The FINDING-Food Intervention: A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study Addressing Food Insecurity

Challenges Pub Date : 2023-10-28 DOI:10.3390/challe14040043
Michael F. Royer, Christopher Wharton
{"title":"The FINDING-Food Intervention: A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study Addressing Food Insecurity","authors":"Michael F. Royer, Christopher Wharton","doi":"10.3390/challe14040043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Food insecurity is an economic and social condition involving limited or uncertain access to food. The problem of food insecurity in communities is influenced by economic conditions, food deserts, and barriers to accessing healthy food. Individuals experiencing food insecurity often endure concurrent problems of financial instability, hunger, and poor mental and physical health. Public and non-profit services in the U.S., such as the federally supported Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and community food banks, provide food-related assistance to individuals who are at a high risk of experiencing food insecurity. Unfortunately, many individuals who qualify for these services still experience food insecurity due to barriers preventing them from accessing food. Effective approaches for removing barriers that prevent individuals from accessing food are needed to mitigate the increased risk of chronic disease among vulnerable populations. This study tested a novel food insecurity intervention called FINDING-Food, which stands for Frequent Informational Nudges Directing Individuals to Needed Goods. Informational nudges were used to promote food security through the removal of information barriers to accessing food. The intervention used in this mixed-methods feasibility study consisted of informational nudges in the form of weekly text messages that were sent to food pantry clients experiencing food insecurity (n = 24). The study aims were to test the efficacy and acceptability of the intervention by examining whether the informational nudges could enhance food pantry utilization, increase SNAP registration, and promote food security. Quantitative study results showed a lower prevalence of food insecurity in the intervention group than the control group at the end of the study. Qualitative findings revealed how intervention group participants who completed the study (n = 9) found the text messages to be helpful and informative. These study findings can enhance future food insecurity interventions aiming to eliminate barriers that prevent individuals who are food insecure from accessing healthy food.","PeriodicalId":91008,"journal":{"name":"Challenges","volume":"34 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/challe14040043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food insecurity is an economic and social condition involving limited or uncertain access to food. The problem of food insecurity in communities is influenced by economic conditions, food deserts, and barriers to accessing healthy food. Individuals experiencing food insecurity often endure concurrent problems of financial instability, hunger, and poor mental and physical health. Public and non-profit services in the U.S., such as the federally supported Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and community food banks, provide food-related assistance to individuals who are at a high risk of experiencing food insecurity. Unfortunately, many individuals who qualify for these services still experience food insecurity due to barriers preventing them from accessing food. Effective approaches for removing barriers that prevent individuals from accessing food are needed to mitigate the increased risk of chronic disease among vulnerable populations. This study tested a novel food insecurity intervention called FINDING-Food, which stands for Frequent Informational Nudges Directing Individuals to Needed Goods. Informational nudges were used to promote food security through the removal of information barriers to accessing food. The intervention used in this mixed-methods feasibility study consisted of informational nudges in the form of weekly text messages that were sent to food pantry clients experiencing food insecurity (n = 24). The study aims were to test the efficacy and acceptability of the intervention by examining whether the informational nudges could enhance food pantry utilization, increase SNAP registration, and promote food security. Quantitative study results showed a lower prevalence of food insecurity in the intervention group than the control group at the end of the study. Qualitative findings revealed how intervention group participants who completed the study (n = 9) found the text messages to be helpful and informative. These study findings can enhance future food insecurity interventions aiming to eliminate barriers that prevent individuals who are food insecure from accessing healthy food.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食物干预:一项解决食物不安全问题的混合方法可行性研究
粮食不安全是一种经济和社会状况,涉及获得粮食的机会有限或不确定。社区粮食不安全问题受到经济条件、食物沙漠和获取健康食品障碍的影响。经历粮食不安全的个人往往同时面临经济不稳定、饥饿和身心健康状况不佳的问题。美国的公共和非营利服务,如联邦政府支持的补充营养援助计划(SNAP)和社区食品银行,向面临粮食不安全高风险的个人提供与粮食有关的援助。不幸的是,许多有资格获得这些服务的人仍然面临粮食不安全,因为他们无法获得粮食。需要采取有效办法,消除阻碍个人获得食物的障碍,以减轻弱势群体中日益增加的慢性病风险。这项研究测试了一种名为“寻找食物”(FINDING-Food)的新型食品不安全干预措施,它的意思是“频繁的信息提示”,引导人们找到所需的商品。通过消除获取粮食的信息障碍,利用信息推动促进粮食安全。在这项混合方法可行性研究中使用的干预措施包括以每周短信的形式向经历食品不安全的食品储藏室客户发送信息推动(n = 24)。研究的目的是通过检查信息推送是否可以提高食品储藏室的利用率,增加SNAP注册,促进食品安全,来检验干预的有效性和可接受性。定量研究结果显示,在研究结束时,干预组的粮食不安全发生率低于对照组。定性研究结果揭示了完成研究的干预组参与者(n = 9)是如何发现短信的帮助和信息丰富的。这些研究结果可以加强未来的粮食不安全干预措施,旨在消除阻碍粮食不安全个人获得健康食品的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Safe Space for Dialogue—A Practice for Connected Consciousness and Compassion From Life-Skills Research and Training to Sustainability: A Case Study from a Spanish University Supporting Ageing Populations in Developing Countries: A Comparative Analysis of Pension Schemes and Policy Insights A New Vision for Challenges: A Transdisciplinary Journal Promoting Planetary Health and Flourishing for All Unlocking the Transformative Potential of Outdoor Office Work—A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1