A missed opportunity - fibrosis on previous abdominal CTs in patients referred to an ILD clinic

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Imaging Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa4011
Jude Wellens-Mensah, Matthew Embley, Paul Cadden, Mudher Al-Khairalla, Peter Williamson, Mark Spears
{"title":"A missed opportunity - fibrosis on previous abdominal CTs in patients referred to an ILD clinic","authors":"Jude Wellens-Mensah, Matthew Embley, Paul Cadden, Mudher Al-Khairalla, Peter Williamson, Mark Spears","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa4011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction:</b> Early use of anti-fibrotic medication in pulmonary fibrosis protects lung function, prolonging quality of life. Increased use of CT could enable detection of disease before significant symptoms develop. The majority of CT scans are requested by primary care teams, general physicians or surgeons. However these groups&nbsp;are&nbsp;unfamiliar with the significance of classical descriptors for pulmonary fibrosis used by radiologists. A recent case (patient presented with disabling breathlessness requiring oxygen at diagnosis, a year after CT for cholecystitis)&nbsp;led us to audit our ILD clinic with the aim of determining local prevalence. <b>Methods:</b> 116 patient records at a University Clinic were reviewed, to ascertain the prevalence of CT abdomen scans prior to referral. In addition to reports with ’refer to respiratory’ we sought words&nbsp;commonly employed to describe fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (reticulation, honeycombing, ground glass). Findings 11 patients had abdominal CT scans before referral. 5 had fibrosis present. Time from these scans to clinic review ranged from 3 to 36 months. Only 2 reports recommended referral to the respiratory team. A further 2 contained descriptors but no guidance, and one report failed to describe the fibrosis. Reports recommending ’refer to respiratory’ were followed. Of the remaining three patients, all were referred by their GP following presentation with symptoms. <b>Conclusions:</b> Abdominal CTs could enable early referral to ILD clinics, but this opportunity is lost due to&nbsp;reporting habits. Clear guidance to requestors is followed and should be employed as standard. Radiology training and education should target this issue, to improve outcomes for patients.","PeriodicalId":34850,"journal":{"name":"Imaging","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa4011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Early use of anti-fibrotic medication in pulmonary fibrosis protects lung function, prolonging quality of life. Increased use of CT could enable detection of disease before significant symptoms develop. The majority of CT scans are requested by primary care teams, general physicians or surgeons. However these groups are unfamiliar with the significance of classical descriptors for pulmonary fibrosis used by radiologists. A recent case (patient presented with disabling breathlessness requiring oxygen at diagnosis, a year after CT for cholecystitis) led us to audit our ILD clinic with the aim of determining local prevalence. Methods: 116 patient records at a University Clinic were reviewed, to ascertain the prevalence of CT abdomen scans prior to referral. In addition to reports with ’refer to respiratory’ we sought words commonly employed to describe fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (reticulation, honeycombing, ground glass). Findings 11 patients had abdominal CT scans before referral. 5 had fibrosis present. Time from these scans to clinic review ranged from 3 to 36 months. Only 2 reports recommended referral to the respiratory team. A further 2 contained descriptors but no guidance, and one report failed to describe the fibrosis. Reports recommending ’refer to respiratory’ were followed. Of the remaining three patients, all were referred by their GP following presentation with symptoms. Conclusions: Abdominal CTs could enable early referral to ILD clinics, but this opportunity is lost due to reporting habits. Clear guidance to requestors is followed and should be employed as standard. Radiology training and education should target this issue, to improve outcomes for patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个错过的机会-以前的腹部ct纤维化患者转介到ILD诊所
简介:肺纤维化患者早期使用抗纤维化药物可保护肺功能,延长生活质量。增加CT的使用可以在显著症状出现之前发现疾病。大多数CT扫描是由初级保健团队、普通内科医生或外科医生要求的。然而,这些群体不熟悉放射科医生使用的肺纤维化经典描述符的意义。最近的一个病例(患者在诊断时出现致残性呼吸困难,需要吸氧,在胆囊炎CT检查一年后)使我们对ILD诊所进行审计,目的是确定当地的患病率。方法:回顾了116名大学门诊患者的记录,以确定转诊前腹部CT扫描的患病率。除了“涉及呼吸系统”的报告外,我们还寻找了通常用于描述纤维化间质性肺疾病的词汇(网状、蜂窝状、磨玻璃)。结果11例患者转诊前均行腹部CT扫描。5例有纤维化。从这些扫描到临床复查的时间为3至36个月。只有2份报告建议转诊到呼吸科。另有2份报告包含描述但没有指导,1份报告未能描述纤维化。报告建议“参考呼吸道”。其余三名患者均在出现症状后由全科医生转诊。结论:腹部ct检查可以使早期转诊到ILD诊所,但由于报告习惯,这个机会失去了。遵循对请求者的明确指导,并应作为标准使用。放射学培训和教育应针对这一问题,以改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Imaging
Imaging MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Radiographic analysis provides evidence for the etiology of pulmonary cysts in COVID-19 Dieulafoy's lesion, the endovascular approach as a therapeutic option when endoscopic treatment has failed: A case report and brief review Three-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiography in Cor Triatriatum Sinister: Make new friends but keep the old Colonic basidiobolomycosis masquerading as colon cancer with liver metastasis: A case report and review of literature Dual-energy CT in the emergency department: A pictorial essay from a single center experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1