Revisiting the hysteresis hypothesis: an ARIMAX approach

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Review of Keynesian Economics Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI:10.4337/roke.2023.04.03
Robert Calvert Jump, Engelbert Stockhammer
{"title":"Revisiting the hysteresis hypothesis: an ARIMAX approach","authors":"Robert Calvert Jump, Engelbert Stockhammer","doi":"10.4337/roke.2023.04.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2008 financial crisis saw a resurgence of interest in the hysteresis hypothesis, which was subsequently reflected in policy responses to the COVID-19 and cost-of-living crises. In this paper, we present new evidence in favour of the hysteresis hypothesis for Germany, France, and the United Kingdom, using a dataset that spans from 1960 to 2019. Our model is based on the popular unobserved components approach to estimating the degree of hysteresis, which is generalised to permit a reduced form Phillips curve that takes the form of an ARIMAX model. Our results are robust to ARCH effects and varying the sample span. They support contemporary warnings of the risk of scarring effects following the COVID-19 crisis, long-standing Post-Keynesian models of hysteresis, and the recent resurgence of mainstream interest in hysteresis.","PeriodicalId":45671,"journal":{"name":"Review of Keynesian Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Keynesian Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2023.04.03","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2008 financial crisis saw a resurgence of interest in the hysteresis hypothesis, which was subsequently reflected in policy responses to the COVID-19 and cost-of-living crises. In this paper, we present new evidence in favour of the hysteresis hypothesis for Germany, France, and the United Kingdom, using a dataset that spans from 1960 to 2019. Our model is based on the popular unobserved components approach to estimating the degree of hysteresis, which is generalised to permit a reduced form Phillips curve that takes the form of an ARIMAX model. Our results are robust to ARCH effects and varying the sample span. They support contemporary warnings of the risk of scarring effects following the COVID-19 crisis, long-standing Post-Keynesian models of hysteresis, and the recent resurgence of mainstream interest in hysteresis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾迟滞假说:ARIMAX方法
2008年金融危机使人们对滞后假说重新产生了兴趣,这随后反映在应对COVID-19和生活成本危机的政策中。在本文中,我们使用1960年至2019年的数据集,为德国、法国和英国提供了支持滞后假说的新证据。我们的模型基于估计滞后程度的流行的未观察分量方法,该方法被推广到允许采用ARIMAX模型形式的简化形式菲利普斯曲线。我们的结果对ARCH效应和变化的样本跨度具有鲁棒性。他们支持当前关于新冠肺炎危机后疤痕效应风险的警告、长期存在的后凯恩斯滞后模型,以及最近主流对滞后的兴趣重新抬头。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Review of Keynesian Economics (ROKE) is dedicated to the promotion of research in Keynesian economics. Not only does that include Keynesian ideas about macroeconomic theory and policy, it also extends to microeconomic and meso-economic analysis and relevant empirical and historical research. The journal provides a forum for developing and disseminating Keynesian ideas, and intends to encourage critical exchange with other macroeconomic paradigms. The journal is dedicated to the development of Keynesian theory and policy. In our view, Keynesian theory should hold a similar place in economics to that held by the theory of evolution in biology. Many individual economists still work within the Keynesian paradigm, but intellectual success demands institutional support that can leverage those individual efforts. The journal offers such support by providing a forum for developing and sharing Keynesian ideas. Not only does that include ideas about macroeconomic theory and policy, it also extends to microeconomic and meso-economic analysis and relevant empirical and historical research. We see a bright future for the Keynesian approach to macroeconomics and invite the economics profession to join us by subscribing to the journal and submitting manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Alternative uses of functional finance: Lerner, MMT, and the Sraffian supermultiplier Book review: Imad Moosa, Fintech: A Revolution or a Transitory Hype? (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA 2022, hardcover, ISBN 978-1-80220-633-3, US$117) 227 pp. Rethinking the balance-of-payments-constrained approach, in the light of the recent commodity boom The limits to redistribution in small open economies: the case of Argentina Book review: John Komlos, Foundations of Real-World Economics: What Every Student Needs to Know, Third Edition (Routledge, New York, NY, USA 2023, softcover, ISBN 9781032001722, US$54.95; hardcover, US$160; ebook, US$49.95) 420 pp.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1