Evisceration with primary orbital implant in endophthalmitis/ panophthalmitis

Syeed Mehbub Ul Kadir, Mohammad Abid Akbar, Shah Muhammad Aman Ullah, Md. Amiruzzaman, Narayon Chandra Bhowmik, Rajendra Prakash Maurya, Md. Golam Haider
{"title":"Evisceration with primary orbital implant in endophthalmitis/ panophthalmitis","authors":"Syeed Mehbub Ul Kadir, Mohammad Abid Akbar, Shah Muhammad Aman Ullah, Md. Amiruzzaman, Narayon Chandra Bhowmik, Rajendra Prakash Maurya, Md. Golam Haider","doi":"10.18231/j.ijooo.2023.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To describe the outcome of Evisceration with the primary orbital implant in non-seeing eyes with and without ocular infection (endophthalmitis/panophthalmitis). A prospective, nonrandomized comparative case series research was performed from 2019 to 2022. Patients with the least postoperative follow-up of 6 months were included in the study. One seventy-three eyes of one seventy-three patients were included. Group A involved the infective patients, and Group B included all noninfective blind eyes. Nonporous PMMA implants were used for all cases, and the main outcome measure was the successful retention of the primary implant. All types of complications and satisfactory prosthesis fitting were also observed. The mean (±SD) age was 45.689 ± 11.34 years, with males (53.2%) predominant. All except 11 cases could retain the primary implant successfully. Primary orbital implants were exposed in nine (5.2%) cases (four in Group A and five in Group B), and Extrusion of the primary orbital implant occurred in two (1.1%) cases, and all extrusion occurred in Group A. One hundred fifty-six (90.2%) patients underwent successful prosthesis fitting with better cosmesis. The difference in major complications like implant exposure and implant extrusion between the groups was not statistically significant (P value equals 0.0879, Fisher exact test). Evisceration with a primary orbital implant is feasible in both infective (endophthalmitis/ panophthalmitis) and noninfective blind eyes. It provides a better postoperative cosmesis to the anophthalmic socket.","PeriodicalId":14485,"journal":{"name":"IP International Journal of Ocular Oncology and Oculoplasty","volume":"19 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP International Journal of Ocular Oncology and Oculoplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijooo.2023.028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To describe the outcome of Evisceration with the primary orbital implant in non-seeing eyes with and without ocular infection (endophthalmitis/panophthalmitis). A prospective, nonrandomized comparative case series research was performed from 2019 to 2022. Patients with the least postoperative follow-up of 6 months were included in the study. One seventy-three eyes of one seventy-three patients were included. Group A involved the infective patients, and Group B included all noninfective blind eyes. Nonporous PMMA implants were used for all cases, and the main outcome measure was the successful retention of the primary implant. All types of complications and satisfactory prosthesis fitting were also observed. The mean (±SD) age was 45.689 ± 11.34 years, with males (53.2%) predominant. All except 11 cases could retain the primary implant successfully. Primary orbital implants were exposed in nine (5.2%) cases (four in Group A and five in Group B), and Extrusion of the primary orbital implant occurred in two (1.1%) cases, and all extrusion occurred in Group A. One hundred fifty-six (90.2%) patients underwent successful prosthesis fitting with better cosmesis. The difference in major complications like implant exposure and implant extrusion between the groups was not statistically significant (P value equals 0.0879, Fisher exact test). Evisceration with a primary orbital implant is feasible in both infective (endophthalmitis/ panophthalmitis) and noninfective blind eyes. It provides a better postoperative cosmesis to the anophthalmic socket.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼内炎/全眼炎伴原发性眼眶植入物剜出
目的:探讨有无眼内感染(眼内炎/眼全炎)的无视力眼内剜出合并初级眼窝植入物的结果。在2019年至2022年期间进行了前瞻性、非随机比较病例系列研究。术后随访时间最少6个月的患者纳入研究。纳入了73名患者的73只眼睛。A组为感染性患者,B组为所有非感染性盲眼。所有病例均使用无孔PMMA种植体,主要观察指标是原生种植体的成功固位。所有并发症及假体安装均满意。平均(±SD)年龄为45.689±11.34岁,男性占53.2%。除11例外,其余均能成功保留原植体。A组4例(5.2%),B组5例(5.2%),A组2例(1.1%),全部为A组(90.2%),56例(90.2%)患者假体安装成功,美观性较好。种植体暴露、种植体挤压等主要并发症组间差异无统计学意义(P值= 0.0879,Fisher精确检验)。在感染性(眼内炎/全眼炎)和非感染性失明的眼睛中,原发性眼窝植入术是可行的。它提供了一个更好的术后美容无眼窝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Scleral contact lens for severe keratoconus with corneal hydrops: A case report A systematic review on prosthodontic rehabilitation of hemimandibulectomy patients Visual outcome of cataract surgery in paediatric uveitis Intraoperative partial thickness compression suturing for descemet’s membrane detachment: A Novel technique Does addition of intravitreal bevacizumab confer additional benefit in management of proliferative diabetic retinopathy?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1