Overcoming Theological Dilemmas: Fostering Religious Moderation through the Resolution of Faith and Rationality

Gustiana Isya Marjani
{"title":"Overcoming Theological Dilemmas: Fostering Religious Moderation through the Resolution of Faith and Rationality","authors":"Gustiana Isya Marjani","doi":"10.15575/rjsalb.v7i2.28311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to explore pertinent philosophical approaches in order to analyze the primary dilemma associated with theological beliefs, which impede the efficacy of religious moderation within the Indonesian context. Consequently, the study endeavors to fortify the framework of religious moderation policies. By anchoring arguments and research within this philosophical paradigm, the author endeavors to establish a robust theoretical underpinning that substantiates the integration of faith and reason in the realm of religious moderation. The chosen methodology for this research comprises a comprehensive literature review, entailing the systematic gathering and analysis of diverse primary and secondary sources. Primary sources encompass relevant scholarly writings that directly address the subject of religious moderation, while secondary sources encompass a compendium of academic works, including books, journals, articles, and papers that specifically delve into the intricacies of this subject matter. The findings of this study demonstrate that the practice of religious moderation is frequently impeded by the exclusivity inherent in theological truths, which undermines the rationality of human actions. Therefore, a resolution between faith and reason is imperative to surmount this quandary, particularly through the facilitation and engagement in interfaith dialogues, the promotion of inclusive theological education, the cultivation of critical and rational thinking, the accentuation of universal moral values and religious virtues, the deepening of hermeneutics and moderation in interpretations, the distancing from identity politics, the spotlighting of spiritual experiences in religious praxis, and the emphasis on the fundamental right to freedom of religion.","PeriodicalId":32045,"journal":{"name":"Religious Jurnal Studi AgamaAgama dan Lintas Budaya","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religious Jurnal Studi AgamaAgama dan Lintas Budaya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15575/rjsalb.v7i2.28311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to explore pertinent philosophical approaches in order to analyze the primary dilemma associated with theological beliefs, which impede the efficacy of religious moderation within the Indonesian context. Consequently, the study endeavors to fortify the framework of religious moderation policies. By anchoring arguments and research within this philosophical paradigm, the author endeavors to establish a robust theoretical underpinning that substantiates the integration of faith and reason in the realm of religious moderation. The chosen methodology for this research comprises a comprehensive literature review, entailing the systematic gathering and analysis of diverse primary and secondary sources. Primary sources encompass relevant scholarly writings that directly address the subject of religious moderation, while secondary sources encompass a compendium of academic works, including books, journals, articles, and papers that specifically delve into the intricacies of this subject matter. The findings of this study demonstrate that the practice of religious moderation is frequently impeded by the exclusivity inherent in theological truths, which undermines the rationality of human actions. Therefore, a resolution between faith and reason is imperative to surmount this quandary, particularly through the facilitation and engagement in interfaith dialogues, the promotion of inclusive theological education, the cultivation of critical and rational thinking, the accentuation of universal moral values and religious virtues, the deepening of hermeneutics and moderation in interpretations, the distancing from identity politics, the spotlighting of spiritual experiences in religious praxis, and the emphasis on the fundamental right to freedom of religion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克服神学困境:通过信仰与理性的解决培养宗教节制
本研究旨在探讨相关的哲学方法,以分析与神学信仰相关的主要困境,这些困境阻碍了印度尼西亚背景下宗教节制的功效。因此,本研究试图强化宗教节制政策的框架。通过在这一哲学范式中锚定论点和研究,作者努力建立一个强有力的理论基础,以证实宗教节制领域中信仰与理性的整合。本研究选择的方法包括全面的文献综述,包括系统地收集和分析各种主要和次要来源。第一手资料包括直接涉及宗教节制主题的相关学术著作,而第二手资料包括学术著作的概要,包括书籍,期刊,文章和论文,专门研究这一主题的复杂性。本研究的结果表明,宗教节制的实践经常受到神学真理固有的排他性的阻碍,这破坏了人类行为的合理性。因此,必须解决信仰与理性之间的问题,以克服这一困境,特别是通过促进和参与不同信仰间的对话,促进包容性神学教育,培养批判性和理性思维,强调普遍的道德价值观和宗教美德,深化解释学和解释中的节制,远离身份政治,在宗教实践中强调精神体验,强调宗教自由的基本权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evolution of Sacred Traditions: The Inclusive Transformation of the Besale Ritual among the Suku Anak Dalam, Indonesia Overcoming Theological Dilemmas: Fostering Religious Moderation through the Resolution of Faith and Rationality Conservative Turn and Islamic Populism: Challenges Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama in Contemporary Politics The Inequality of Zakat Distribution to the Indonesia’s Impoverished Muslim Urban Chakras in the Boardroom: Integrating Ancient Wisdom with Modern Business Practices for Enhanced Emotional and Spiritual Intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1