Partnerships between public and private sectors in Brazil: towards efficiency?

Q3 Social Sciences Redes Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.18316/redes.v11i2.9299
Thiago Henrique Costa Silva, João da Cruz Gonçalves Neto
{"title":"Partnerships between public and private sectors in Brazil: towards efficiency?","authors":"Thiago Henrique Costa Silva, João da Cruz Gonçalves Neto","doi":"10.18316/redes.v11i2.9299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was developed to understand the role played by partnerships between public and private sectors in Brazil, especially with regard to increasing efficiency in the provision of public services. Through the use of historical and dialectical methods, anchored in bibliographic and documentary research, alongside indirect data analysis, we discuss the arguments in favor of and against the use of such partnerships within the Brazilian destatization program, as an instrument to promote the rights of the collectivity. After drawing a historical line of the construction of the third way, in which partnerships arise, and debating the fundamentals of state subsidiarity, it appears that there is a mystification of state inefficiency and market superiority. Furthermore, although the number of initiatives and signed contracts has increased over the years and has been encouraged by the government, partnerships are still ineffective in practice. Partnerships, so-called innovative arrangements, are focused on old (neo) liberal practices, moving society away from public decision-making processes and weakening rights on behalf of profit, consisting in a form of transfer of capital from the State to small private groups. Sometimes there is also a lack of transparency in the actions of the private partner and the inspections by the public partner are insufficient.","PeriodicalId":56242,"journal":{"name":"Redes","volume":"204 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Redes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18316/redes.v11i2.9299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research was developed to understand the role played by partnerships between public and private sectors in Brazil, especially with regard to increasing efficiency in the provision of public services. Through the use of historical and dialectical methods, anchored in bibliographic and documentary research, alongside indirect data analysis, we discuss the arguments in favor of and against the use of such partnerships within the Brazilian destatization program, as an instrument to promote the rights of the collectivity. After drawing a historical line of the construction of the third way, in which partnerships arise, and debating the fundamentals of state subsidiarity, it appears that there is a mystification of state inefficiency and market superiority. Furthermore, although the number of initiatives and signed contracts has increased over the years and has been encouraged by the government, partnerships are still ineffective in practice. Partnerships, so-called innovative arrangements, are focused on old (neo) liberal practices, moving society away from public decision-making processes and weakening rights on behalf of profit, consisting in a form of transfer of capital from the State to small private groups. Sometimes there is also a lack of transparency in the actions of the private partner and the inspections by the public partner are insufficient.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西公共和私营部门之间的伙伴关系:迈向效率?
开展这项研究是为了了解巴西公共和私营部门之间的伙伴关系所发挥的作用,特别是在提高提供公共服务的效率方面。通过使用以书目和文献研究为基础的历史和辩证方法,以及间接数据分析,我们讨论了支持和反对在巴西去核化计划中使用这种伙伴关系的论点,作为促进集体权利的工具。在对第三条道路的构建(合伙关系由此产生)进行历史梳理,并对国家辅助性的基本原理进行辩论之后,似乎存在着一种对国家效率低下和市场优势的神秘化。此外,尽管多年来倡议和签署的合同数量有所增加,并得到政府的鼓励,但在实践中,伙伴关系仍然无效。伙伴关系,即所谓的创新安排,集中于旧的(新)自由主义做法,使社会远离公共决策过程,以一种将资本从国家转移到小型私人集团的形式削弱代表利润的权利。有时,私人合作伙伴的行动也缺乏透明度,公共合作伙伴的检查不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Redes
Redes Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊最新文献
O avanço do discurso da agricultura única e a urgência de ressignificação da agricultura familiar no Brasil O processo de planejamento territorial em pequenos municípios e a atuação da Associação de Municípios do Alto Vale do Itajaí em Santa Catarina Cidades pequenas, dinâmicas territoriais e mudanças na rede urbana da Região dos Vales-Rio Grande do Sul-Brasil Keep Talking do Pink Floyd e a democracia deliberativa de Jürgen Habermas Plano Diretor Participativo do Município de Petrolina e Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável (ODS): um diálogo necessário para o desenvolvimento territorial sustentável
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1