Contemporary analyses of comparative fishing data: a case study of Thorny skate on the Grand Banks (NAFO Divisions 3LNOP)

Q3 Environmental Science Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.2960/j.v54.m739
Noel Cadigan, Mark Simpson
{"title":"Contemporary analyses of comparative fishing data: a case study of Thorny skate on the Grand Banks (NAFO Divisions 3LNOP)","authors":"Noel Cadigan, Mark Simpson","doi":"10.2960/j.v54.m739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We re-analyze Thorny skate data from two comparative fishing experiments conducted by DFO in 1995 and 1996 using improved and more contemporary methods to estimate the relative efficiency of the Campelen 1800 demersal shrimp trawl survey protocol compared to the Engel 145 otter trawl. We correct possible bias in the method previously applied to these data. We investigate if there are size-based differences and if depth or spatial regions have important effects on results. We also investigate the influence and robustness of the estimation procedures, which was a concern in the original analyses of these data for other groundfish species. We did not find strong evidence that the relative efficiency of the Campelen trawl protocol compared to the Engel was different for smaller-sized Thorny skate compared to larger ones. However, we conclude that there is a potential that size-based differential catchability existed but there is insufficient information to reliably estimate these effects for Thorny skate. We also found evidence of significant differences in relative efficiency among NAFO Divisions and experiments, which is similar to other flatfish species. However, the mechanisms for these differences are unknown and it is not clear if spatial estimates should be used when converting Engel indices to Campelen equivalents. Hence, we do not recommend a different Engel-Campelen conversion factor than the one currently used in stock assessments for Thorny skates on the Grand Banks (NAFO Divisions 3LNOPs).","PeriodicalId":16669,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2960/j.v54.m739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We re-analyze Thorny skate data from two comparative fishing experiments conducted by DFO in 1995 and 1996 using improved and more contemporary methods to estimate the relative efficiency of the Campelen 1800 demersal shrimp trawl survey protocol compared to the Engel 145 otter trawl. We correct possible bias in the method previously applied to these data. We investigate if there are size-based differences and if depth or spatial regions have important effects on results. We also investigate the influence and robustness of the estimation procedures, which was a concern in the original analyses of these data for other groundfish species. We did not find strong evidence that the relative efficiency of the Campelen trawl protocol compared to the Engel was different for smaller-sized Thorny skate compared to larger ones. However, we conclude that there is a potential that size-based differential catchability existed but there is insufficient information to reliably estimate these effects for Thorny skate. We also found evidence of significant differences in relative efficiency among NAFO Divisions and experiments, which is similar to other flatfish species. However, the mechanisms for these differences are unknown and it is not clear if spatial estimates should be used when converting Engel indices to Campelen equivalents. Hence, we do not recommend a different Engel-Campelen conversion factor than the one currently used in stock assessments for Thorny skates on the Grand Banks (NAFO Divisions 3LNOPs).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代比较捕捞数据分析:以大浅滩带刺鳐为例(NAFO分区3LNOP)
我们重新分析了DFO在1995年和1996年进行的两次比较捕鱼实验中的刺鳐数据,使用改进的和更现代的方法来估计Campelen 1800底栖虾拖网调查方案与Engel 145水獭拖网调查方案的相对效率。我们纠正了先前应用于这些数据的方法中可能存在的偏差。我们调查了是否存在基于尺寸的差异,以及深度或空间区域是否对结果有重要影响。我们还研究了估计程序的影响和稳健性,这是对其他底栖鱼类的这些数据的原始分析中关注的问题。我们没有发现强有力的证据表明,与恩格尔相比,坎佩伦拖网协议的相对效率对于较小的刺鳐和较大的刺鳐是不同的。然而,我们得出结论,存在基于尺寸的差异捕获能力的可能性,但没有足够的信息来可靠地估计这些影响对刺鳐的影响。我们还发现了NAFO部门和实验之间相对效率显著差异的证据,这与其他比目鱼种类相似。然而,造成这些差异的机制尚不清楚,也不清楚在将Engel指数转换为Campelen当量时是否应该使用空间估计。因此,我们不建议使用不同于目前在大浅滩(NAFO division 3LNOPs)多刺冰鞋种群评估中使用的恩格尔-坎佩伦转换系数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science
Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: The journal focuses on environmental, biological, economic and social science aspects of living marine resources and ecosystems of the northwest Atlantic Ocean. It also welcomes inter-disciplinary fishery-related papers and contributions of general applicability.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of bycatch patterns in four northeastern USA trawl fisheries What the Hakes? Correlating Environmental Factors with Hake Abundance in the Gulf of Maine Contemporary analyses of comparative fishing data: a case study of Thorny skate on the Grand Banks (NAFO Divisions 3LNOP) Evaluating growth dimorphism, maturation, and skip spawning of Atlantic halibut in the Gulf of Maine using a collaborative research approach Limited temporal variability in natural mortality for juvenile American plaice on the Grand Bank of Newfoundland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1