Comparison of Conventional Clinical and Laboratory Findings with 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga Citrate PET/CT in terms of Diagnostic Utility and Disease Activity Among Sarcoidosis Patients

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Imaging Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa3525
bahar kubat, Mehmet Cüneyt Tetikkurt, Haluk Burçak Sayman
{"title":"Comparison of Conventional Clinical and Laboratory Findings with 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga Citrate PET/CT in terms of Diagnostic Utility and Disease Activity Among Sarcoidosis Patients","authors":"bahar kubat, Mehmet Cüneyt Tetikkurt, Haluk Burçak Sayman","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa3525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study is to compare the traditional clinical and laboratory parameters used for the diagnosis and activity of sarcoidosis with <sup>68</sup>Ga citrate PET/CT and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT findings. Material and Method: 19 <sup>68</sup>Ga citrate PET/CT scans and 20 <sup>68</sup>Ga citrate PET/CT and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans of both patients were included in the study. Demographic features of the cases, clinical findings, chest X-ray, Thorax CT, respiratory function tests, laboratory results, bronchoscopic and extrapulmonary organ biopsies, <sup>68</sup>Ga citrate PET/CT and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scan results retrospectively. The obtained data were uploaded to computer systems. Analysis was performed using statistical methods. Conclusion: A statistically significant difference was found between <sup>68</sup>Ga Citrate PET/CT result and acceptance of active sarcoidosis (p=0.001), acceptance of clinical sarcoidosis (p=0.029), and probability of sarcoidosis (p=0.020). There was no statistically significant difference between the <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and <sup>68</sup>Ga Citrate PET/CT results of patients who were accepted as clinical sarcoidosis (p=0.1000). Extrathoracic involvement was detected in %44,4 of 18 patients with active sarcoidosis in <sup>68</sup>Ga citrate PET/CT. The cost advantage of <sup>68</sup>Ga Citrate PET/CT has been demonstrated. Results: The success of <sup>68</sup>Ga citrate PET/CT has been proven in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, activation and detection of extrathoracic involvement and determination of biopsy sites. No significant difference was found in the comparison with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT","PeriodicalId":34850,"journal":{"name":"Imaging","volume":"2016 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa3525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the traditional clinical and laboratory parameters used for the diagnosis and activity of sarcoidosis with 68Ga citrate PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT findings. Material and Method: 19 68Ga citrate PET/CT scans and 20 68Ga citrate PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT scans of both patients were included in the study. Demographic features of the cases, clinical findings, chest X-ray, Thorax CT, respiratory function tests, laboratory results, bronchoscopic and extrapulmonary organ biopsies, 68Ga citrate PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT scan results retrospectively. The obtained data were uploaded to computer systems. Analysis was performed using statistical methods. Conclusion: A statistically significant difference was found between 68Ga Citrate PET/CT result and acceptance of active sarcoidosis (p=0.001), acceptance of clinical sarcoidosis (p=0.029), and probability of sarcoidosis (p=0.020). There was no statistically significant difference between the 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga Citrate PET/CT results of patients who were accepted as clinical sarcoidosis (p=0.1000). Extrathoracic involvement was detected in %44,4 of 18 patients with active sarcoidosis in 68Ga citrate PET/CT. The cost advantage of 68Ga Citrate PET/CT has been demonstrated. Results: The success of 68Ga citrate PET/CT has been proven in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, activation and detection of extrathoracic involvement and determination of biopsy sites. No significant difference was found in the comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
18F-FDG PET/CT与68Ga柠檬酸盐PET/CT在结节病诊断效用及疾病活动性方面的临床和实验室常规表现比较
目的:本研究的目的是比较用于结节病诊断的传统临床和实验室参数与68Ga柠檬酸盐PET/CT和18F-FDG PET/CT的表现。材料与方法:本研究包括19张68Ga柠檬酸盐PET/CT, 20张68Ga柠檬酸盐PET/CT和18F-FDG PET/CT。病例人口学特征、临床表现、胸片、胸部CT、呼吸功能检查、实验室检查、支气管镜及肺外器官活检、68Ga枸橼酸PET/CT及18F-FDG PET/CT回顾性分析。获得的数据被上传到计算机系统。采用统计学方法进行分析。结论:68Ga Citrate PET/CT结果与活动性结节病接受度(p=0.001)、临床结节病接受度(p=0.029)、结节病发生概率(p=0.020)差异有统计学意义。诊断为结节病患者的18F-FDG PET/CT与68Ga Citrate PET/CT结果差异无统计学意义(p=0.1000)。68Ga柠檬酸盐PET/CT显示,18例活动性结节病中有44.4%累及胸外。证明了68Ga柠檬酸盐PET/CT的成本优势。结果:68Ga柠檬酸盐PET/CT在结节病的诊断、胸外受累的激活和检测以及活检部位的确定方面取得了成功。与18F-FDG PET/CT比较无明显差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Imaging
Imaging MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Radiographic analysis provides evidence for the etiology of pulmonary cysts in COVID-19 Dieulafoy's lesion, the endovascular approach as a therapeutic option when endoscopic treatment has failed: A case report and brief review Three-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiography in Cor Triatriatum Sinister: Make new friends but keep the old Colonic basidiobolomycosis masquerading as colon cancer with liver metastasis: A case report and review of literature Dual-energy CT in the emergency department: A pictorial essay from a single center experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1