjiree Jaturapitakkul博士是曼谷吞武里蒙库特国王科技大学文科学院的助理教授,在那里她教授英语教学项目的本科生和研究生英语。她在英语教学、语言评估、测试开发和ESP测试方面发表和发表论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Research and Evaluation
Educational Research and Evaluation EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: International, comparative and multidisciplinary in scope, Educational Research and Evaluation (ERE) publishes original, peer-reviewed academic articles dealing with research on issues of worldwide relevance in educational practice. The aim of the journal is to increase understanding of learning in pre-primary, primary, high school, college, university and adult education, and to contribute to the improvement of educational processes and outcomes. The journal seeks to promote cross-national and international comparative educational research by publishing findings relevant to the scholarly community, as well as to practitioners and others interested in education. The scope of the journal is deliberately broad in terms of both topics covered and disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Teachers’ effects on student achievement in the United States from a cumulative perspective The impact of self-efficacy and self-regulated learning strategies on students’ achievements in STEM disciplines Distributed leadership, self-awareness, democracy, and sustainable development: towards an integrative model of school effectiveness Does formal teacher competence matter for students’ mathematics achievement? Results from Swedish TIMSS 2019 Case study of the use of learner-centered assessment in the math school of a large university in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1