God and the Jab: Religion is Associated With COVID-19 Vaccinations Rates in England

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Basic and Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI:10.1080/01973533.2023.2275064
Jason P. Martens
{"title":"God and the Jab: Religion is Associated With COVID-19 Vaccinations Rates in England","authors":"Jason P. Martens","doi":"10.1080/01973533.2023.2275064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractReligious areas were predicted to be negatively associated with COVID-19 vaccinations. Using public data on religion and vaccination rates within local authorities in England, support for the hypothesis was found. All major religious groups within England (i.e., Christianity, Buddhist, Hindu, Jewish, Muslim, Sikh, and “other” religious groups) were negatively associated with COVID-19 vaccination rates. Effects were stronger for Muslim and Christian areas than areas with other religious groups. Effects were not due to wealth, household size, mobility, or age. These results suggest that religious regions in general and regions with Muslims and Christians in particular are negatively associated with COVID-19 vaccination rates. These findings can be used as a guide for future research and to help inform vaccination efforts. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data accessibility statementAll data are freely available through their original sources (see references).","PeriodicalId":48014,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Applied Social Psychology","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2023.2275064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractReligious areas were predicted to be negatively associated with COVID-19 vaccinations. Using public data on religion and vaccination rates within local authorities in England, support for the hypothesis was found. All major religious groups within England (i.e., Christianity, Buddhist, Hindu, Jewish, Muslim, Sikh, and “other” religious groups) were negatively associated with COVID-19 vaccination rates. Effects were stronger for Muslim and Christian areas than areas with other religious groups. Effects were not due to wealth, household size, mobility, or age. These results suggest that religious regions in general and regions with Muslims and Christians in particular are negatively associated with COVID-19 vaccination rates. These findings can be used as a guide for future research and to help inform vaccination efforts. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data accessibility statementAll data are freely available through their original sources (see references).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上帝和疫苗:宗教与英格兰COVID-19疫苗接种率有关
宗教地区与COVID-19疫苗接种呈负相关。通过使用英格兰地方当局的宗教和疫苗接种率的公共数据,发现了对这一假设的支持。英格兰境内所有主要宗教团体(即基督教、佛教、印度教、犹太教、穆斯林、锡克教徒和“其他”宗教团体)与COVID-19疫苗接种率呈负相关。与其他宗教团体相比,穆斯林和基督教地区的影响更大。这些影响与财富、家庭规模、流动性或年龄无关。这些结果表明,一般宗教地区,特别是穆斯林和基督徒地区,与COVID-19疫苗接种率呈负相关。这些发现可以作为未来研究的指南,并有助于为疫苗接种工作提供信息。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可访问性声明所有数据均可通过其原始来源免费获取(参见参考文献)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Basic and Applied Social Psychology (BASP) emphasizes the publication of outstanding research articles, but also considers literature reviews, criticism, and methodological or theoretical statements spanning the entire range of social psychological issues. The journal will publish basic work in areas of social psychology that can be applied to societal problems, as well as direct application of social psychology to such problems. The journal provides a venue for a broad range of specialty areas, including research on legal and political issues, environmental influences on behavior, organizations, aging, medical and health-related outcomes, sexuality, education and learning, the effects of mass media, gender issues, and population problems.
期刊最新文献
Mindsets at Work: Understanding the Positive Impact of Growth Mindsets on Workplace Coaching Understanding the Relationship Between Just World Belief and Career Success: The Role of Work Engagement A Cognitive Toolbox for Persuasion. Perceived Diagnosticity and Persuasibility Bias of Persuasive Features The Changing Moral Environment—A Three-Wave Study Testing Four Moral Theories and the Fear of COVID-19 in Predicting Compliance with Behavioral Guidelines on COVID-19, Moralization Toward Non-Compliance, and Vaccination Outperforming in the Workplace: Predicting Employee Sensitivity About Being the Target of a Threatening Upward Comparison
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1