Discourse Analysis of the 2022 Australian Tennis Open: A Multimodal Appraisal Perspective

Q2 Arts and Humanities Hermes (Denmark) Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI:10.7146/hjlcb.vi63.140134
Nickolas Komninos
{"title":"Discourse Analysis of the 2022 Australian Tennis Open: A Multimodal Appraisal Perspective","authors":"Nickolas Komninos","doi":"10.7146/hjlcb.vi63.140134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a preliminary analysis of a corpus of texts relating to the 2022 Australian Tennis Open using a multimodal appraisal framework. The study utilises quantitative and qualitative content analysis to examine media reports, official statements, and public reactions to the incident, which centred around Novak Djokovic's vaccination status. The analysis focusses on assessing how evaluative language contributes to community-building and identifies the underlying values, beliefs, and evaluations that shape stakeholders' emotional, cognitive, and behavioural responses.The appraisal framework, encompassing attitude, engagement, and graduation, serves as a comprehensive tool for categorising resources that express evaluation. Furthermore, the article delves into the application of appraisal analysis within the context of multimodal and online discourse, encompassing various platforms such as newspapers, television, radio, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, blogs, official political statements, and court rulings. By examining these diverse media, the study seeks to investigate the dynamic discourse interplay surrounding the 2022 Australian Open, highlighting the pivotal role of evaluative communication in fostering alignment among readers through shared values and attitudes.The preliminary findings suggest that access to greater semiotic recourses increases consensus. The gains from using this interpretative framework are an asset, facilitating the coding of a large data set and attending the different manifestations of discourses around the player’s participation. As discourse continues to shape societal narratives, this multimodal appraisal investigation contributes to our understanding of the complex dynamics inherent in discourse construction and the influence of evaluative language in shaping collective perception.","PeriodicalId":38609,"journal":{"name":"Hermes (Denmark)","volume":"153 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hermes (Denmark)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.vi63.140134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a preliminary analysis of a corpus of texts relating to the 2022 Australian Tennis Open using a multimodal appraisal framework. The study utilises quantitative and qualitative content analysis to examine media reports, official statements, and public reactions to the incident, which centred around Novak Djokovic's vaccination status. The analysis focusses on assessing how evaluative language contributes to community-building and identifies the underlying values, beliefs, and evaluations that shape stakeholders' emotional, cognitive, and behavioural responses.The appraisal framework, encompassing attitude, engagement, and graduation, serves as a comprehensive tool for categorising resources that express evaluation. Furthermore, the article delves into the application of appraisal analysis within the context of multimodal and online discourse, encompassing various platforms such as newspapers, television, radio, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, blogs, official political statements, and court rulings. By examining these diverse media, the study seeks to investigate the dynamic discourse interplay surrounding the 2022 Australian Open, highlighting the pivotal role of evaluative communication in fostering alignment among readers through shared values and attitudes.The preliminary findings suggest that access to greater semiotic recourses increases consensus. The gains from using this interpretative framework are an asset, facilitating the coding of a large data set and attending the different manifestations of discourses around the player’s participation. As discourse continues to shape societal narratives, this multimodal appraisal investigation contributes to our understanding of the complex dynamics inherent in discourse construction and the influence of evaluative language in shaping collective perception.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2022年澳大利亚网球公开赛话语分析:多模态评价视角
本文使用多模态评估框架对2022年澳大利亚网球公开赛相关文本语料库进行了初步分析。该研究利用定量和定性的内容分析来检查媒体报道、官方声明和公众对事件的反应,这些事件以诺瓦克·德约科维奇的疫苗接种状况为中心。分析的重点是评估评估性语言如何有助于社区建设,并确定影响利益相关者情感、认知和行为反应的潜在价值观、信念和评估。评估框架包括态度、参与和毕业,是对表达评估的资源进行分类的综合工具。此外,本文还深入研究了评价分析在多模式和在线话语背景下的应用,包括各种平台,如报纸、电视、广播、YouTube、Twitter、Instagram、博客、官方政治声明和法院裁决。通过研究这些不同的媒体,该研究试图调查围绕2022年澳大利亚网球公开赛的动态话语相互作用,强调评估性沟通在通过共同的价值观和态度促进读者之间的一致性方面的关键作用。初步研究结果表明,获得更多的符号学资源可以增加共识。使用这种解释框架所获得的收益是一种资产,可以促进大型数据集的编码,并参与围绕玩家参与的话语的不同表现。随着话语不断塑造社会叙事,这种多模态评价研究有助于我们理解话语构建中固有的复杂动态,以及评价语言在塑造集体感知方面的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hermes (Denmark)
Hermes (Denmark) Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Master Narratives in US Contemporary War Discourse: Situating and Constructing Identities of Self and Other Discourse Analysis of the 2022 Australian Tennis Open: A Multimodal Appraisal Perspective Strategies of Justification in Resolving Conflicts of Values and Interests. A Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Argumentation in Cases of Animal Sacrifice consentimiento informado en la comunicación médico-paciente: análisis crítico del marco legislativo Introduction: Evaluation, Argumentation and Narrative(s) in Conflicting Contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1