Comparative study between anterior tucking and tunneling of graft in Type-1 tympanoplasty

IF 0.2 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Indian Journal of Otology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_199_22
Gurchand Singh, Achintya Chawla
{"title":"Comparative study between anterior tucking and tunneling of graft in Type-1 tympanoplasty","authors":"Gurchand Singh, Achintya Chawla","doi":"10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_199_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tympanoplasty is the surgical procedure performed to repair a perforated tympanic membrane, with or without reconstruction of the ossicles, with the aim of preventing reinfection and restoring hearing ability. There are various techniques to perform Type 1 tympanoplasty. Aims and Objectives: • To compare anterior tucking and tunneling of temporalis fascia graft in Type 1 tympanoplasty based on the clinical and audiological outcome. • To study the hearing outcome and graft uptake in anterior tucking technique and anterior tunneling technique in Type 1 tympanoplasty. • To compare the hearing outcome and graft uptake in anterior tucking versus anterior tunneling technique in Type 1 tympanoplasty. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology (ENT), Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Hospital, Mullana over 2 years from September 2020 to September 2022. One hundred cases of inactive, chronic otitis media (COM) were included in this study and subjected to Type 1 tympanoplasty with 50 belonging to the anterior tucking technique (Group A) and 50 to the anterior tunneling technique (Group B). Results: The graft uptake rate was 96% in Group A (anterior tucking technique) and 98% in Group B (anterior tunneling technique). The average hearing gain in Group A was 9.94 dB and in Group B was 9.36. Chances of complications like residual perforation were found to be low (4% in Group A and 2% in Group B) in both techniques. Conclusion: In our study, we concluded that both the techniques of anterior tucking and anterior tunneling of temporalis fascia graft in Type 1 tympanoplasty surgery are equally effective to achieve intactness of graft and hearing improvement in patients of inactive, mucosal COM.","PeriodicalId":44304,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Otology","volume":"29 1","pages":"46 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_199_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tympanoplasty is the surgical procedure performed to repair a perforated tympanic membrane, with or without reconstruction of the ossicles, with the aim of preventing reinfection and restoring hearing ability. There are various techniques to perform Type 1 tympanoplasty. Aims and Objectives: • To compare anterior tucking and tunneling of temporalis fascia graft in Type 1 tympanoplasty based on the clinical and audiological outcome. • To study the hearing outcome and graft uptake in anterior tucking technique and anterior tunneling technique in Type 1 tympanoplasty. • To compare the hearing outcome and graft uptake in anterior tucking versus anterior tunneling technique in Type 1 tympanoplasty. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology (ENT), Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Hospital, Mullana over 2 years from September 2020 to September 2022. One hundred cases of inactive, chronic otitis media (COM) were included in this study and subjected to Type 1 tympanoplasty with 50 belonging to the anterior tucking technique (Group A) and 50 to the anterior tunneling technique (Group B). Results: The graft uptake rate was 96% in Group A (anterior tucking technique) and 98% in Group B (anterior tunneling technique). The average hearing gain in Group A was 9.94 dB and in Group B was 9.36. Chances of complications like residual perforation were found to be low (4% in Group A and 2% in Group B) in both techniques. Conclusion: In our study, we concluded that both the techniques of anterior tucking and anterior tunneling of temporalis fascia graft in Type 1 tympanoplasty surgery are equally effective to achieve intactness of graft and hearing improvement in patients of inactive, mucosal COM.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1型鼓室成形术中移植物前囊与隧道的比较研究
背景:鼓室成形术是一种修复穿孔鼓膜的外科手术,无论是否重建听骨,目的是防止再次感染并恢复听力。进行1型鼓室成形术有多种技术。目的和目的:•根据临床和听力学结果,比较1型鼓室成形术中颞筋膜移植物的前折叠和隧道植入。•研究1型鼓室成形术中前部填塞技术和前部隧道技术的听力结果和移植物吸收比较1型鼓室成形术中前部填塞和前部隧道技术的听力结果和移植物吸收。材料和方法:该研究于2020年9月至2022年9月在穆拉纳Maharishi Markandeshwar医学科学研究院耳鼻喉科进行,为期2年。本研究包括100例非活动性慢性中耳炎(COM),并进行1型鼓室成形术,其中50例属于前褶技术(A组),50例属于前部隧道技术(B组)。结果:A组移植物吸收率为96%,B组移植物摄取率为98%。A组的平均听力增益为9.94dB,B组为9.36。在这两种技术中,出现残余穿孔等并发症的几率都很低(A组为4%,B组为2%)。结论:在我们的研究中,我们得出结论,在1型鼓室成形术中,颞筋膜移植物的前折叠和前隧道技术对于非活动性粘膜COM患者的移植物完整性和听力改善同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Otology
Indian Journal of Otology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Comparative study between anterior tucking and tunneling of graft in Type-1 tympanoplasty A comparative study of endoscopic versus microscopic tympanoplasty in chronic otitis media Application of finite element model of middle ear in the study of the middle ear biomechanics in normal and diseased states Transmastoid titanium mesh assisted extra dural layered closure of tegmen defect: Case report in a 10 year old Acoustic trauma in soldiers: Pure-tone audiometry versus distortion product otoacoustic emissions as a tool for early detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1