Screening for Hearing Loss in High-Risk Neonates Using Otoacoustic Emissions

IF 0.2 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Indian Journal of Otology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_55_23
Deeksha Chawla, Rohit Verma, Siddharth Bhargava, Manish Munjal, Anshuman Dhawan, Udeyana Singh
{"title":"Screening for Hearing Loss in High-Risk Neonates Using Otoacoustic Emissions","authors":"Deeksha Chawla, Rohit Verma, Siddharth Bhargava, Manish Munjal, Anshuman Dhawan, Udeyana Singh","doi":"10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_55_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: The development and maturation of the hearing process begin in the fetal stage and progresses up to 6 months of age. Neonatal screening is therefore an essential method to screen for hearing loss at an early age. As there is a paucity of literature on the use of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) and brainstem evoked response (BERA) tests for screening, hence we conducted a prospective observational study to screen the high-risk neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) using OAE and further BERA (wherever indicated). Aims: The primary objective was to estimate the incidence of hearing loss in high-risk neonates admitted to NICU using OAEs as a screening tool. A secondary objective was to determine the risk factors predictive of hearing impairment in these neonates. Settings and Design: It was a prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Subjects and Methods: The study was conducted over a period of 1 year from April 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. Fifty neonates with high-risk factors who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled and subjected to a two-staged OAE screening test and further BERA (in neonates where overall OAE result was REFER). Statistical Analysis Used: Continuous data variables were presented as means and standard deviations. Categorical data were presented as percentages and Chi-square test was used to derive comparisons. For all statistical testing, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of 50 neonates enrolled in the study, 22 (44%) passed the Stage I OAE. The remaining 28 (56%) underwent Stage II OAE, out of which 17 (34%) passed the Stage II screening. Eleven neonates with overall OAE results as REFER were taken up for BERA. Three neonates (6%) had a hearing loss on BERA while in 8 (16%) BERA was normal. The overall incidence of hearing loss was 6%. The variables with a statistically significant correlation with the results of OAE were - APGAR score and perinatal asphyxia at a low APGAR score. Conclusions: The incidence of hearing loss in this study was 6%. APGAR score and perinatal asphyxia at a low APGAR score at 1 and 5 min had statistically significant correlation with the outcomes of OAE screening.","PeriodicalId":44304,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otology","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_55_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The development and maturation of the hearing process begin in the fetal stage and progresses up to 6 months of age. Neonatal screening is therefore an essential method to screen for hearing loss at an early age. As there is a paucity of literature on the use of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) and brainstem evoked response (BERA) tests for screening, hence we conducted a prospective observational study to screen the high-risk neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) using OAE and further BERA (wherever indicated). Aims: The primary objective was to estimate the incidence of hearing loss in high-risk neonates admitted to NICU using OAEs as a screening tool. A secondary objective was to determine the risk factors predictive of hearing impairment in these neonates. Settings and Design: It was a prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary care hospital. Subjects and Methods: The study was conducted over a period of 1 year from April 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. Fifty neonates with high-risk factors who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled and subjected to a two-staged OAE screening test and further BERA (in neonates where overall OAE result was REFER). Statistical Analysis Used: Continuous data variables were presented as means and standard deviations. Categorical data were presented as percentages and Chi-square test was used to derive comparisons. For all statistical testing, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of 50 neonates enrolled in the study, 22 (44%) passed the Stage I OAE. The remaining 28 (56%) underwent Stage II OAE, out of which 17 (34%) passed the Stage II screening. Eleven neonates with overall OAE results as REFER were taken up for BERA. Three neonates (6%) had a hearing loss on BERA while in 8 (16%) BERA was normal. The overall incidence of hearing loss was 6%. The variables with a statistically significant correlation with the results of OAE were - APGAR score and perinatal asphyxia at a low APGAR score. Conclusions: The incidence of hearing loss in this study was 6%. APGAR score and perinatal asphyxia at a low APGAR score at 1 and 5 min had statistically significant correlation with the outcomes of OAE screening.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用耳声发射筛查高危新生儿听力损失
背景:听力过程的发育和成熟始于胎儿阶段,并持续到6个月大。因此,新生儿筛查是筛查早期听力损失的重要方法。由于缺乏使用耳声发射(OAE)和脑干诱发反应(BERA)测试进行筛查的文献,因此我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,使用OAE和进一步的BERA(无论在何处)筛查新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的高危新生儿。目的:主要目的是利用oae作为筛查工具,估计NICU高危新生儿听力损失的发生率。第二个目的是确定预测这些新生儿听力障碍的危险因素。背景和设计:这是一项在三级医院进行的前瞻性观察性研究。研究对象和方法:研究时间为1年,从2021年4月1日至2022年3月31日。纳入50例符合纳入标准的高危因素新生儿,并进行两阶段OAE筛查试验和进一步的BERA(在总体OAE结果为参考的新生儿中)。统计分析方法:连续数据变量以均值和标准差表示。分类数据以百分比表示,采用卡方检验进行比较。对于所有的统计检验,P <0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:纳入研究的50名新生儿中,22名(44%)通过了I期OAE。其余28例(56%)接受了II期OAE,其中17例(34%)通过了II期筛查。11名总体OAE结果为参考的新生儿被选为BERA。3例(6%)新生儿因贝拉听力丧失,8例(16%)新生儿因贝拉听力正常。听力损失的总发生率为6%。与OAE结果有统计学意义相关的变量为- APGAR评分和低APGAR评分围产儿窒息。结论:本研究听力损失发生率为6%。低APGAR评分1 min和5 min围产儿窒息与OAE筛查结果有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Otology
Indian Journal of Otology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Comparative study between anterior tucking and tunneling of graft in Type-1 tympanoplasty A comparative study of endoscopic versus microscopic tympanoplasty in chronic otitis media Application of finite element model of middle ear in the study of the middle ear biomechanics in normal and diseased states Transmastoid titanium mesh assisted extra dural layered closure of tegmen defect: Case report in a 10 year old Acoustic trauma in soldiers: Pure-tone audiometry versus distortion product otoacoustic emissions as a tool for early detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1