{"title":"Sporazum Zulfikarpašić-Milošević 1991. godine","authors":"Hamza Memišević","doi":"10.52259/historijskipogledi.2023.6.10.209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historical Background and the Emergence of New Bibliographic Units in the Context of the Contemporary Political Moment Demand a Reevaluation of Previous Interpretations Related to Events in the Territory of the Former Socialist Yugoslavia. This paper focuses on the Historical Agreement, also known as the Zulfikarpašić-Milošević Agreement, initiated by Muslims (Bosniaks). The agreement was intended as a peace and political initiative but came late in the context of the war in Croatia and the policy of regionalization pursued by the Serbian side in Bosnia and Herzegovina. After leaving the Party of Democratic Action (SDA), Adil Zulfikarpašić founded the Muslim Bosniak Organization (MBO), with the support of academician Muhamed Filipović. Dissatisfied with the policies of the SDA, Zulfikarpašić and Filipović sought to address the crisis through a different approach. In the case of the MBO, this approach involved historical reconciliation with the Serbs. While the leaders of the MBO structured this agreement as a peace and political initiative, its implementation was not possible due to the opposing state-legal concepts from the Bosniak (Muslim) side. The concept of a union of free states, central to the MBO's agreement, did not receive support from the Serbian side. In such a constellation of relationships, Yugoslavia could continue to function only as a federal state, as it best served Serbian state interests. The fundamental aim of this work is to shed light on the events preceding the agreement, what the agreement entailed, and why it ultimately failed. The introductory section of the paper analyzes Muslim (Bosniak)-Serbian historical reconciliation, which includes the period of Austro-Hungarian rule and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia when certain Muslim (Bosniak) politicians formed a specific type of alliance with the Serbs. The position of Muslims (Bosniaks) in the early 1990s significantly differed from that at the beginning of the 20th century. The paper dedicates a substantial portion of its pages to significant events in the Second Yugoslavia to provide a comprehensive synthesis. The 1974 Constitution, the Memorandum of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (SANU), the rise of Milošević, the abolition of autonomy for provinces in Serbia, and the republic-level elections were all events that preceded the agreement. Special attention in the paper is given to the participants of the agreement as significant political protagonists of that period, as well as the political parties whose members were part of the agreement and the architects of the policies of that era. Adil beg Zulfikarpašić undeniably played a central role in the efforts to reach a historical agreement between Muslims (Bosniaks) and Serbs. After World War II, Zulfikarpašić went into exile, where he launched the Bosanski pogledi magazine in the early 1960s. During his time in exile, he operated from various political-ideological positions, later emerging as one of the ideologues of Bosniak identity. In 1963, Zulfikarpašić participated in the founding of the Democratic Alternative, a movement in which Bosniak, Croatian, Serbian, and Slovenian intellectuals advocated for the democratization of Yugoslavia and the concept of free states within Yugoslavia. The foundation of this movement was a departure from Yugoslavia, i.e., communism, and alignment with the Western bloc of countries that based their policies on the principles of capitalism and democracy. Zulfikarpašić remained unwaveringly convinced of the correctness of the political initiative for reconciliation with the Serbs, considering the agreement the best solution under the circumstances and the only alternative to the impending war. A. Zulfikarpašić, as the main architect of the agreement, left Bosnia and Herzegovina in September 1991, and shortly thereafter, his party colleague, academician Muhamed Filipović, terminated all processes related to the agreement.","PeriodicalId":52780,"journal":{"name":"Historijski pogledi","volume":"2 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historijski pogledi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52259/historijskipogledi.2023.6.10.209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Historical Background and the Emergence of New Bibliographic Units in the Context of the Contemporary Political Moment Demand a Reevaluation of Previous Interpretations Related to Events in the Territory of the Former Socialist Yugoslavia. This paper focuses on the Historical Agreement, also known as the Zulfikarpašić-Milošević Agreement, initiated by Muslims (Bosniaks). The agreement was intended as a peace and political initiative but came late in the context of the war in Croatia and the policy of regionalization pursued by the Serbian side in Bosnia and Herzegovina. After leaving the Party of Democratic Action (SDA), Adil Zulfikarpašić founded the Muslim Bosniak Organization (MBO), with the support of academician Muhamed Filipović. Dissatisfied with the policies of the SDA, Zulfikarpašić and Filipović sought to address the crisis through a different approach. In the case of the MBO, this approach involved historical reconciliation with the Serbs. While the leaders of the MBO structured this agreement as a peace and political initiative, its implementation was not possible due to the opposing state-legal concepts from the Bosniak (Muslim) side. The concept of a union of free states, central to the MBO's agreement, did not receive support from the Serbian side. In such a constellation of relationships, Yugoslavia could continue to function only as a federal state, as it best served Serbian state interests. The fundamental aim of this work is to shed light on the events preceding the agreement, what the agreement entailed, and why it ultimately failed. The introductory section of the paper analyzes Muslim (Bosniak)-Serbian historical reconciliation, which includes the period of Austro-Hungarian rule and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia when certain Muslim (Bosniak) politicians formed a specific type of alliance with the Serbs. The position of Muslims (Bosniaks) in the early 1990s significantly differed from that at the beginning of the 20th century. The paper dedicates a substantial portion of its pages to significant events in the Second Yugoslavia to provide a comprehensive synthesis. The 1974 Constitution, the Memorandum of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (SANU), the rise of Milošević, the abolition of autonomy for provinces in Serbia, and the republic-level elections were all events that preceded the agreement. Special attention in the paper is given to the participants of the agreement as significant political protagonists of that period, as well as the political parties whose members were part of the agreement and the architects of the policies of that era. Adil beg Zulfikarpašić undeniably played a central role in the efforts to reach a historical agreement between Muslims (Bosniaks) and Serbs. After World War II, Zulfikarpašić went into exile, where he launched the Bosanski pogledi magazine in the early 1960s. During his time in exile, he operated from various political-ideological positions, later emerging as one of the ideologues of Bosniak identity. In 1963, Zulfikarpašić participated in the founding of the Democratic Alternative, a movement in which Bosniak, Croatian, Serbian, and Slovenian intellectuals advocated for the democratization of Yugoslavia and the concept of free states within Yugoslavia. The foundation of this movement was a departure from Yugoslavia, i.e., communism, and alignment with the Western bloc of countries that based their policies on the principles of capitalism and democracy. Zulfikarpašić remained unwaveringly convinced of the correctness of the political initiative for reconciliation with the Serbs, considering the agreement the best solution under the circumstances and the only alternative to the impending war. A. Zulfikarpašić, as the main architect of the agreement, left Bosnia and Herzegovina in September 1991, and shortly thereafter, his party colleague, academician Muhamed Filipović, terminated all processes related to the agreement.
当代政治语境下的历史背景与新书目单元的出现,要求我们重新审视以往对前社会主义南斯拉夫境内事件的解释。本文的重点是穆斯林(波斯尼亚人)发起的历史协议,也被称为Zulfikarpašić-Milošević协议。该协定的目的是作为一项和平与政治倡议,但由于克罗地亚境内的战争和塞尔维亚一方在波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那实行区域化政策,该协定姗姗来迟。离开民主行动党(SDA)后,阿迪尔Zulfikarpašić在院士穆罕默德·菲利波维奇的支持下成立了穆斯林波斯尼亚组织(MBO)。Zulfikarpašić和菲利波维奇对SDA的政策不满,试图通过一种不同的方法来解决危机。就MBO而言,这种做法涉及与塞尔维亚人的历史性和解。虽然MBO领导人将这项协议作为一项和平与政治倡议,但由于波斯尼亚(穆斯林)一方反对国家法律概念,该协议无法实施。作为MBO协议核心的自由国家联盟的概念没有得到塞尔维亚方面的支持。在这种关系中,南斯拉夫只能继续作为一个联邦国家发挥作用,因为它最符合塞尔维亚国家的利益。这项工作的基本目的是阐明协议之前的事件,协议的内容,以及它最终失败的原因。本文的引言部分分析了穆斯林(波什尼亚克人)与塞尔维亚人的历史和解,其中包括奥匈帝国统治和南斯拉夫王国时期,当时某些穆斯林(波什尼亚克人)政治家与塞尔维亚人形成了一种特定类型的联盟。穆斯林(波斯尼亚人)在20世纪90年代初的地位与20世纪初的地位明显不同。该文件用大量篇幅介绍了第二南斯拉夫的重大事件,以提供一个全面的综合。1974年的宪法,塞尔维亚科学和艺术学院(SANU)的备忘录,Milošević的兴起,塞尔维亚各省自治权的废除,以及共和国级别的选举都是在协议之前发生的事件。本文特别注意作为该时期重要政治主角的协定的参与者,以及其成员是该协定的一部分的政党和该时代政策的设计者。adl beg Zulfikarpašić无可否认地在穆斯林(波斯尼亚人)和塞尔维亚人之间达成历史性协议的努力中发挥了核心作用。第二次世界大战后,Zulfikarpašić流亡海外,并于20世纪60年代初创办了《博桑斯基》杂志。在流亡期间,他从不同的政治意识形态立场出发,后来成为波斯尼亚身份的理论家之一。1963年,Zulfikarpašić参与了民主选择运动的创立,这是一个由波斯尼亚、克罗地亚、塞尔维亚和斯洛文尼亚的知识分子倡导南斯拉夫民主化和南斯拉夫内部自由国家概念的运动。这场运动的基础是脱离南斯拉夫,即共产主义,并与以资本主义和民主原则为政策基础的西方国家集团结盟。Zulfikarpašić仍然毫不动摇地相信与塞尔维亚人和解的政治倡议是正确的,认为该协定是目前情况下的最佳解决办法和即将到来的战争的唯一替代办法。A. Zulfikarpašić作为该协定的主要设计者于1991年9月离开波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那,此后不久,他的党内同事穆罕默德·菲利波维奇院士终止了与该协定有关的所有进程。