Motor and Sensory Balance Deficits in Individuals Immediately After COVID-19, a Cohort Study

Diane M. Wrisley, Eder A. Garavito, Brittany Jones, Tamara Klintworth-Kirk, Ashley K. Poole
{"title":"Motor and Sensory Balance Deficits in Individuals Immediately After COVID-19, a Cohort Study","authors":"Diane M. Wrisley, Eder A. Garavito, Brittany Jones, Tamara Klintworth-Kirk, Ashley K. Poole","doi":"10.1097/cpt.0000000000000238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose: Individuals with cardiorespiratory dysfunction demonstrate postural instability and increased risk of falls. Given that coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is commonly defined as a respiratory condition, it could be presumed that these patients may demonstrate similar balance deficits. This study aimed to determine deficits and characterize balance dysfunction (sensory or motor) in hospitalized patients classified as “COVID-19 recovered.” Methods: Twenty-five participants consented for this study. Participants completed the Activity-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), a questionnaire about dizziness, the Timed “Up & Go” (TUG), and the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance in a single session. The percentage of subjects who scored abnormal on the outcome measures was calculated. Correlations between demographics, respiratory function, and clinical outcome measures were determined using Spearman correlation coefficient. Results: All participants had abnormal scores on the TUG, 88% had abnormal scores on the ABC, and 48% of the subjects had abnormal scores on standing on foam eyes closed indicating difficulty using vestibular information. No correlation coefficient above 0.50 was found between the demographic information, respiratory function, and clinical outcome measures. Discussion: Clinical outcome measure scores did not correlate with respiratory function indicating that the deficits may be due to the extrapulmonary components of COVID-19. Conclusion: Both young and older adults presented with motor and sensory balance deficits acutely after COVID-19 infection. It is recommended that individuals acutely post–COVID-19 receive education and interventions to increase mobility, improve balance, decrease fall risk, and specifically receive activities that stimulate the vestibular system.","PeriodicalId":72526,"journal":{"name":"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiopulmonary physical therapy journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/cpt.0000000000000238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Individuals with cardiorespiratory dysfunction demonstrate postural instability and increased risk of falls. Given that coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is commonly defined as a respiratory condition, it could be presumed that these patients may demonstrate similar balance deficits. This study aimed to determine deficits and characterize balance dysfunction (sensory or motor) in hospitalized patients classified as “COVID-19 recovered.” Methods: Twenty-five participants consented for this study. Participants completed the Activity-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), a questionnaire about dizziness, the Timed “Up & Go” (TUG), and the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction and Balance in a single session. The percentage of subjects who scored abnormal on the outcome measures was calculated. Correlations between demographics, respiratory function, and clinical outcome measures were determined using Spearman correlation coefficient. Results: All participants had abnormal scores on the TUG, 88% had abnormal scores on the ABC, and 48% of the subjects had abnormal scores on standing on foam eyes closed indicating difficulty using vestibular information. No correlation coefficient above 0.50 was found between the demographic information, respiratory function, and clinical outcome measures. Discussion: Clinical outcome measure scores did not correlate with respiratory function indicating that the deficits may be due to the extrapulmonary components of COVID-19. Conclusion: Both young and older adults presented with motor and sensory balance deficits acutely after COVID-19 infection. It is recommended that individuals acutely post–COVID-19 receive education and interventions to increase mobility, improve balance, decrease fall risk, and specifically receive activities that stimulate the vestibular system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项队列研究:COVID-19后个体的运动和感觉平衡缺陷
背景和目的:患有心肺功能障碍的个体表现出姿势不稳定和跌倒的风险增加。鉴于冠状病毒病(COVID-19)通常被定义为一种呼吸系统疾病,可以假设这些患者可能表现出类似的平衡缺陷。这项研究旨在确定被归类为“COVID-19康复”的住院患者的缺陷和平衡功能障碍(感觉或运动)特征。方法:25名同意参加本研究的参与者。参与者完成了特定活动平衡信心量表(ABC),一份关于头晕的问卷,定时“起床”;Go”(TUG),以及在单次会话中改进的感觉相互作用和平衡临床测试。计算结果测量中得分异常的受试者百分比。使用Spearman相关系数确定人口统计学、呼吸功能和临床结果测量之间的相关性。结果:所有被试在TUG上得分异常,88%的被试在ABC上得分异常,48%的被试闭泡沫眼站立得分异常,表明前庭信息使用困难。人口学信息、呼吸功能与临床结局指标之间的相关系数均不高于0.50。讨论:临床结果测量评分与呼吸功能无关,表明缺陷可能是由COVID-19的肺外成分引起的。结论:青年人和老年人在COVID-19感染后均出现急性运动和感觉平衡障碍。建议急性covid -19后患者接受教育和干预,以增加活动能力,改善平衡,降低跌倒风险,特别是接受刺激前庭系统的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Associations between Physical Activity, Systemic Inflammation, and Hospital Admissions in Adults with Heart Failure. From the Swimming Pool to Precision Cardiovascular Physical Therapy: What a Journey! Commentary on “Diagnosis of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Outpatients With Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Survey of Orthopedic and Sports Academies” Professional Community Simulation-Based Cardiopulmonary Examination Skills Checklist: Assessment of Inter-rater Reliability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1