The clinical significance of CT-Thorax in the assessment of difficult to treat Asthma

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Imaging Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa4004
AMER ALMAGHRABI, Ali Bahron, Julie Marsh, Adel Mansur
{"title":"The clinical significance of CT-Thorax in the assessment of difficult to treat Asthma","authors":"AMER ALMAGHRABI, Ali Bahron, Julie Marsh, Adel Mansur","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa4004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Background:</b> CT scan of thorax often forms part of the diagnostic algorithm of difficult to treat asthma (DTA). However its diagnostic value and effect on patient management remained largely undetermined. <b>Aim:</b> To assess the diagnostic value of CT-Thorax in the management of DTA. <b>Methods:</b> Unselected patients with DTA presenting to a tertiary severe asthma centre were put through a systematic assessment protocol and undertook high resolution CT-thorax. Radiological diagnoses in addition to demographics and asthma related clinical outcomes were explored using standard statistics. <b>Results:</b> A cohort of 290 patients were included in the study (mean age 51±14.2 years, 62.1% females, Caucasians 74.8%, non-smokers 57.8%, BMI 31.7±7.6 kg, ACQ6 2.9±1.6, %predicted FEV 1 72.8±26, FeNO 51.62±44.8 ppb, blood eosinophils 452±459 cell/µl, severe exacerbations 5.9±4.3 per annum, maintenance oral corticosteroids 30%). The observed CT abnormalities were bronchial wall thickening 76.1%, bronchiectasis 49.4%, ground-glass 34.7%, mucus plugging 28.1%, air-trapping 29.2%, central bronchiectasis 7.2%, emphysema 5.5%, in addition to other less common diagnoses (e.g. eosinophilic pneumonia). We observed no significant difference between the bronchiectasis and non-bronchiectasis groups in terms of annual severe exacerbations (7.1±5.1 vs 6.0±3.9, p=0.1 respectively), lung function, blood eosinophils or FeNO. <b>Conclusions:</b> Radiological abnormalities were prevalent in DTA patients and may have impact on patient management prompting the need to consider CT-thorax as an integral part of DTA diagnostic algorithm. Further results on dynamic CT findings will be provided in the conference.","PeriodicalId":34850,"journal":{"name":"Imaging","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa4004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: CT scan of thorax often forms part of the diagnostic algorithm of difficult to treat asthma (DTA). However its diagnostic value and effect on patient management remained largely undetermined. Aim: To assess the diagnostic value of CT-Thorax in the management of DTA. Methods: Unselected patients with DTA presenting to a tertiary severe asthma centre were put through a systematic assessment protocol and undertook high resolution CT-thorax. Radiological diagnoses in addition to demographics and asthma related clinical outcomes were explored using standard statistics. Results: A cohort of 290 patients were included in the study (mean age 51±14.2 years, 62.1% females, Caucasians 74.8%, non-smokers 57.8%, BMI 31.7±7.6 kg, ACQ6 2.9±1.6, %predicted FEV 1 72.8±26, FeNO 51.62±44.8 ppb, blood eosinophils 452±459 cell/µl, severe exacerbations 5.9±4.3 per annum, maintenance oral corticosteroids 30%). The observed CT abnormalities were bronchial wall thickening 76.1%, bronchiectasis 49.4%, ground-glass 34.7%, mucus plugging 28.1%, air-trapping 29.2%, central bronchiectasis 7.2%, emphysema 5.5%, in addition to other less common diagnoses (e.g. eosinophilic pneumonia). We observed no significant difference between the bronchiectasis and non-bronchiectasis groups in terms of annual severe exacerbations (7.1±5.1 vs 6.0±3.9, p=0.1 respectively), lung function, blood eosinophils or FeNO. Conclusions: Radiological abnormalities were prevalent in DTA patients and may have impact on patient management prompting the need to consider CT-thorax as an integral part of DTA diagnostic algorithm. Further results on dynamic CT findings will be provided in the conference.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ct胸片在评价难治性哮喘中的临床意义
背景:胸部CT扫描常成为难治性哮喘(DTA)诊断算法的一部分。然而,它的诊断价值和对患者管理的影响在很大程度上仍不确定。目的:探讨ct胸片对DTA的诊断价值。方法:对未选择到三级重症哮喘中心就诊的DTA患者进行系统评估并进行高分辨率ct胸片检查。放射学诊断、人口统计学和哮喘相关的临床结果采用标准统计学进行探讨。结果:研究纳入290例患者(平均年龄51±14.2岁,女性62.1%,白种人74.8%,非吸烟者57.8%,BMI 31.7±7.6 kg, ACQ6 2.9±1.6,%预测FEV 1 72.8±26,FeNO 51.62±44.8 ppb,血嗜酸性粒细胞452±459细胞/µl,严重恶化每年5.9±4.3,维持口服糖皮质激素30%)。CT异常为支气管壁增厚76.1%,支气管扩张49.4%,磨玻璃34.7%,粘液堵塞28.1%,空气潴留29.2%,中枢性支气管扩张7.2%,肺气肿5.5%,此外还有一些少见的诊断(如嗜酸性粒细胞性肺炎)。我们观察到支气管扩张组和非支气管扩张组在年严重加重次数(7.1±5.1 vs 6.0±3.9,p=0.1)、肺功能、血嗜酸性粒细胞或FeNO方面无显著差异。结论:影像学异常在DTA患者中普遍存在,可能对患者的治疗产生影响,因此需要考虑将ct -胸作为DTA诊断算法的一个组成部分。进一步的动态CT结果将在会议上提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Imaging
Imaging MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Radiographic analysis provides evidence for the etiology of pulmonary cysts in COVID-19 Dieulafoy's lesion, the endovascular approach as a therapeutic option when endoscopic treatment has failed: A case report and brief review Three-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiography in Cor Triatriatum Sinister: Make new friends but keep the old Colonic basidiobolomycosis masquerading as colon cancer with liver metastasis: A case report and review of literature Dual-energy CT in the emergency department: A pictorial essay from a single center experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1